Correlation of Functional Domains and Rates of Nucleotide Substitution in Cytochromeb

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 352-365

  Griffiths, Carole S ^a  

^a DIVISION OF INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME B; NUCLEOTIDE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIRD; CODON; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BINDING SITES; BIRDS; CODON; CYTOCHROME B GROUP; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NUCLEOTIDES; PHYLOGENY; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 0031157173     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/mpev.1997.0404     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Adkins R. M., Honeycutt R. L. Evolution of the primate cytochromec. J. Mol. Evol. 38:1994;215-231.
2. Becker J. Revision of "Falco" Ramenta Wetmore and the Neogene evolution of the Falconidae. Auk. 104:1987;270-276.
3. Brown L., Amadon D. Eagles, Hawks & Falcons of the World. 1968;Wellfleet Press, Secaucus.
4. Brown W. M., George M. Jr., Wilson A. C. Rapid evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 76:1979;1967-1971.
5. Brown W. M., Prager E. M., Wang A., Wilson A. C. Mitochondrial DNA sequences of primates: Tempo and mode of evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 18:1982;239-255.
6. Brown W. M. Evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA. Evolution of Genes and Proteins. 1983;Sinauer, Sunderland. p. 62-88.
7. Carpenter J. Choosing among multiple equally parsimonious cladograms. Cladistics. 4:1988;291-296.
8. Collins T. M., Wimberger P. H., Naylor G. J. P. Compositional bias, character-state bias, and character-state reconstruction using parsimony. Syst. Biol. 43:1995;482-496.
9. Degli Esposti M., De Vries S., Crimi M., Ghelli A., Patarnello T., Meyer A. Mitochondrial cytochromeb: Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1143:1993;243-271.
10. Desjardins P., Morais R. Sequence and gene organization of the chicken mitochondrial genome. J. Mol. Biol. 212:1990;599-634.
11. Dixon M. T., Hillis D. Ribosomal RNA secondary structure: Compensatory mutations and implications for phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1993;256-267.
12. Farris J. S. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics. 5:1989;417-419.
13. Farris J. S., Kallersjo M., Kluge A. G., Bult C. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Syst. Biol. 44:1995;570-571.
14. Fitch W. M. Rate of change of concomitantly variable codons. J. Mol. Evol. 1:1971;84-96.
15. Graybeal A. The phylogenetic utility of cytochromeb: Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2:1993;256-269.
16. Griffiths C. S. Monophyly of the Falconiformes based on syringeal morphology. Auk. 111:1994a;787-805.
17. Griffiths C. S. Syringeal morphology and the phylogeny of the Falconidae. Condor. 96:1994b;127-140.
18. Gu X., Fu Y., Li W. Maximum likelihood estimation of the heterogeneity of substitution rates among nucleotide sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:1995;546-557.
19. Gyllensten V., Erlich H. Generation of single-stranded DNA by the polymerase chain reaction and its applications to direct sequencing of the HLA DQa locus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 85:1988;7652-7656.
20. Hackett S. Molecular phylogenetics and biogeography of tanagers in the GenusRamphocelus. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 5:1996;368-382.
21. Helm-Bychowski K., Cracraft J. Recovering phylogenetic signal from DNA sequences: Relationships within the corvine assemblage (Class: Aves) as inferred from complete sequences of the mitochondrial DNA cytochromeb. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1993;1196-1214.
22. Hillis D. M. Approaches for assessing phylogenetic accuracy. Syst. Biol. 44:1995;3-16.
23. Hillis D. M., Larson A., Davis S. K., Zimmer E. A. Nucleic acids III: Sequencing. Hillis D. M., Moritz C. Molecular Systematics. 1990;318-370 Sinauer, Sunderland.
24. Hillis D. M., Allard M. W., Miyamoto M. M. Analysis of DNA sequence data: Phylogenetic inference. Methods Enzymol. 224:1993;456-487.
25. Holmquist R., Goodman M., Conroy T., Czelusniak J. The spatial distribution of fixed mutations within genes coding for proteins. J. Mol. Evol. 19:1983;437-448.
26. Howell N. Evolutionary conservation of protein regions in the protonmotive cytochromeb. J. Mol. Evol. 29:1989;157-169.
27. Honeycutt R. L., Nedbal M. A., Adkins R. M., Janecek L. L. Mammalian mitochondrial DNA evolution: a comparison of the cytochromebc. J. Mol. Evol. 40:1995;260-272.
28. Huelsenbeck J. P., Bull J. J. A likelihood ratio test for detection of conflicting phylogenetic signal. Syst. Biol. 45:1996;92-98.
29. Irwin D. M., Kocher T. D., Wilson A. C. Evolution of the cytochromeb. J. Mol. Evol. 32:1991;128-144.
30. Janczewski D. N., Modi W. S., Stephens J. C., O'Brien S. J. Molecular evolution of mitochondrial 12S RNA and cytochromeb. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:1995;690-707.
31. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16:1980;111-120.
32. Kornegay J. R., Kocher T. D., Williams L. A., Wilson A. C. Pathways of lysozyme evolution inferred from the sequences of cytochromeb. J. Mol. Evol. 37:1993;367-379.
33. Lockhart P. J., Steel M. A., Hendy M. D., Penny D. Recovering evolutionary trees under a more realistic model of sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:1994;605-612.
34. Milinkovitch M. C., Meyer A., Powell J. R. Phylogeny of all major groups of cetaceans based on DNA sequences from three mitochondrial genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:1994;939-948.
35. Miyamoto M. M., Allard M. W., Adkins R. M., Janecek L. L., Honeycutt R. L. A congruence test of reliability using linked mitochondrial DNA sequences. Syst. Biol. 43:1994;236-249.
36. Miyamoto M. M., Boyle S. M. The potential importance of mitochondrial DNA sequence data to eutherian mammal phylogeny. Fernholm R., Bremer K., Jornvall H. The Hierarchy of Life: Molecules and Morphology in Phylogenetic Analysis. 1989;437-450 Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
37. Miyamoto M. M., Cracraft J. Phylogenetic inference, DNA sequence analysis, and the future of molecular systematics. Miyamoto M. M., Cracraft J. Phylogenetic Analysis of DNA Sequences. 1991;3-17 Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
38. Miyamoto M. M., Fitch W. M. Testing the covarion hypothesis of molecular evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:1995;503-513.
39. Moritz C., Dowling T. E., Brown W. M. Evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA: Relevance for population biology and systematics. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18:1987;269-292.
40. Naylor G., Kraus F. The relationships between s and m and the retention index. Syst. Biol. 44:1995;559-562.
41. Nelson G. Cladistic analysis and synthesis: Principles and definitions, with a historical note on Adanson's "Familes des plantes: (1763-1764)." Syst. Zool. 28:1979;1-21.
42. Palumbi S. R. Rates of molecular evolution and the fraction of nucleotide positions free to vary. J. Mol. Evol. 29:1989;180-187.
43. Reeder T. W. Phylogenetic relationships among Phrynosomatid lizards as inferred from mitochondrial ribosomal DNA sequences: substitutional bias and information content of transitions relative to transversions. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 4:1995;203-222.
44. Sanderson M. J. Objections to bootstrapping phylogenies: A critique. Syst. Biol. 44:1995;299-320.
45. Sanderson M. J., Donoghue M. J. Patterns of variation in levels of homoplasy. Evolution. 43:1989;1781-1795.
46. Smith A. B. Rooting molecular trees: problems and strategies. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 51:1994;279-292.
47. Stresemann E., Amadon D. Falconiformes. Mayr E., Cottrell G. W. Checklist of the Birds of the World. 1979;Harvard Univ. Press. Cambridge.
48. Swofford D. L. When are phylogeny estimates from molecular and morphological data incongruent. Miyamoto M. M., Cracraft J. Phylogenetic Analysis of DNA Sequences. 1991;295-333 Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
49. D. L. Swofford, 1993, Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (PAUP), Illinois Natural History Survey, Urbana.
50. Swofford D. L., Olsen G. J., Waddell P. J., Hillis D. M. Phylogenetic inference. Hillis D. M., Moritz C., Mable B. K. Molecular Systematics. 1996;407-514 Sinauer, Sunderland.
51. Uzzell T., Corbin K. W. Fitting discrete probability distributions to evolutionary events. Science. 172:1971;1089-1096.
52. Walsh P. S., Metzger D. A., Higuchi R. Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. BioTechniques. 10:1991;506-513.