Plant ecotypes: Genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 147-155

  Hufford, Kristina M ^a   Mazer, Susan J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION GENETICS; ECOTYPE; FOUNDER EFFECT; GENOTYPE; LOCAL ADAPTATION; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; TRANSLOCATION;

EMBRYOPHYTA;

EID: 0037350858     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00002-8     Document Type: Review

References (68)

1. Turesson G. The species and the variety as ecological units. Hereditas. 3:1922;100-113.
2. Clausen J., et al. Experimental Studies on the Nature of Species. I. The Effect of Varied Environments on Western North American Plants. 1940;Carnegie Institute of Washington.
3. Linhart Y.B., Grant M.C. Evolutionary significance of local genetic differentiation in plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27:1996;237-277.
4. Hodder K.H., Bullock J.M. Translocations of native species in the UK: implications for biodiversity. J. Appl. Ecol. 34:1997;547-565.
5. Montalvo A.M., et al. Restoration biology: a population biology perspective. Restor. Ecol. 5:1997;277-290.
6. van Andel J. Intraspecific variability in the context of ecological restoration projects. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 1:1998;221-237.
7. Fenster C.B., Galloway L.F. Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in natural populations of Chamaecrista fasciculata (Fabaceae). Conserv. Biol. 14:2000;1406-1412.
8. Keller M., et al. Genetic introgression from distant provenances reduces fitness in local weed populations. J. Appl. Ecol. 37:2000;647-659.
9. Montalvo A.M., Ellstrand N.C. Transplantation of the subshrub Lotus scoparius: testing the home-site advantage hypothesis. Conserv. Biol. 14:2000;1034-1045.
10. Montalvo A.M., Ellstrand N.C. Nonlocal transplantation and outbreeding depression in the subshrub Lotus scoparius (Fabaceae). Am. J. Bot. 88:2001;258-269.
11. Barrett S.C.H., Kohn J.R. Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants: implications for conservation. Falk D.A., Holsinger K.E. Genetics and Conservation of Rare Plants. 1991;3-30 Oxford University Press.
12. Hedrick P.W. Genetics of Populations. 2nd edn:2000;Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
13. Williams S.L., Davis C.A. Population genetic analyses of transplanted eelgrass (Zostera marina) beds reveal reduced genetic diversity in Southern California. Restor. Ecol. 4:1996;163-180.
14. Williams S.L. Reduced genetic diversity in eelgrass transplantations affects both population growth and individual fitness. Ecol. Appl. 11:2001;1472-1488.
15. Robichaux R.H., et al. Molecular genetic consequences of a population bottleneck associated with the reintroduction of the Mauna Kea silversword (Argyroxiphium sandwicense spp. sandwicense [Asteraceae]). Conserv. Biol. 11:1997;1140-1146.
16. Friar E.A., et al. Microsatellite analysis of a population crash and bottleneck in the Mauna Kea silversword, Argyroxiphium sandwicense spp. sandwicense (Asteraceae), and its implications for restoration. Mol. Ecol. 9:2000;2027-2034.
17. Robichaux R., et al. Reintroudcing Hawaii's silverwoods. Endangered Species Bull. 25:2000;22-23.
18. Lenormand T. Gene flow and the limits to natural selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:2002;183-189.
19. Morrison S.L., Molofsky J. Environmental and genetic effects on the early survival and growth of the invasive grass Phalaris arundinacea. Can. J. Bot. 77:1999;1447-1453.
20. Saltonstall K. Cryptic invasion by a non-native genotype of the common reed, Phragmites australis, into North America. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:2002;2445-2449.
21. Grosholz E. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of coastal invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:2002;22-27.
22. Chambers R.M., et al. Expansion of Phragmites australis into tidal wetlands of North America. Aquat. Bot. 64:1999;261-273.
23. Levin D.A., et al. Hybridization and the extinction of rare plant species. Conserv. Biol. 10:1996;10-16.
24. Ellstrand N.C., et al. Gene flow and introgression from domesticated plants into their wild relatives. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30:1999;539-563.
25. Soltis P.S., Gitzendanner M.A. Molecular systematics and the conservation of rare species. Conserv. Biol. 13:1999;471-483.
26. Anttila C.K., et al. Reciprocal hybrid formation of Spartina in San Francisco Bay. Mol. Ecol. 9:2000;765-770.
27. Oostermeijer J.G.B., et al. Effects of outcrossing distance and selfing on fitness components in the rare Gentiana pneumonanthe. Acta Bot. Neerl. 44:1995;257-268.
28. Byers D.L. Effect of cross proximity on progeny fitness in a rare and a common species of Eupatorium (Asteraceae). Am. J. Bot. 85:1998;644-653.
29. Hauser T.P., Siegismund T.P. Inbreeding and outbreeding effects on pollen fitness and zygote survival in Silene nutans (Caryophyllaceae). J. Evol. Biol. 13:2000;446-454.
30. Fenster C.B., Galloway L.F. Population differentiation in an annual legume: genetic architecture. Evolution. 54:2000;1157-1172.
31. Sheridan P.M., Karowe D.N. Inbreeding, outbreeding and heterosis in the pitcher plant, Sarracenia flava (Sarraceniaceae), in Virginia. Am. J. Bot. 87:2000;1628-1633.
32. Luijten S.H., et al. Demographic consequences of inbreeding and outbreeding in Arnica montana: a field experiment. J. Ecol. 90:2002;593-603.
33. Lynch M. The genetic interpretation of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression. Evolution. 45:1991;622-629.
34. Templeton A.R. Coadaptation and outbreeding depression. Soulé M.E. Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity. 1986;105-116 Sinauer.
35. Wade M. Epistasis, complex traits, and mapping genes. Genetica. 112-113:2001;59-69.
36. Wade M. A gene's eye view of epistasis, selection and speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 15:2002;337-346.
37. Waser N.M., Price M.V. Crossing-distance effects in Delphinium nelsonii: outbreeding and inbreeding depression in progeny fitness. Evolution. 48:1994;842-852.
38. Waser N.M., et al. Outbreeding depression varies among cohorts of Ipomopsis aggregata planted in nature. Evolution. 54:2000;485-491.
39. Mazer S.M., LeBuhn G. Genetic variation in life-history traits: heritability estimates within and genetic differentiation among populations. Vuorisalo T.O., Mutikainen P.K. Life History Evolution in Plants. 1999;86-171 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
40. Dyer A.R., Rice K.J. Evidence of spatial genetic structure in a California bunchgrass population. Oecologia. 112:1997;333-339.
41. Gordon D.R., Rice K.J. Patterns of differentiation in wiregrass (Aristida beyrichiana): implications for restoration efforts. Restor. Ecol. 6:1998;166-174.
42. Knapp E.E., Rice K.J. Comparison of isozymes and quantitative traits for evaluating patterns of genetic variation in purple needlegrass (Nassella pulchra). Conserv. Biol. 12:1998;1031-1041.
43. Galloway L.F., Fenster C.B. Population differentiation in an annual legume: local adaptation. Evolution. 54:2000;1173-1181.
44. Keller M., Kollmann J. Bedeutung der Herkunft von Saatgut. Untersuchungen an Buntbrachen und anderen ökologischen Ausgleichsflächen. Naturschutz Landschaftsplanung. 30:1998;101-106.
45. Joshi J., et al. Local adaptation enhances performance of common plant species. Ecol. Lett. 4:2001;536-544.
46. Milligan B.G., et al. Conservation genetics: beyond the maintenance of marker diversity. Mol. Ecol. 3:1994;423-435.
47. Hedrick P.W. Conservation genetics: where are we now? Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:2001;629-636.
48. Petit C., et al. Gene flow and local adaptation in two endemic plant species. Biol. Conserv. 100:2001;21-34.
49. Vitalis R., et al. Interpretation of variation across marker loci as evidence of selection. Genetics. 158:2001;1811-1825.
50. Knapp E.E., Rice K.J. Genetic structure and gene flow in Elymus glaucus (blue wildrye): implications for native grassland restoration. Restor. Ecol. 4:1996;1-10.
51. Friar E.A., et al. Population structure in the endangered Mauna Loa silversword, Agryroxiphium kauense (Asteraceae), and its bearing on reintroduction. Mol. Ecol. 10:2001;1657-1663.
52. Knapp E.E., Connors P.G. Genetic consequences of a single-founder population bottleneck in Trifolium amoenum (Fabaceae). Am. J. Bot. 86:1999;124-130.
53. Daehler C.C., Strong D.R. Hybridization between introduced smooth cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora; Poaceae) and native California cordgrass (S. foliosa) in San Francisco Bay, California, USA. Am. J. Bot. 84:1997;607-611.
54. De Greef B., Triest L. The use of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) for hybrid detection in Scirpus from the river Schelde (Belgium). Mol. Ecol. 8:1999;379-386.
55. Allendorf F.W., et al. The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:2001;613-622.
56. Kitzmiller J.H. Managing genetic diversity in a tree improvement program. For. Ecol. Manage. 35:1990;131-149.
57. Millar C.I., Libby W.J. Disneyland or native ecosystem: genetics and the restorationist. Restor. Manage. Notes. 7:1989;18-24.
58. Knapp E.E., Rice K.J. Starting from seed: genetic issues in using native grasses for restoration. Restor. Manage. Notes. 12:1994;40-45.
59. Lesica P., Allendorf F.W. Ecological genetics and the restoration of plant communities: mix or match? Restor. Ecol. 7:1999;42-50.
60. Rice K.J., Knapp E.E. Evolutionary factors affecting the probability of local adaptation or should we expect to see ecotypes behind every rock? Keeley J.E., et al. 2nd Interface Between Ecology and Land Development in California. 2000;221-226. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 00-62.
61. Hamrick J.L., Godt M.J.W. Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 351:1996;1291-1298.
62. Roff D.A. Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics. 1998;Chapman & Hall.
63. Fenster C.B., Galloway L.F. Developmental homeostasis and floral form: evolutionary consequences and genetic basis. Int. J. Plant. Sci. 158:1997;S121-S130.
64. Lynch M., Walsh B. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. 1998;Sinauer.
65. Templeton A.R. Off-site breeding of animals and implications for plant conservation strategies. Falk D.A., Holsinger K.E. Genetics and Conservation of Rare Plants. 1991;182-194 Oxford University Press.
66. Reinartz J.A. Planting state-listed endangered and threatened plants. Conserv. Biol. 9:1995;771-781.
67. Burton P.J., Burton C.M. Promoting genetic diversity in the production of large quantities of native plant seed. Ecol. Restor. 20:2002;117-123.
68. Ryman N., et al. Supportive breeding and variance effective population size. Conserv. Biol. 9:1995;1619-1628.