Storms clouds on the digital education horizon

Journal of Computing in Higher Education

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 3-26

  Reeves, Thomas C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

accreditation; assessment; development research; online teaching; pedagogy

Indexed keywords

EID: 12744274266     PISSN: 10421726     EISSN: 18671233     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02940850     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Accrediting Commission of the Distance Education and Training Council. (2003). Accreditation handbook. Washington, DC: Distance Education and Training Council. [Online]. Available: http://www. detc. org/content/acredditHandbk. html.
2. American Federation of Teachers. (2000). Making decisions about post-tenure review: An issues brief by the higher education program and policy council. [Online]. Available: http://www. aft. org/higher_ed/downloadable/posttenure. pdf [2001, December].
3. Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
4. Britto, M. (2002). An exploratory study of the development of a survey instrument to measure the pedagogical dimensions of web-based instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Georgia.
5. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
6. Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445-459.
7. Cohen, D. (2001, October). Quality control or hindering quality?The Chronicle of Higher Education. [Online]. Available: http://chronicle. com/.
8. Collins, A. (1992). Towards a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O'Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15-22). Berlin: Springer.
9. Collis, B., Winnips, K., & Moonen, J. (2000). Structured support versus learner choice via the World Wide Web (WWW): Where is the payoff?Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11(2), 163-196.
10. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. Daniel, J. (2000). The future of online learning. [Online]. Available: http://www. open. ac. uk/vcs-speeches/Toronto. htm.
12. DiBiase, D. (2000) Is distance teaching more work or less?American Journal of Distance Education, 14(3), 6-20.
13. Driscoll, M. P. (1999). Psychology of learning for instruction (2nd Ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
14. Eaton, J. A. (2001). Distance learning: Academic and political challenges for higher education accreditation (CHEA Monograph Series No. 1). Washington, DC: Council for Higher Education Accreditation.
15. Fabos, B., & Young, M. D. (1999). Telecommunications in the classroom: Rhetoric versus reality. Review of Educational Research, 69(3), 217-259.
16. Fairweather, J. S. (1999). The highly productive faculty member: Confronting the mythologies of faculty work. In W. G. Tierney (Ed.), Faculty productivity: Facts, fictions, and issues (pp. 55-98). New York: Falmer Press.
17. Farrell, E. F. (2002, October). University of Phoenix sees surge in revenues and enrollmentsThe Chronicle of Higher Education. [Online]. Available: http://chronicle. com.
18. Gomory, R. E. (2000, January 11). Internet learning: Is it real and what does it mean for universities [Online]. Available: http://www. eng. yale. edu/sheff/Gomory_talk. htm [2001, April].
19. Herrington, J. (1997). Authentic learning in interactive multimedia environments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Edith Cowan University, Western Australia.
20. Herrington, J., Oliver, R., & Reeves, T. C. (2002). Patterns of engagement in authentic online learning environments. In A. Williamson, C. Gunn, A. Young, & T. Clear. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE) (pp. 279-286). Auckland, New Zealand: UNITEC.
21. Huber, R. M. (1992). How professors play the cat guarding the cream: Why we're paying more and getting less in higher education. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press.
22. Kearsley, G. (2000). Online education: Learning and teaching in cyberspace. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
23. Lagemann, E. C. (2000). An elusive science: The troubling history of educational research. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
24. Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: A framework for the effective use of learning technologies. London: Routledge/Falmer.
25. Lee, J. (2002). Faculty and administrator perceptions of instructional support for distance education. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(1), 27-46.
26. Leef, G. C., & Burris, R. D. (2002). Can college accreditation live up to its promises? Washington, DC: The American Council of Trustees and Alumni (ACTA). [Online]. Available: http://www. goacta. org/Reports/accrediting. pdf [2002, October].
27. Levine, A. (2003). Higher education: A revolution externally, evolution internally. In M. S. Pittinsky (Ed.), The wired tower: Perspectives on the impact of the internet on higher education (pp. 13-39). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28. Lucas, C. J. (1996). Crisis in the academy: Rethinking higher education in America. New York: St. Martin's Press.
29. Lynch, M. M. (2002). The online educator: A guide to creating the virtual classroom. London: Routledge/Falmer.
30. Middaugh, M. F. (2001). Understanding faculty productivity: Standards and benchmarks for colleges and universities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31. Miller, D. W. (1999, August 6). The black hole of educational research: Why do academic studies play such a minimal role in efforts to improve the schools?The Chronicle of Higher Education. [Online]. Available: http://chronicle. com.
32. stcentury. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books.
33. Morgan, R. (2002, October). Lawmakers call for more accountability from accreditation system. The Chronicle of Higher Education. [Online]. Available: http://chronicle. com.
34. Neuhauser, C. (2002). Learning style and effectiveness of online and face-to-face instruction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 99-113.
35. Newman, D. (1990). Opportunities for research on the organizational impact of school computers. Educational Researcher, 19(3), 8-13.
36. Noble, D. F. (2001). Digital diploma mills: The automation of higher education. New York: Monthly Review Press.
37. Oliver, R., & Herrington, J. (2002)Teaching and learning online: A beginner's guide to e-learning and e-teaching in higher education. Mt. Lawley, Western Australia: Centre for Research in Information Technology and Communications, Edith Cowan University.
38. Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2001). Lessons from the cyberspace classroom: The realities of online teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
39. Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
40. Paris, D. C. (2001). Is there a professor in this class? In R. A. Cole (Ed.), Issues in web-based pedagogy: A critical primer (pp. 95-110). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
41. Paulson, K. W. (2002). Reconfiguring faculty roles for virtual settings. Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 123-140.
42. Pittinsky, M. S. (Ed.). (2003). The wired tower: Perspectives on the impact of the internet on higher education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
43. Postman, N. (2003). Questioning media. In M. S. Pittinsky (Ed.), The wired tower: Perspectives on the impact of the internet on higher education (pp. 181-200). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
44. Reeves, T. C. (2000). Socially responsible educational technology research. Educational Technology, 40(6), 19-28.
45. Reeves, T. C. (1993). Pseudoscience in computer-based instruction: The case of learner control research. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 20(2), 39-46.
46. Reeves, T. C., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2002). Authentic activities and online learning. In A. Goody, J. Herrington, & M. Northcote (Eds.), Quality conversations: Research and Development in Higher Education, Volume 25 (pp. 562-567). Jamison, ACT: HERDSA.
47. Russell, T. L. (1999). The no significant difference phenomenon. Montgomery, AL: International Distance Education Certification Center.
48. Salmon, G. (2002). E-tivities: The key to active online learning. London: Kogan Page.
49. Schank, R. C. (2002). Designing world-class e-learning. How IBM, GE, Harvard Business School, and Columbia University are succeeding at e-learning. New York: McGraw Hill.
50. Shulman, L. (2000). Inventing the future. In P. Hutchings (Ed). Opening lines: Approaches to the scholarship of teaching and learning. Menlo Park, CA: Carnegie Publications. Available online at: http://www. carnegiefoundation. org/elibrary/docs/inventing. htm.
51. Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur's quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
52. Stoll, C. (1999). High tech heretic: Why computers don't belong in the classroom and other reflections by a computer contrarian. New York: Doubleday.
53. Twigg, C. A. (2003). Quality, cost and access: The case for redesign. In M. S. Pittinsky (Ed.), The wired tower: Perspectives on the impact of the internet on higher education (pp. 111-143). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
54. van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In J. van den Akker, N. Nieveen, R. M. Branch, K. L. Gustafson, & T. Plomp, (Eds.), Design methodology and developmental research in education and training (pp. 1-14). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
55. Weigel, V. B. (2002). Deep learning for a digital age: Technology's untapped potential to enrich higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
56. Young, J. R. (2002, May). The 24-hour professor. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved online at http://chronicle. com.