Towards a rational design of antibody catalysts through computational chemistry

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition

Volumn 44, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 904-909

  Martí, Sergio ^a   Andrés, Juan ^a   Moliner, Vicent ^a   Silla, Estanislao ^b   Tuñón, Iñaki ^b   Bertrán, Juan ^c  

^a UNIVERSITAT JAUME I   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Catalytic antibodies; Computer chemistry; Enzyme models; Oxy Cope rearrangement

Indexed keywords

CATALYSTS; STABILIZATION; SUBSTRATES;

CATALYTIC ANTIBODIES; COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY; TRANSITION STATES;

ANTIBODIES;

ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CATALYST; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER; COPE REARRANGEMENT; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; ENZYME KINETICS; ENZYME SUBSTRATE COMPLEX; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PHASE TRANSITION; QUANTUM MECHANICS;

ANTIBODIES, CATALYTIC; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 13744253946     PISSN: 14337851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/anie.200461325     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. L. Pauling, Chem. Eng. News 1946, 24, 1375-1377; L. Pauling, Am. Sci. 1948, 36, 51; L. Pauling, Nature 1948, 161, 707-709.
2. L. Pauling, Chem. Eng. News 1946, 24, 1375-1377; L. Pauling, Am. Sci. 1948, 36, 51; L. Pauling, Nature 1948, 161, 707-709.
3. L. Pauling, Chem. Eng. News 1946, 24, 1375-1377; L. Pauling, Am. Sci. 1948, 36, 51; L. Pauling, Nature 1948, 161, 707-709.
4. R. Wolfenden, Acc. Chem. Res. 1972, 5, 10-18; R. Wolfenden, M. J. Snider, Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 938-945.
5. R. Wolfenden, Acc. Chem. Res. 1972, 5, 10-18; R. Wolfenden, M. J. Snider, Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 938-945.
6. V. I. Schramm, Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 588.
7. V. Raso, B. D. Stollar, Biochemistry 1975, 14, 584-591.
8. P. G. Schultz, R. A. Lerner, Science 1995, 269, 1835-1842.
9. P. G. Schultz, R. A. Lerner, Acc. Chem. Res. 1993, 26, 391-395.
10. M. M. Mader, P. A. Bartlett, Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 1281-1301.
11. H. D. Ulrich, E. Mundorff, B. D. Santarsiero, E. M. Driggers, R. C. Stevens, P. G. Schultz, Nature 1997, 389, 271-275.
12. E. C. Mundorff, M. A. Hanson, A. Varvak, H. Ulrich, P. G. Schultz, R. C. Stevens, Biochemistry 2000, 39, 627-632.
13. J. Villà, A. Warshel, J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 7887-7907.
14. T. C. Bruice, Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 139-148.
15. S. J. Benkovic, S. Hammes-Schiffer, Science 2003, 301, 1196-1202.
16. M. García-Viloca, J. Gao, M. Karplus, D. G. Truhlar, Science 2004, 303, 186-195.
17. P. G. Schultz, J. Yin, R. A. Lerner, Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 4607-4618; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 4427-4435.
18. P. G. Schultz, J. Yin, R. A. Lerner, Angew. Chem. 2002, 114, 4607-4618; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 4427-4435.
19. A. P. Marchand, R. E. Lehr, Pericyclic Reactions, Academic Press, New York, 1977.
20. From a computational point of view, the fact that no covalent bonds exist between the substrate and the catalytic antibody allows a clear separation between the QM region and the MM region. Problems arising from frontier treatments are thus avoided. This kind of system also permits a clear analysis of the different interaction energy terms between both subsystems.
21. T. Asada, H. Gouda, P. Kollman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12535-12542.
22. K. A. Black, A. G. Leach, M. Y. S. Kalani, K. N. Houk, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 9695-9708.
23. [32] plus the substrate (39 atoms) which was was treated by AM1 semiempirical Hamiltonian. Periodic boundary conditions were used in all calculations. Because of its size, only those CA atoms within 30 A of the substrate center of mass were allowed to move (∼11500 atoms, model dependent), and the positions of the remaining atoms were frozen.
24. [8] We think that this is a reasonable estimation of the expected error in the catalytic free energy barriers.
25. Once the full PMF values were obtained for the oxy-Cope rearrangement (Figure 1) MD trajectories of 1 ns were carried out in the region of the MC and TS (with constraints applied just in the reaction coordinate of the latter), as well as for the TSACA complexes. The values mentioned in the text come from the averaged distances obtained in these long QM/MM trajectories.
26. H. Baumann, P. Chen, Helv. Chim. Acta 2001, 84, 124-140.
27. F. Haeffner, K. N. Houk, Y. R. Reddy, L. A. Paquette, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 11880-11884.
28. M. Barbany, H. Gutiérrez-de-Terán, F. Sanz, J. Villà, A. Warshel, ChemBioChem 2003, 4, 277-285.
29. Critical analysis of antibody catalysis: D. Hilvert, Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2000, 69, 751-793.
30. -1).
31. P. Sabatier, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1911, 44, 1984.
32. S. Martí, M. Roca, J. Andrés, V. Moliner, E. Silla, I. Tuñón, J. Bertrán, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2004, 33, 98-107.
33. A. Warshel, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1978, 75, 5250-5254.
34. G. M. Torrie, J. P. Valleau, J. Comput. Phys. 1977, 23, 187-199.
35. M. J. Field, M. Albe, C. Bret, F. Proust-de Martin, A. Thomas, J. Comput, Chem. 2000, 21, 1088-1100.
36. W. D. Cornell, P. Cieplak, C. I. Bayly, I. R. Gould, K.M. Merz, Jr., D.M. Ferguson, D. C. Spellmeyer, T. Fox, J. W. Caldwell, P. A. Kollman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 5179-5197.
37. Gaussian03 (Revision A.1), M. J. Frisch, GW. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, V. G. Zakrzewski, J. A. Montgomery, Jr., R. E. Stratmann, J. C. Burant, S. Dapprich, J. M. Millam, A. D. Daniels, K. N. Kudin, M. C. Strain, O. Farkas, J. Tomasi, V. Barone, M. Cossi, R. Cammi, B. Mennucci, C. Pomelli, C. Adamo, S. Clifford, J. Ochterski, G. A. Petersson, P. Y. Ayala, Q. Cui, K. Morokuma, D. K. Malick, A. D. Rabuck, K. Raghavachari, J. B. Foresman, J. Cioslowski, J. V. Ortiz, B. B. Stefanov, G. Liu, A. Liashenko, P. Piskorz, I. Komaromi, R. Gomperts, R. L. Martin, D. J. Fox, T. Keith, M. A. Al-Laham, C. Y. Peng, A. Nanayakkara, C Gonzalez, M. Challacombe, P. M. W. Gill, B. Johnson, W. Chen, M. W. Wong, J. L. Andres, C. Gonzalez, M. Head-Gordon, E. S. Replogle, J. A. Pople, Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 2003.
38. S. Martí, J. Andrés, V. Moliner, E. Silla, I. Tuñón, J. Bertrán, M. J. Field, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 1709.