Population differentiation and hybrid success in Campanula americana: Geography and genome size

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 81-89

  Galloway, L F ^a   Etterson, J R ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Cytoplasmic nuclear interaction; Genome size; Intraspecific hybridization; Outbreeding depression; Population differentiation; Tetraploid

Indexed keywords

FITNESS; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENETIC DRIFT; HYBRIDIZATION; INTERPOPULATION VARIATION; POPULATION GENETICS;

ARTICLE; CAMPANULACEAE; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; GENOME; HYBRIDIZATION; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

CAMPANULACEAE; EVOLUTION; GENOME; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

CAMPANULA; CAMPANULASTRUM AMERICANUM; EMBRYOPHYTA;

EID: 12744261317     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00801.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Affre, L. & Thompson, J.D. 1999. Variation in self-fertility, inbreeding depression and levels of inbreeding in four Cyclamen species. J Evol. Biol. 12: 113-122.
2. Armbruster, P., Bradshaw, W.E. & Holzapel, C.M. 1997. Evolution of the genetic architecture underlying fitness in the pitcher-plant mosquito, Wyoemyia smithii. Evolution 51: 451-458.
3. Bennetzen, J.L. 2002. Mechanisms and rates of genome expansion and contraction in flowering plants. Genetics 115: 29-36.
4. Burke, J.M., Voss, T.J. & Arnold, M.L. 1998. Genetic interactions and natural selection in Louisiana Iris hybrids. Evolution 52: 1304-1310.
5. Campbell, D.R. & Waser, N.M. 2001. Genotype-by-environment interaction and the fitness of plant hybrids in the wild. Evolution 55: 669-676.
6. Costich, D.E., Meagher, T.M. & Yurkow, E.J. 1991. A rapid means of sex identification in Silene latifolia by use of flow cytometry. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 9: 359-369.
7. Coyne, J.A. & Orr, H.A. 1998. The evolutionary genetics of speciation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353: 287-305.
8. Edmands, S. 1999. Heterosis and outbreeding depression in interpopulation crosses spanning a wide range of divergence. Evolution 53: 1757-1768.
9. Edmands, S. 2002. Does parental divergence predict reproductive compatibility? Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 520-527.
10. Edmands, S. & Burton, R.S. 1999. Cytochrome-c oxidase activity in interpopulation hybrids of the marine copepod Tigriopus californicus: a test for nuclear-nuclear or nuclear-cytoplasmic coadaptation. Evolution 53: 1972-1978.
11. Etterson, J.R. & Galloway, L.F. 2002. The influence of light on paternal plants in Campanula americana (Campanulaceae): pollen characteristics and offspring traits. Am. J. Bot. 89: 1899-1906.
12. Fenster, C.B. & Galloway, L.F. 2000a. Population differentiation in an annual legume: genetic architecture. Evolution 54: 1157-1172.
13. Fenster, C. B. & Galloway, L.F. 2000b. Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in natural populations of Chamaecrista fasciculata (Fabaceae): consequences for conservation biology. Conservation Biology 14: 1406-1412.
14. Fischer, M. & Matthias, D. 1997. Mating structure and inbreeding and outbreeding depression in the rare plant Gentianella germanica (Gentianaceae). Am. J. Bot. 84: 1685-1692.
15. Fishman, L. & Willis, J.H. 2001. Evidence for Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities contributing to the sterility of hybrids between Mimulus guttatus and M. nasutus. Evolution 55: 1932-1942.
16. Gadella, T.W.J. 1964. Cytotaxonomic studies in the genus Campanula. Wentia 11: 1-104.
17. Galloway, L.F. 2001. The effect of maternal and paternal environments on seed characters in the herbaceous plant, Campanula americana (Campanulaceae). Am. J. Bot. 88: 832-840.
18. Galloway, L.F. & Fenster, C.B. 1999. The effect of nuclear and cytoplasmic genes on fitness and local adaptation in an annual legume. Evolution 53: 1734-1743.
19. Galloway, L.F. & Fenster, C.B. 2001. Nuclear and cytoplasmic contributions to intraspecific divergence in an annual legume. Evolution 55: 488-497.
20. Galloway, L.F., Etterson, J.R. & Hamrick, J.L. 2003. Outcrossing rates and inbreeding depression in the herbaceous autotetraploid Campanula americana. Heredity 90: 308-315.
21. Herrmann, R.G., Maier, R.M. & Schmitz-Linneweber, C. 2003. Eukaryotic genome evolution: rearrangement and coevolution of compartmentalized genetic information. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 358: 87-97.
22. Hufford, K.M. & Mazer, S.J. 2003. Plant ecotypes: genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 147-155.
23. Husband, B.C. & Schemske, D.W. 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50: 54-70.
24. Kalendar, R., Tanskanen, J., Immonen, S., Nevo, E. & Schulman, A.H. 2000. Genome evolution of wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum) by BARE-1 retrotransposon dynamics in response to sharp microclimatic divergence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97: 6603-6607.
25. Kalisz, S. & Wardle, G.M. 1994. Life history variation in Campanula americana (Campanulaceae): population differentiation. Am. J. Bot. 81: 521-527.
26. Kearns, C.A. & Inouye, D.W. 1993. Techniques for Pollination Biologists. University of Colorado Press, Niwot, Colorado.
27. Keller, M., Kollmann, J. & Edwards, P.J. 2000. Genetic introgression from distant provenances reduces fitness in local weed populations. J Appl. Ecol. 37: 647-659.
28. King, M. 1993. Species Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
29. Levin, D.A. 2000. The Origin, Expansion, and Demise of Plant Species. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
30. Levy, F. 1991. A genetic analysis of reproductive barriers in Phacelia dubia. Heredity 67: 331-345.
31. Luijten, S.H., Kery, M., Oostermeijer, J.G.B. & Den Nijs, H.J.C.M. 2002. Demographic consequences of inbreeding and outbreeding in Arnica montana: a field experiment. J. Ecol. 90: 593-603.
32. Lynch, M. 1991. The genetic interpretation of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression. Evolution 45: 622-629.
33. Lynch, M. & Force, A.G. 2000. The origin of interspecific genomic incompatibility via gene duplication. Am. Nat. 156: 590-605.
34. Lynch, M. & Walsh, B. 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer, Sunderland.
35. Macnair, M.R. & Christie, P. 1983. Reproductive isolation as a pleiotropic effect of copper tolerance in Mimulus guttatus? Heredity 50: 295-302.
36. Montalvo, A.M. & Ellstrand, N.C. 2001. Nonlocal transplantation and outbreeding depression in the subshrub Lotus scoparius (Fabaceae). Am. J. Bot. 88: 258-269.
37. Parker, M.A. 1992. Outbreeding depression in a selfing annual. Evolution 46: 837-841.
38. Quilichini, A., Debussche, M. & Thompson, J.D. 2001. Evidence for local outbreeding depression in the Mediterranean island endemic Anchusa crispa Viv. (Boraginaceae). Heredity 87: 190-197.
39. Rawson, P.D. & Burton, R.S. 2002. Functional coadaptation between cytochrome c and cytochrome c oxidase within allopatric populations of a marine copepod. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99: 12955-12958.
40. Rogers, J.L. 1965. Documented plant chromosome numbers 65:1. SIDA 2: 163-165.
41. SAS Institute. 2000. SAS/STAT, Version 8.0. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.
42. Schierup, M.H. & Christiansen, F.B. 1996. Inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression in plants. Heredity 77: 461-468.
43. Schmitt, J. & Gamble, S.E. 1990. The effect of distance from the parental site on offspring performance and inbreeding depression in Impatiens capensis: a test of the local adaptation hypothesis. Evolution 44: 2022-2030.
44. Soltis, D.E. & Soltis, P.S. 2003. Advances in the study of polyploidy since Plant Speciation. New Phytol. 161: 173-191.
45. Stacey, E.A. 2001. Cross-fertility in two tropical tree species: evidence of inbreeding depression within populations and genetic divergence among populations. Am. J. Bot. 88: 1041-1051.
46. Sugiura, T. 1942. Studies on the chromosome numbers in Campanulaceae. I. Campanuloideae - Campanuleae. Cytologia 12: 418-434.
47. Tiffin, P., Olson, M.S. & Moyle, L.C. 2001. Asymmetrical crossing barriers in angiosperms. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 861-867.
48. Turelli, M. & Orr, H.A. 2000. Dominance, epistasis and the genetics of post-zygotic isolation. Genetics 154: 1663-1679.
49. Waser, N.M., Price, M.V. & Shaw, R.G. 2000. Outbreeding depression varies among cohorts of Ipomopsis aggregata planted in nature. Evolution 54: 485-491.
50. Werth, C.R. & Windham, M.D. 1991. A model for divergent, allopatric speciation of polyploid pteridophytes resulting from silencing of duplicate-gene expression. Am. Nat. 137: 515-526.
51. Willett, C.S. & Burton, R.S. 2001. Viability of cytochrome C genotypes depends on cytoplasmic backgrounds in Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 55: 1592-1599.
52. Wright, S. 1943. Isolation by distance. Genetics 28: 114-138.