Combining perimetric suprathreshold and threshold procedures to reduce measurement variability in areas of visual field loss

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 43-51

  McKendrick, Allison M ^a   Turpin, Andrew ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Algorithms; Computer simulation; Perimetry; Suprathreshold screening; Visual fields

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ERROR ANALYSIS; PATIENT MONITORING; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ESTIMATION MINIMIZING UNCERTAINTY (EMU); FULL THRESHOLD (FT); VISUAL FIELD PRESENTATIONS;

VISION;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; MEASUREMENT; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCOTOMA; SCREENING; VISION TEST; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PERIMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SCOTOMA; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 12444312975     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Spenceley SE, Henson DB. Visual field test simulation and error in threshold estimation. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:304-8.
2. Heijl A, Lindgren A, Lindgren G. Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields. Am J Ophthalmol 1989;108:130-5.
3. Johnson CA, Chauhan BC, Shapiro LR. Properties of staircase procedures for estimating thresholds in automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992;33:2966-74.
4. Wild JM, Pacey IE, O'Neill EC, Cunliffe IA. The SITA perimetric threshold algorithms in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40;1998-2009
5. Artes PH, Iwase A, Ohno Y, Kitazawa Y, Chauhan BC. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43: 2654-9.
6. Bengtsson B, Olsson J, Heijl A, Rootzen H. A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1997;75:368-75.
7. Olsson J, Bengtsson B, Heijl A, Rootzen H. An improved method to estimate frequency of false positive answers in computerized perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1997;75:181-3.
8. Wild JM, Pacey IE, Hancock SA, Cunliffe IA. Between-algorithm, between-individual differences in normal perimetric sensitivity: full threshold, FASTPAC, and SITA. Swedish Interactive Threshold algorithm. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40: 1152-61.
9. Chauhan BC, Tompkins JD, LeBlanc RP, McCormick TA. Characteristics of frequency-of-seeing curves in normal subjects, patients with suspected glaucoma, and patients with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34:3534-40.
10. Henson DB, Chaudry S, Artes PH, Faragher EB, Ansons A. Response variability in the visual field: comparison of optic neuritis, glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:417-21.
11. Turpin A, McKendrick AM, Johnson CA, Vingrys AJ. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from full threshold, ZEST, and SITA-like strategies, as determined by computer simulation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:4787-95.
12. Knuth DE. The Art of Computer Programming, 3rd ed. Vol 1: Fundamental Algorithms. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1997.
13. Anderson DR, Patella VM. Automated Static Perimetry, 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1999.
14. King-Smith PE, Grigsby SS, Vingrys AJ, Benes SC, Supowit A. Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation. Vision Res 1994;34:885-912.
15. Henson DB, Artes PH. New developments in supra-threshold perimetry. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2002;22:463-8.
16. Artes PH, Henson DB, Harper R, McLeod D. Multisampling suprathreshold perimetry: a comparison with conventional suprathreshold and full-threshold strategies by computer simulation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:2582-7.
17. Bengtsson B, Heijl A, Olsson J. Evaluation of a new threshold visual field strategy, SITA, in normal subjects. Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998;76:165-9.
18. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Evaluation of a new perimetric threshold strategy, SITA, in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998;76:268-72.
19. Turpin A, McKendrick AM, Johnson CA, Vingrys AJ. Development of efficient threshold strategies for frequency doubling technology perimetry using computer simulation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:322-31.
20. Vingrys AJ, Pianta MJ. A new look at threshold estimation algorithms for automated static perimetry. Optom Vis Sci 1999;76:588-95.