A development research agenda for online collaborative learning

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 53-65

  Reeves, Thomas C ^a   Herrington, Jan ^b   Oliver, Ron ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

^c EDITH COWAN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 12744279891     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02504718     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2003). Sizing the opportunity: The quality and extent of online education in the United States, 2002 and 2003. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium. Report retrieved December 12, 2003 from http://www.sloam-c.org/resources/sizing_oppor tunity.pdf.
2. Anderson, T. (2003). Modes of interaction in distance education: Recent developments and research questions. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 129-144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Bannan-Ritland, B. (2003). The role of design in research: The integrative learning design framework. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 21-24.
4. Barab, S. A., Squire, K. D., & Dueber, W. (2000). A coevolutionary model for supporting the emergence of authenticity. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 37-62.
5. Bernard, R. M., Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., Wozney, L., Borokhovski, E., Wallet, P. A., Wade, A., & Fiset, M. (2003, April). How does distance education compare to classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. Paper retrieved October 5, 2003 from http://doe.concordia.ca/cslp/.
6. Bonk, C.J., & Dennen, V. (2003). Frameworks for research, design, benchmarks, training, and pedagogy in Web-based distance education. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 331-348). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Boshier, R., Mohapi, M., Moulton, G., Qayyum, A., Sadownik, L., & Wilson, M. (1997). Best and worst dressed Web lessons: Strutting into the 21st century in comfort and style. Distance Education, 18(1), 327-349.
8. Bottge, B. A., & Hasselbring, T. S. (1993). Taking word problems off the page. Educational Leadership, 50(7), 36-38.
9. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Book retrieved September 4, 2003 from http://www.nap.edu/catalog/9853.html.
10. Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R. D., Hasselbring, T. S., Kinzer, C. K., & Williams, S. M. (1990). Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 115-141). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Bransford, J. D., Vye, N., Kinzer, C., & Risko, V. (1990). Teaching thinking and content knowledge: Toward an integrated approach. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 381-413). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Britto, M. (2002). An exploratory study of the development of a survey instrument to measure the pedagogical dimensions of Web-based instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Georgia.
13. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 38(1), 32-42.
14. Cavanaugh, C. S. (2001). The effectiveness of interactive distance education technologies in K-12 learning: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7(1), 73-88.
15. Cheng, H-C., Lehman, J., Armstrong, P. (1991). Comparison of performance and attitude in traditional and computer conference classes. The American Journal of Distance Education, 5(3), 51-64.
16. Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445-459.
17. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990a). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 19(6), 2-10.
18. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990b). Technology and the design of generative learning environments. Educational Technology, 31(5), 34-40.
19. Crook, C. (2002). Learning as cultural practice. In. M. Lea and K. Nicoll (Eds.), Understanding distributed learning (pp. 152-169). London: Routledge Palmer.
20. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2003). The landscape of qualitative research: Theories and issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
22. Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8.
23. DiBiase, D. (2000). Is distance teaching more work or less? American Journal of Distance Education, 14(3), 6-20.
24. Duchastel, P. C. (1997). A Web-based model for university instruction. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 25(3), 221-228.
25. Duderstadt, J. J., Atkins, D. E., Van Houweling, D. (2002). Higher education in the digital age: Technology issues and strategies for American colleges and universities. Westport, CT: American Council on Education and Praeger.
26. Feuer, M. J., Towne, L., & Shavelson, R. J. (2002). Scientific culture and educational research. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 4-14.
27. Gordon, R. (1998). Balancing real-world problems with real-world results. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 390-393.
28. Green, K. (2001). Campus computing report 2001. Encino, CA: The Campus Computing Project. Report retrieved December 9, 2003 from http://www.campuscomputing.net/.
29. Hara, N., & Kling, R. (1999). Students' frustrations with a Web-based distance education course. First Monday, 4(12). Article retrieved October 10, 2003 from http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue4_12/hara/.
30. Harasim, L. (2002). What makes online learning communities successful: The role of collaborative learning in social and intellectual development. In C. Vrasidas and G. V. Glass (Eds.), Distance education and distributed learning (181-200). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
31. Herrington, J., & Herrington, A. (1998). Authentic assessment and multimedia: How university students respond to a model of authentic assessment. Higher Education Research and Development, 17(3), 305-322.
32. Herrington, J., Oliver, R., & Reeves, T. C. (2003). Patterns of engagement in authentic online learning environments. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 59-71.
33. Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C., Oliver, R., & Woo, Y. (2004). Designing authentic activities in Web-based courses. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(1), 3-29.
34. Jonassen, D. (1991). Evaluating constructivistic learning. Educational Technology, 31(9), 28-33.
35. Jonassen, D. H., & Reeves, T. C. (1996). Learning with Technology: Using Computers as cognitive tools. In D. H. Jonassen, (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 693-719). New York: Macmillan.
36. Kearsley, G. (2000). Online education: Learning and teaching in cyberspace. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth /Thomson Learning.
37. Kelly, A. E. (2003). Research as design. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 3-4.
38. Kirschner, P. A., & Kreijns, K. (2004). The sociability of computer-mediated collaborative learning environments: Pitfalls of social interaction and how to avoid them. In R. Bromme, F. Hesse, & H. Spada (Eds.). Barriers and biases in computer-mediated knowledge communication - And how they may be overcome. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer.
39. Koory, M. A. (2003). Differences in learning outcomes for the online and F2F versions of "An Introduction to Shakespeare." Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(2). Article retrieved January 5, 2004 from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v7n2/pdf/v7n2_koory.pdf.
40. Lagemann, E. C. (2000). An elusive science: The troubling history of educational research. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
41. Lajoie, S. P. (Ed.). (2000). Computers as cognitive tools: No more walls. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42. Lebow, D., & Wager, W. W. (1994). Authentic activity as a model for appropriate learning activity: Implications for emerging instructional technologies. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 23(3), 231-244.
43. Lockee, B., Moore, D., & Burton, J. (2004). Foundations of programmed instruction. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 545-569). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
44. Lumsdaine, A. A. (1963). Instruments and media of instruction. In N. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally.
45. MacDonald, M., & Bartlett, J. E. (2000). Comparison of Web-based and traditional delivery methods in a business communications unit. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 42(2), 90-100.
46. Machtmes, K. & Asher, J. W. (2000). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of telecourses in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 14(1), 27-46.
47. Mielke, K. W. (1968). Questioning the questions of ETV research. Educational Broadcasting, 2, 6-15.
48. Moore, M. G., & Anderson, W. G. (Eds.). (2003). Hand-book of distance education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
49. Myers, S. (1993). A trial for Dmitri Karamazov. Educational Leadership, 50(7), 71-72.
50. Naidu, S. (2003). Designing instruction for e-learning environments. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 349-365). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
51. National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Report retrieved August 23, 2003 from http://www.nap.edu/.
52. Noble, D. F. (2001). Digital diploma mills: The automation of higher education. New York: Monthly Review Press.
53. Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
54. Orrill, C. H., Hannafin, M. J., & Glazer, E. M. (2004). Disciplined inquiry and the study of emerging technology. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 335-353). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
55. Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in Cyberspace. San Francisco, CA: JosseyBass.
56. Perkins, D. N. (1986). Knowledge as design. Hillsdale, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
57. Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (1999). What's the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Washington, DC: The Institute for Higher Education Policy. Report retrieved October 5, 2003 from http://www.ihep.com/Pubs/PDF/Difference.pdf.
58. Pittinsky, M. S. (Ed.). (2003). The wired tower: Perspectives on the impact of the internet on higher education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
59. Reeves, T. C. (1993). Pseudoscience in computer-based instruction: The case of learner control research. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 20(2), 39-46.
60. Reeves, T. C. (2002). Distance education and the professorate: The issue of productivity. In C. Vrasidas and G. V. Glass (Eds.), Distance education and distributed learning (135-156). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
61. Reeves, T. C. (2003). Storm clouds on the digital education horizon. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 25(1), 3-26.
62. Reeves, T. C., & Okey, J. R. (1996). Alternative assessment for constructivist learning environments. In B. G. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 191-202). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
63. Reeves, T. C., & Reeves, P. M. (1997). The effective dimensions of interactive learning on the WWW. In B. H. Khan, (Ed.), Web-based instruction (pp. 59-66). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
64. Resnick, L. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16(9), 13-20.
65. Ross, S. M., & Morrison, G. R. (2004). Experimental research methods. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 1021-1043). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
66. Saettler, P. (1990). The evolution of American educational technology. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
67. Sammons, M. (2003). Exploring the new conception of teaching and learning in distance education. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 387-397). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
68. Schank, R. C. (2002). Designing world-class e-learning. How IBM, GE, Harvard Business School, and Columbia University are succeeding at e-leaming. New York: McGraw Hill.
69. Schramm, W. (1977). Big media, little media. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
70. Seels, B., Fullerton, K., Berry, L., & Horn, L. J. (2004). Research on learning from television. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 249-334). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
71. Shulman, L. (2001), Inventing the future. In P. Hutchings (Ed), Opening lines: Approaches to the scholarship of teaching and learning. Menlo Park, CA: Carnegie Publications.
72. Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur's quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
73. Twigg, C. A. (2003). Quality, cost and access: The case for redesign. In M. S. Pittinsky (Ed.), The wired tower: Perspectives on the impact of the Internet on higher education (pp. 111-143). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
74. van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In J. van den Akker, N. Nieveen, R. M. Branch, K. L. Gustafson, & T. Plomp, (Eds.), Design methodology and developmental research in education and training (pp. 1-14). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
75. Vonderwell, S. (2003). An examination of asynchronous communication experiences and perspectives of students in an online course: A case study. Internet and Higher Education, 6, 77-90.
76. Weigel, V. B. (2002). Deep learning for a digital age: Technology's untapped potential to enrich higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
77. Wilson, B. G. (Ed.). (1996). Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design. Engle-wood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
78. Winn, W. (1993). Instructional design and situated learning: Paradox or partnership. Educational Technology, 33(3), 16-21.
79. Young, M. F. (1993). Instructional design for situated learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(1), 43-58.
80. Young, M. F. (1995). Assessment of situated learning using computer environments. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 4(1), 89-96.
81. Young, M. F., & McNeese, M. (1993). A situated cognition approach to problem solving with implications for computer-based learning and assessment. In G. Salvendy & M. J. Smith (Eds.), Human-computer interaction: Software and hardware interfaces (pp. 825-830). New York: Elsevier Science Publishers.