A quantitative analysis of bone support comparing cementless tapered and distal fixation total hip replacements

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 266-273

  Howard, James L ^b   Hui, Andrew J ^b   Bourne, Robert B ^a   McCalden, Richard W ^b   MacDonald, Steven J ^b   Rorabeck, Cecil H ^b  

^a LONDON HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Bone prosthesis contact area; Cementless femoral stem fixation; Computed tomography; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCELLOUS BONE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMPLANTATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PROSTHESIS FIXATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ALGORITHMS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BIOMECHANICS; BONE CEMENTS; CADAVER; FEMUR; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED;

EID: 1942422303     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2003.09.011     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Feng Z., Ziv I., Rho J. The accuracy of computed tomography-based linear measurements of human femora and titanium stem. Invest Radiol. 31:1996;333.
2. Feng Z., Ziv I., Rho J., et al. Effects of titanium prosthesis, offset and size of field of view on bone mineral density measurements using quantitative computed tomography. Br J Radiol. 73:2000;498.
3. Laine H.J., Kontola K., Lehto M.U., et al. Image processing for femoral endosteal anatomy detection description and testing of a computed tomography based program. Phys Med Biol. 42:1997;673.
4. Laine H.J., Pajamaki K.J., Moilanen T., et al. The femoral canal fill of two different cementless stem designs. The accuracy of radiographs compared to computed tomographic scanning. Int Orthop. 25:2001;209.
5. Rubin P.J., Leyvraz P.F., Aubaniac J.M., et al. The morphology of the proximal femur. A three-dimensional radiographic analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 74:1992;28.
6. Valdivia G.G., Dunbar M.J., Parker D.A., et al. The John Charnley award three-dimensional analysis of the cement mantle in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 393:2001;38.
7. Rorabeck C.H., Bourne R.B., Mulliken B.D., et al. The Nicolas Andry award comparative results of cemented and cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 325:1996;330.
8. Knight J.L., Atwater R.D. Preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Quantitating its utility and precision. J Arthroplasty. 7:(suppl):1992;403.
9. Lobregt S., Viergever M.A. A discrete dynamic contour model. Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers. 14:1995;12.
10. McInerney T., Terzopoulos D. Deformable models in medical image analysis a survey. Med Image Anal. 1:1996;91.
11. Engh C.A., Massin P. Cementless total hip arthroplasty using the anatomic medullary locking stem. Results using a survivorship analysis. Clin Orthop. 1989;141.
12. Dalton J.E., Cook S.D., Thomas K.A., et al. The effect of operative fit and hydroxyapatite coating on the mechanical and biological response to porous implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 77:1995;97.
13. Sandborn P.M., Cook S.D., Spires W.P., Kester M.A. Tissue response to porous-coated implants lacking initial bone apposition. J Arthroplasty. 3:1988;337.
14. Eckrich S.G., Noble P.C., Tullos H.S. Effect of rotation on the radiographic appearance of the femoral canal. J Arthroplasty. 9:1994;419.
15. Robertson D.D., Weiss P.J., Fishman E.K., et al. Evaluation of CT techniques for reducing artifacts in the presence of metallic orthopedic implants. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 12:1988;236.
16. Sutherland C.J., Gayou D.E. Artifacts and thresholding in x-ray CT of a cortical bone and titanium composite. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 20:1996;496.
17. Campbell A.C., Rorabeck C.H., Bourne R.B., Chess D., Nott L. Thigh pain after cementless hip arthroplasty. Annoyance or ill omen. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 74:1992;63.
18. Sumner D.R., Galante J.O. Determinants of stress shielding design versus materials versus interface. Clin Orthop. 274:1992;202.