Physicochemical evolution and molecular adaptation of the cetacean and artiodactyl cytochrome b proteins

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 437-455

  McClellan, D A ^a   Palfreyman, E J ^a,c   Smith, M J ^a,d   Moss, J L ^a   Christensen, R G ^a,e   Sailsbery, J K ^a,b  

^a BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b 3361 TMCB   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d HARVARD LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

^e WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Artiodactyla; Cetacea; Cytochrome b; Molecular adaptation; Physicochemical amino acid properties; Protein evolution

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; AMINO ACID; CYTOCHROME B; DNA;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; ARTIODACTYLA; CODON; DNA SEQUENCE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PROTEIN DOMAIN;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; ARTIODACTYLA; CETACEA; CYTOCHROMES B; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; MODELS, GENETIC;

EID: 14544300682     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msi028     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alff-Steinberger, C. 1969. The genetic code and error transmission. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 64:584-591.
2. Andrews, T. D., L. S. Jermiin, and S. Easteal. 1998. Accelerated evolution of cytochrome b in simian primates: adaptive evolution in concert with other mitochondrial proteins? J. Mol. Evol. 47:249-257.
3. Arnason, U., and A. Gullberg. 1996. Cytochrome b nucleotide sequences and the identification of five primary lineages of extant cetaceans. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:407-417.
4. Golding, G. B., and A. M. Dean. 1998. The structural basis of molecular adaptation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:355-369.
5. Degli Esposti, M., S. De Vries, M. Crimi, A. Ghelli, T. Paternello, and A. Meyer. 1993. Mitochondrial cytochrome b: evolution and structure of the protein. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1143:243-271.
6. DeWalt, T. S., P. D. Sudman, M. S. Hafner, and S. K. Davis. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships of pocket gophers (Cratogeomys and Pappogeomys) based on mitochondrial DNA cytochrome b sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2:193-204.
7. Fares, M. A., S. F. Elena, J. Ortiz, A. Moya, and E. Barrio. 2002. A sliding-window method to detect selective constraints in protein-coding genes and its application to RNA viruses. J. Mol. Evol. 55:509-521.
8. Gaucher, E. A., M. M. Miyamoto, and S. A. Benner. 2003. Evolutionary, structural and biochemical evidence for a new interaction site of the leptin obesity protein. Genetics 163:1549-1553.
9. Grantham, R. 1974. Amino acid difference formula to help explain protein evolution. Science 185:862-864.
10. Griffiths, C. S. 1997. Correlation of functional domains and rates of nucleotide substitution in cytochrome b. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 7:352-365.
11. Gromiha, M. M., and P. K. Ponnuswamy. 1993. Relationship between amino acid properties and protein compressibility. J. Theoret. Biol. 165:87-100.
12. Grossman, L. I., T. R. Schmidt, D. E. Wildman, and M. Goodman. 2001. Molecular evolution of aerobic energy metabolism in primates. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 18:26-36.
13. Irwin, D. M., T. D. Kocher, and A. C. Wilson. 1991. Evolution of the cytochrome b gene of mammals. J. Mol. Evol. 32: 128-144.
14. 1 complex. Science 281:64-71.
15. Koshi, J. M., D. P. Mindell, and R. A. Goldstein. 1999. Using physical-chemistry-based substitution models in phylogenetic analyses of HIV-1 subtypes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:173-179.
16. Kyte, J., and R. F. Doolittle. 1982. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J. Mol. Biol. 157:105-132.
17. Lynn, D. J., A. T. Lloyd, M. A. Fares, and C. O'Farrelly. 2004. Evidence of positively selected sites in mammalian α-defensins. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:819-827.
18. McClellan, D. A. 2000. The codon-degeneracy model of molecular evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 50:131-140.
19. McClellan, D. A., and K. G. McCracken. 2001. Estimating the influence of selection on the variable amino acid sites of the cytochrome b protein functional domains. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:917-925.
20. McClellan, D. A., J. K. Sailsbery, and R. G. Christensen. 2003. CDM: codon-degeneracy model. Version 2.0. Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.
21. McClellan, D. A., D. G. Whiting, R. G. Christensen, and J. K. Sailsbery. 2004. Genetic codes as evolutionary filters: subtle differences in the structure of genetic codes result in significant differences in patterns of nucleotide substitution. J. Theoret. Biol. 226:393-400.
22. Milinkovitch, M. C., A. Meyer, and J. R. Powell. 1994. Phylogeny of all major groups of cetaceans based on DNA sequences from three mitochondrial genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:939-948.
23. Naylor, G. J. P., and M. Gerstein. 2000. Measuring shifts in function and evolutionary opportunity using variability profiles: a case study of the globins. J. Mol. Evol. 51:223-233.
24. Nielsen, R., and J. P. Huelsenbeck. 2002. Detecting positively selected amino acid sites using posterior predictive P-values. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 2002:576-588.
25. Nikaido, M., F. Matsuno, H. Hamilton, R. L. Brownell Jr., Y. Cao, W. Ding, Z. Zuoyan, A. M. Shedlock, R. E. Fordyce, M. Hasagawa, and N. Okada. 2001. Retroposon analysis of major cetacean lineages: the monophyly of toothed whales and the paraphyly of river dolphins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:7384-7389.
26. Nikaido, M., A. P. Rooney, and N. Okada. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships among cetartiodactyls based on insertions of short and long interspersed elements: hippopotamuses are the closest extant relatives of whales. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:10261-10266.
27. Posada, D., and K. A. Crandall. 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
28. Prabhakaran, M., and P. K. Ponnuswamy. 1979. The spatial distribution of physical, chemical, energetic and conformational properties of amino acid residues in globular proteins. J. theoret. Biol. 80:485-504.
29. Ronquist, F., and J. P. Huelsenbeck. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572-1574.
30. Schmidt, T. R., W. Wu, M. Goodman, and L. I. Grossman. 2001. Evolution of nuclear- and mitochondrial-encoded subunit interaction in cytochrome c oxidase. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18: 563-569.
31. Siltberg, J., and D. A. Liberles. 2002. A simple covarion-based approach to analyze nucleotide substitution rates. J. Evol. Biol. 15:588-594.
32. Suzuki, Y., and T. Gojobori. 1999. A method for detecting positive selection at single amino acid sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1315-1328.
33. Swofford, D. 2001. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
34. Woese, C. R., D. H. Dugre, S. A. Dugre, M. Kondo, and W. C. Saxinger. 1966. On the fundamental nature and evolution of the genetic code. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 403:304-308.
35. Woolley, S., J. Johnson, M. J. Smith, K. A. Crandall, and D. A. McClellan. 2003. TreeSAAP: selection on amino acid properties using phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 19: 671-672.
36. Xia, X., and W.-H. Li. 1998. What amino acid properties affect protein evolution? J. Mol. Evol. 47:557-564.
37. Yang, Z. 1997. PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. CABIOS 13:555-556.
38. Yang, Z., and J. P. Bielawski. 2000. Statistical methods for detecting molecular adaptation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 496-503.
39. Yang, Z., and R. Nielsen. 2002. Codon-substitution models for detecting molecular adaptation at individual sites along specific lineages. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:908-917.
40. Yang, Z., and W. J. Swanson. 2002. Codon-substitution models to detect adaptive evolution that account for heterogeneous selective pressures among site classes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:49-57.
41. Yang, Z., R. Nielsen, N. Goldman, and A.-M. K. Pedersen. 2000. Codon-substitution models for heterogeneous selection pressure at amino acid sites. Genetics 155:431-449.
42. 1. Nature 392:677-684.