An improved method to estimate frequency of false positive answers in computerized perimetry

Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica

Volumn 75, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 181-183

  Olsson, Jonny ^a,d   Bengtsson, Boel ^b   Heijl, Anders ^b   Rootzén, Holger ^c  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^c CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^d BLEKINGE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Computerized perimetry; False positive answers; Reliability; Visual field testing

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED PERIMETRY; ERROR; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; TECHNIQUE; TIME; VISION TEST; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL THRESHOLD;

EID: 0030927853     PISSN: 13953907     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.1997.tb00120.x     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Greve EL (1973): Single and multiple stimulus static perimetry in glaucoma; the two phases of perimetry. In: Henkes (ed). Doc Ophthalmol 36. Dr Junk publishers, The Hague.
2. Haley MJ (1987): The field analyzer primer. Allergan Humphrey, San Leandro, California.
3. Heijl A, Lindgren G & Olsson J (1987a): Reliability parameters in computerized perimetry. In: Greve EL & Heijl A (eds). Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 49: 593-600. Dr Junk publishers, Dordrecht.
4. Heijl A, Lindgren G & Olsson J (1987b). A package for statistical analysis of computerized fields. In: Greve EL & Heijl A (eds). Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 49: 153-168. Dr Junk publishers, Dordrecht.
5. Katz J, Sommer A & Win K (1991a): Reliability of visual field results over repeated testing. Ophthalmology 98: 70-75.
6. Katz J, Sommer A, Gaasterland DE & Anderson DR (1991b): Comparison of analytic algorithms for detecting glaucomatous visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol 109: 1684-1689.
7. Lee M, Zulauf M & Caprioli J (1994): The influence of patient reliability on visual field outcome. Am J Ophtalmol 117: 756-761.
8. McMillan TA, Stewart WC & Hunt HH (1992): Association of reliability with reproducibility of the glaucomatous visual field. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 70: 665-670.
9. Olsson J & Rootzén H (1994): An image model for quantal response analysis in perimetry. Scan Journal of Statistics 21: 375-387.