Bone compaction enhances fixation of weightbearing titanium implants

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 431, Issue , 2005, Pages 138-144

  Kold, Søren ^a   Rahbek, Ole ^a   Vestermark, Marianne ^a   Overgaard, Søren ^b   Søballe, Kjeld ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE COMPACTION; BONE DENSITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOG; DRILL; ENERGY ABSORPTION; FEMALE; FEMUR CONDYLE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HYPOTHESIS; IMPLANT SURVIVAL; IN VIVO STUDY; JOINT PROSTHESIS; JOINT STABILITY; MALE; MATERIAL COATING; MORPHOMETRICS; NONHUMAN; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FIXATION; PROSTHESIS MATERIAL; SHEAR STRENGTH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; WEIGHT BEARING;

EID: 13244267040     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000150461.69142.f3     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Adrian MJ, Roy WE, Karpovich PV: Normal gait of the dog: An electrogoniometric study. Am J Vet Res 27:90-95, 1966.
2. Aerssens J, Boonen S, Lowet G, Dequeker J: Interspecies differences in bone composition, density, and quality: Potential implications for in vivo bone research. Endocrinology 139:663-670, 1998.
3. Altman DG: Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London, UK, Chapman and Hall/CRC 126, 1999.
4. Baddeley AJ, Gundersen HJ, Cruz-Orive LM: Estimation of surface area from vertical sections. J Microsc 142:259-276, 1986.
5. Bragdon CR, Burke D, Lowenstein JD, et al: Differences in stiffness of the interface between a cementless porous implant and cancellous bone in vivo in dogs due to varying amounts of implant motion. J Arthroplasty 11:945-951, 1996.
6. Bragdon CR, Doherty AM, Rubash HE, et al: The efficacy of BMP-2 to induce bone ingrowth in a total hip replacement model. Clin Orthop 417:50-61, 2003.
7. Breusch SJ, Norman TL, Revie IC, et al: Cement penetration in the proximal femur does not depend on broach surface finish. Acta Orthop Scand 72:29-35, 2001.
8. Cameron HU, Pilliar RM, Macnab I: The effect of movement on the bonding of porous metal to bone. J Biomed Mater Res 7:301-311, 1973.
9. Channer MA, Glisson RR, Seaber AV, Vail TP: Use of bone compaction in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 11:743-749, 1996.
10. Chareancholvanich K, Bourgeault C, Schmidt AH, Gustilo R, Lew W: In vitro stability of cemented and cementless femoral stems with compaction. Clin Orthop 394:290-302, 2002.
11. Dhert WJ, Thomsen P, Blomgren AK, et al: Integration of press-fit implants in cortical bone: A study on interface kinetics. J Biomed Mater Res 41:574-583, 1998.
12. Dhert WJ, Verheyen CC, Braak LH, et al: A finite element analysis of the push-out test: Influence of test conditions. J Biomed Mater Res 26:119-130, 1992.
13. Ding M, Odgaard A, Danielsen CC, Hvid I: Mutual associations among microstructural, physical and mechanical properties of human cancellous bone. J Bone Joint Surg 846:900-907, 2002.
14. Ducheyne P, De Meester P, Aernoudt E: Influence of a functional dynamic loading on bone ingrowth into surface pores of orthopedic implants. J Biomed Mater Res 11:811-838, 1977.
15. Einhorn TA: Enhancement of fracture-healing. J Bone Joint Surg 77A:940-956, 1995.
16. Gotfredsen K, Budtz-Jorgensen E, Jensen LN: A method for preparing and staining histological sections containing titanium implants for light microscopy. Stain Technol 64:121-127, 1989.
17. Green JR, Nemzek JA, Arnoczky SP, Johnson LL, Balas MS: The effect of bone compaction on early fixation of porous-coated implants. J Arthroplasty 14:91-97, 1999.
18. Gundersen HJ, Bendtsen TF, Korbo L, et al: Some new, simple and efficient stereological methods and their use in pathological research and diagnosis. APMIS 96:379-394, 1988.
19. Heck DA, Nakajima I, Kelly PJ, Chao EY: The effect of load alteration on the biological and biomechanical performance of a titanium fiber-metal segmental prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg 68A: 118-126, 1986.
20. Hofmann AA, Plaster RL, Murdock LE: Subvastus (Southern) approach for primary total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 269:70-77, 1991.
21. Hollister SJ, Guldberg RE, Kuelske CL, et al: Relative effects of wound healing and mechanical stimulus on early bone response to porous-coated implants. J Orthop Res 14:654-662, 1996.
22. Howard JL, Hui AJ, Bourne RB, et al: A quantitative analysis of bone support comparing cementless tapered and distal fixation total hip replacements. J Arthroplasty 19:266-273, 2004.
23. Jasty M, Bragdon C, Burke D, et al: In vivo skeletal responses to porous-surfaced implants subjected to small induced motions. J Bone Joint Surg 79A:707-714, 1997.
24. Jensen TB, Overgaard S, Lind M, et al: Osteogenic protein 1 device increases bone formation and bone graft resorption around cementless implants. Acta Orthop Scand 73:31-39, 2002.
25. Karrholm J, Herberts P, Hultmark P, et al: Radiostereometry of hip prostheses: Review of methodology and clinical results. Clin Orthop 344:94-110, 1997.
26. Kienapfel H, Sumner DR, Turner TM, Urban RM, Galante JO: Efficacy of autograft and freeze-dried allograft to enhance fixation of porous coated implants in the presence of interface gaps. J Orthop Res 10:423-433, 1992.
27. Kimmel DB, Jee WS: A quantitative histologic study of bone turnover in young adult beagles. Anat Rec 203:31-45, 1982.
28. Kold S, Bechtold JE, Ding M, et al: Compacted cancellous bone has a spring-back effect. Acta Orthop Scand 74:591-595, 2003.
29. Kold S, Mouzin O, Bourgeault C, Soballe K, Bechtold JE: Femoral fracture risk in hip arthroplasty: Smooth versus toothed instruments. Clin Orthop 408:180-188, 2003.
30. Lind M, Overgaard S, Glerup H, Soballe K, Bunger C: Transforming growth factor-beta1 adsorped to tricalciumphosphate coated implants increases peri-implant bone remodeling. Biomaterials 22:189-193, 2001.
31. Mouzin O, Soballe K, Bechtold JE: Loading improves anchorage of hydroxyapatite implants more than titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res 58:61-68, 2001.
32. Overgaard S, Soballe K, Gundersen HJ: Efficiency of systematic sampling in histomorphometric bone research illustrated by hydroxyapatite-coated implants: Optimizing the stereological vertical-section design. J Orthop Res 18:313-321, 2000.
33. Paul HA, Bargar WL, Mittlestadt B, et al: Development of a surgical robot for cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 285:57-66, 1992.
34. Pilliar RM, Lee JM, Maniatopoulos C: Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin Orthop 298:108-113, 1986.
35. Ryd L, Albrektsson BE, Carlsson L, et al: Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as a predictor of mechanical loosening of knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg 77B:377-383, 1995.
36. Schimmel JW, Huiskes R: Primary fit of the Lord cementless total hip: A geometric study in cadavers. Acta Orthop Scand 59:638-642, 1988.
37. Soballe K, Hansen ES, Rasmussen H, Jorgensen PH, Bunger C: Tissue ingrowth into titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated implants during stable and unstable mechanical conditions. J Orthop Res 10:285-299, 1992.
38. Sumner DR, Turner TM, Urban RM, et al: Locally delivered rhBMP-2 enhances bone ingrowth and gap healing in a canine model. J Orthop Res 22:58-65, 2004.
39. Turner TM, Urban RM, Sumner DR, Galante JO: Revision, without cement, of aseptically loose, cemented total hip prostheses: Quantitative comparison of the effects of four types of medullary treatment on bone ingrowth in a canine model. J Bone Joint Surg 75A: 845-862, 1993.
40. Wang JS, Tagil M, Aspenberg P: Load-bearing increases new bone formation in impacted and morselized allografts. Clin Orthop 378:274-281, 2000.
41. Wolff J: The Law of Bone Remodelling (Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen). Translated by Maquet P, Furlong R. Berlin, Springer 1986.