Compacted cancellous bone has a spring-back effect

Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica

Volumn 74, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 591-595

  Kold, Søren ^a,b   Bechtold, Joan E ^b   Ding, Ming ^a   Chareancholvanich, Keerati ^b   Rahbek, Ole ^a   Søballe, Kjeld ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b MINNEAPOLIS MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CANCELLOUS BONE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEATH; DOG; FEMUR CONDYLE; IMPLANT; IN VIVO STUDY; NONHUMAN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ANIMALS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DOGS; OSSEOINTEGRATION; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION;

EID: 0142209287     PISSN: 00016470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016470310018018     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Aerssens J, Boonen S, Lowet G, Dequeker J. Interspecies differences in bone composition, density, and quality: potential implications for in vivo bone research. Endocrinology 1998; 139: 663-70.
2. Bragdon C R, Burke D, Lowenstein J D, O'Connor D O, Ramamurti B, Jasty M, Harris W H. Differences in stiffness of the interface between a cementless porous implant and cancellous bone in vivo in dogs due to varying amounts of implant motion. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11: 945-51.
3. Cameron H U, Pilliar R M, Macnab I. The effect of movement on the bonding of porous metal to bone. J Biomed Mater Res 1973; 7: 301-11.
4. Channer M A, Glisson R R, Seaber A V, Vail T P. Use of bone compaction in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11: 743-9.
5. Chareancholvanich K, Bourgeault C, Schmidt A H, Gustilo R, Lew W. In vitro stability of cemented and cementless femoral stems with compaction. Clin Orthop 2002; 394: 290-302.
6. Ding M, Danielsen C C, Hvid I. Bone density does not reflect mechanical properties in early-stage arthrosis. Acta Orthop Scand 2001; 72: 181-5.
7. Ducheyne P, De Meester P, Aernoudt E. Influence of a functional dynamic loading on bone ingrowth into surface pores of orthopedic implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1977; 11: 811-38.
8. Gibson L J. The mechanical behaviour of cancellous bone. J Biomech 1985; 18: 317-28.
9. Gotfredsen K, Budtz-Jorgensen E, Jensen LN. A method for preparing and staining histological sections containing titanium implants for light microscopy. Stain Technol 1989; 64: 121-7.
10. Green J R, Nemzek J A, Arnoczky S P, Johnson L L, Balas M S. The effect of bone compaction on early fixation of porous-coated implants. J Arthroplasty 1999; 14: 91-7.
11. Harrigan T P, Harris W H. A finite element study of the effect of diametral interface gaps on the contact areas and pressures in uncemented cylindrical femoral total hip components. J Biomech 1991; 24: 87-91.
12. Heck D A, Nakajima I, Kelly P J, Chao E Y. The effect of load alteration on the biological and biomechanical performance of a titanium fiber-metal segmental prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1986; 68: 118-26.
13. Hofmann A A, Plaster R L, Murdock L E. Subvastus (Southern) approach for primary total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1991; 269: 70-7.
14. Jasty M, Bragdon C, Burke D, O'Connor D, Lowenstein J, Harris W H. In vivo skeletal responses to porous-surfaced implants subjected to small induced motions. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1997; 79: 707-14.
15. Kärrholm J, Herberts P, Hultmark P, Malchau H, Nivbrant B, Thanner J. Radiostereometry of hip prostheses. Review of methodology and clinical results. Clin Orthop 1997; 344: 94-110.
16. Kold S, Rahbek O, Toft M, Overgaard S, Søballe K. Compaction of existing cancellous bone enhances mechanical fixation of hydroxyapatite-coated implants. An experimental weight-bearing canine study. Submitted 2002a.
17. Kold S, Rahbek O, Toft M, Overgaard S, Søballe K. Compaction of existing cancellous bone enhances mechanical fixation of weight-bearing titanium implants. An experimental canine study. Submitted 2002b.
18. Linde F. Elastic and viscoelastic properties of trabecular bone by a compression testing approach. Dan Med Bull 1994; 41: 119-38.
19. Linde F, Gothgen C B, Hvid I, Pongsoipetch B. Mechanical properties of trabecular bone by a non-destructive compression testing approach. Eng Med 1988; 17: 23-9.
20. Lucht U. The Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71: 433-9.
21. Paul H A, Bargar W L, Mittlestadt B, Musits B, Taylor R H, Kazanzides P, Zuhars J, Williamson B, Hanson W. Development of a surgical robot for cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1992; 285: 57-66.
22. Pilliar R M, Lee J M, Maniatopoulos C. Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous- surfaced implants. Clin Orthop 1986; 298: 108-13.
23. Ruegsegger P, Koller B, Muller R. A microtomographic system for the nondestructive evaluation of bone architecture. Calcif Tissue Int 1996; 58: 24-9.
24. Russ J C. Computer-assisted microscopy. The measurement and analysis of images. Plenum Press, New York 1990.
25. Ryd L, Albrektsson B E, Carlsson L, Dansgard F, Herberts P, Lindstrand A, Regner L, Toksvig-Larsen S. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as a predictor of mechanical loosening of knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1995; 77: 377-83.
26. Sandborn P M, Cook S D, Spires W P, Kester M A. Tissue response to porous-coated implants lacking initial bone apposition. J Arthroplasty 1988; 3: 337-46.
27. Schimmel J W, Huiskes R. Primary fit of the Lord cementless total hip. A geometric study in cadavers. Acta Orthop Scand 1988; 59: 638-42.
28. Søballe K, Hansen E S, Rasmussen H, Jorgensen P H, Bunger C. Tissue ingrowth into titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated implants during stable and unstable mechanical conditions. J Orthop Res 1992; 10: 285-99.
29. Ullmark G, Nilsson O. Impacted corticocancellous allografts: recoil and strength. J Arthroplasty 1999; 14: 1019-23.