Context effects in recognition memory: The role of familiarity and recollection

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 20-38

  McKenzie, Wendy A ^a   Tiberghien, Guy ^b  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

Context effects; Dual process theory; Familiarity; Process dissociation; Recognition memory; Recollection

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DISSOCIATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PSYCHOMETRY; RECALL; RECOGNITION;

EID: 1342291115     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00023-0     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Anderson J.R., Bower G.H. Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall. Psychological Review. 79:1972;97-123.
2. Baddeley A.D. Domains of recollection. Psychological Review. 89:1982;708-729.
3. Brainerd C.J., Reyna V.F., Kneer R. False recognition reversal: When similarity is distinctive. Journal of Memory and Language. 34:1995;157-185. doi:10.1006/jmla.1995.1008.
4. Buchner A., Erdfelder E., Vaterrodt-Plünnecke B. Toward unbiased measurement of conscious and unconscious memory processes within a process dissociation framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 124:1995;137-160.
5. Clark S.E., Gronlund S.D. Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 3:1996;37-60.
6. Content A., Mousty P., Radeau M. Brulex: Une base de données lexicales informatisée pour le français écrit et parlé [Brulex: A computerised lexical database for written and spoken French]. L'Année Psychologique. 90:1990;551-566.
7. Curran T., Hintzman D.L. Violations of the independence assumption in process dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 21:1995;531-547.
8. Fernandez A., Glenberg A.M. Changing environmental context does not reliably affect memory. Memory & Cognition. 13:1985;333-345.
9. Gillund G., Shiffrin R.M. A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review. 91:1984;1-67.
10. Godden D., Baddeley A.D. When does context influence recognition memory? British Journal of Psychology. 71:1980;99-104.
11. Graf P., Komatsu S. Process dissociation procedure: Handle with caution! European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 6:1994;113-120.
12. Hintzman D.L., Curran T. Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgments: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall. Journal of Memory and Language. 33:1994;1-18. doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1001.
13. Humphreys M.S. Relational information and the context effect in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition. 4:1976;221-232.
14. Jacoby L.L. A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language. 30:1991;513-541.
15. Jacoby L.L. Measuring recollection: Strategic vs automatic influences of associative context. Umilta C., Moscovitch M. Attention and performance. Vol. XV:1994;661-679 Bradford, Cambridge, MA.
16. Jacoby L.L. Dissociating automatic and consciously controlled effects of study/test compatibility. Journal of Memory and Language. 35:1996;32-52. doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.0003.
17. Jacoby, L. L. (1996b). Age-related differences in consciously controlled processes: Should I tip? Paper presented at the International Conference of Memory, Padua, Italy
18. Jacoby L.L., Begg I.M., Toth J.P. In defense of functional independence: Violations of assumptions underlying the process-dissociation procedure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 23:1997;484-495.
19. Jacoby L.L., Hay J.F. Age-related deficits in memory: Theory and application. Conway M.A., Gathercole S.E., Cornoldi C. Theories of memory. Vol. II:1998;111-134 Psychology Press.
20. Jacoby L.L., Toth J.P., Yonelinas A.P. Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 122:1993;139-154.
21. Joordens S., Merikle P.M. Independence or redundancy. Two models of conscious and unconscious influences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 122:1993;462-467.
22. Light L.L., Carter-Sobell L. Effects of changed semantic context on recognition memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 9:1970;1-11.
23. McElree B., Dolan P.O., Jacoby L.L. Isolating the contributions of familiarity and source information to item recognition: A time course analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 25:1999;563-582.
24. Macmillan N.A., Kaplan H.L. Detection theory analysis of group data: Estimating sensitivity from average hit and false-alarm rates. Psychological Bulletin. 98:1985;185-199.
25. Mandler G. Recognising: The judgement of previous occurrence. Psychological Review. 87:1980;252-271.
26. Mulligan N., Hirshman E. Speed-accuracy trade-offs and the dual process model of recognition memory. Journal of Memory and Language. 34:1995;1-18. doi:10.1006/jmla.1995.1001.
27. Murnane K., Phelps M.P. When does a different environmental context make a difference in recognition? A global activation model. Memory & Cognition. 22:1994;584-590.
28. Ratcliff R., Van Zandt T., McKoon G. Process dissociation, single-process theories, and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 124:1995;352-374.
29. Shiffrin R.M., Steyvers M. A model of recognition memory: REM - retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 4:1997;145-166.
30. Smith S.M., Vela E. Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin Review. 8:2001;203-220.
31. Snodgrass J.G., Corwin J. Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 117:1988;34-50.
32. Thomson D.M. Context effects in recognition memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 11:1972;789-793.
33. Tiberghien G. Contextual effects in face recognition: Some theoretical problems. Ellis H.D., Jeeves M.A., Newcombe F., Young A.W. Aspects of face processing. 1986;88-105 Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht.
34. Tiberghien G. La mémoire oubiliée [The forgotten memory]. 1997;Mardaga, Sprimont.
35. Tibergien G., Cauzinille E., Mathieu J. Pre-decision and conditional search in long term recognition memory. Acta Psychologica. 43:1979;329-343.
36. Toth J.P. Conceptual automaticity in recognition memory: Levels-of-processing effects on familiarity. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology. 50:1996;123-138.
37. Tulving E., Thomson D.M. Retrieval processes in recognition memory: Effects of associative context. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 87:1971;116-124.
38. Tulving E., Thomson D.M. Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in memory. Psychological Review. 80:1973;352-373.
39. Yonelinas A.P. Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 20:1994;1341-1354.
40. Yonelinas A.P., Jacoby L.L. Noncriterial recollection: Familiarity as automatic, irrelevant recollection. Consciousness and Cognition. 5:1996;131-141. doi:10.1006/ccog.1996.0008.
41. Yonelinas A.P., Jacoby L.L. Response bias and the process-dissociation procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 125:1996;422-434.
42. Yonelinas A.P., Regeher G., Jacoby L.L. Incorporating response bias in a dual-process theory of memory. Journal of Memory and Language. 34:1995;821-835. doi:10.1006/jmla.1995.1037.