New modules for the repeated internal and N-terminal epitope tagging of genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Yeast

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 1-12

  Gauss, Robert ^a   Trautwein, Mark ^b   Sommer, Thomas ^a   Spang, Anne ^b  

^a MAX DELBRÜCK CENTER FOR MOLECULAR MEDICINE   (Germany)

^b FRIEDRICH MIESCHER LABORATORY OF THE MAX PLANCK SOCIETY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Epitope tagging; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Yeast

Indexed keywords

CRE RECOMBINASE; EPITOPE; FUNGAL PROTEIN; GLUTATHIONE TRANSFERASE; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; MYC PROTEIN;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CELL MEMBRANE; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURE MEDIUM; FUNGAL GENE; FUNGAL STRAIN; GENE CONSTRUCT; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC SELECTION; IMMUNOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; NONHUMAN; PLASMID; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BASE SEQUENCE; CHROMOSOMES, FUNGAL; EPITOPE MAPPING; GENES, FUNGAL; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PLASMIDS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TOBACCO ETCH VIRUS;

EID: 13444274743     PISSN: 0749503X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/yea.1187     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ausubel FM (ed.) 1993-2004. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. Wiley: New York.
2. Baudin A, Ozier-Kalogeropoulos O, Denouel A, Lacroute F, Cullin C. 1993. A simple and efficient method for direct gene deletion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 21: 3329-3330.
3. Biederer T, Volkwein C, Sommer T. 1996. Degradation of subunits of the Sec61p complex, an integral component of the ER membrane, by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. EMBO J 15: 2069-2076.
4. Biederer T, Volkwein C, Sommer T. 1997. Role of Cue1p in ubiquitination and degradation at the ER surface. Science 278 1806-1809.
5. De Antoni A, Gallwitz D. 2000. A novel multi-purpose cassette for repeated integrative epitope tagging of genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene 246: 179-185.
6. Delneri D, Tomlin GC, Wixon JL, et al. 2000. Exploring redundancy in the yeast genome: an improved strategy for use of the cre-loxP system. Gene 252: 127-135.
7. Gietz D, St Jean A, Woods RA, Schiestl RH. 1992. Improved method for high efficiency transformation of intact yeast cells. Nucleic Acids Res 20: 1425.
8. Goldstein AL, McCusker JH. 1999. Three new dominant drug resistance cassettes for gene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 15: 1541-1553.
9. Goldstein AL, Pan X, McCusker JH. 1999. Heterologous URA3MX cassettes for gene replacement in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 15: 507-511.
10. Guldener U, Heinisch J, Koehler GJ, Voss D, Hegemann JH. 2002. A second set of loxP marker cassettes for Cre-mediated multiple gene knockouts in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 30: e23.
11. Guldener U, Heck S, Fielder T, Beinhauer J, Hegemann JH. 1996. A new efficient gene disruption cassette for repeated use in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 24: 2519-2524.
12. Hiller MM, Finger A, Schweiger M, Wolf DH. 1996. ER degradation of a misfolded luminal protein by the cytosolic ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Science 273: 1725-1728.
13. Johnston M, Riles L, Hegemann JH. 2002. Gene disruption. Methods Enzymol 350: 290-315.
14. Knop M, Siegers K, Pereira G, et al. 1999. Epitope tagging of yeast genes using a PCR-based strategy: more tags and improved practical routines. Yeast 15: 963-972.
15. Laemmli UK. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227: 680-685.
16. Lafontaine D, Tollervey D. 1996. One-step PCR mediated strategy for the construction of conditionally expressed and epitope tagged yeast proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 24: 3469-3471.
17. Longtine MS, McKenzie A III, Demarini DJ, et al. 1998. Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14: 953-961.
18. Lorenz MC, Muir RS, Lim E, McElver J, Weber SC, Heitman J. 1995. Gene disruption with PCR products in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene 158: 113-117.
19. Manivasakam P, Weber SC, McElver J, Schiestl RH. 1995. Microhomology-mediated PCR targeting in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 23: 2799-2800.
20. Prein B, Natter K, Kohlwein SD. 2000. A novel strategy for constructing N-terminal chromosomal fusions to green fluorescent protein in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett 485: 29-34.
21. Puig O, Caspary F, Rigaut G, et al. 2001. The tandem affinity purification (TAP) method: a general procedure of protein complex purification. Methods 24: 218-229.
22. Puig O, Rutz B, Luukkonen BG, et al. 1998. New constructs and strategies for efficient PCR-based gene manipulations in yeast. Yeast 14: 1139-1146.
23. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Habor Laboratory Press: New York.
24. Sauer B. 1987. Functional expression of the cre-lox site-specific recombination system in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 7: 2087-2096.
25. Schneider BL, Seufert W, Steiner B, Yang QH, Futcher AB. 1995. Use of polymerase chain reaction epitope tagging for protein tagging in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 11: 1265-1274.
26. Swaffield JC, Melcher K, Johnston SA. 1996. A highly conserved ATPase protein as a mediator between acidic activation domains and the TATA-binding protein (correction). Nature 379: 658.
27. Wach A, Brachat A, Alberti-Segui C, Rebischung C, Philippsen P. 1997. Heterologous HIS3 marker and GFP reporter modules for PCR-targeting in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 13: 1065-1075.
28. Wach A, Brachat A, Pohlmann R, Philippsen P. 1994. New heterologous modules for classical or PCR-based gene disruptions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 10: 1793-1808.