Multisampling suprathreshold perimetry: A comparison with conventional suprathreshold and full-threshold strategies by computer simulation

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 44, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 2582-2587

  Artes, Paul H ^a   Henson, David B ^b   Harper, Robert ^b   McLeod, David ^b  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; VISUAL THRESHOLD;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; PERIMETRY; PROBABILITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SAMPLING STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0038823793     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.02-1036     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bebie H, Fankhauser F, Spahr J. Static perimetry: strategies. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1976;54:325-338.
2. Heijl A, Lindgren A, Lindgren G. Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;108:130-135.
3. Bengtsson B, Olsson J, Heijl A, Rootzen H. A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1997;75:368-375.
4. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. SITA Fast, a new rapid perimetric threshold test: description of methods and evaluation in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998;76:431-437.
5. Artes PH, Iwase A, Ohno Y, Kitazawa Y, Chauhan BC. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from full-threshold, SITA standard, and SITA fast strategies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:2654-2659.
6. Wild JM, Dengler HM, Searle AE, O'Neill EC, Crews SJ. The influence of the learning effect on automated perimetry in patients with suspected glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1989;67:537-545.
7. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J. The effect of perimetric experience in normal subjects. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107:81-86.
8. Werner EB, Krupin T, Adelson A, Feitl ME. Effect of patient experience on the results of automated perimetry in glaucoma suspect patients [see comments]. Ophthalmology. 1990;97:44-48.
9. Schimiti RB, Avelino RR, Kara-Jose N, Costa VP. Full-threshold versus Swedish interactive threshold algorithm (SITA) in normal individuals undergoing automated perimetry for the first time. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:2084-2092.
10. Katz J, Tielsch JM, Quigley HA, Javitt J, Witt K, Sommer A. Automated suprathreshold screening for glaucoma: the Baltimore Eye Survey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:3271-3277.
11. Sponsel WE, Ritch R, Stamper R, et al. Prevent Blindness America visual field screening study. The Prevent Blindness America Glaucoma Advisory Committee [see comments]. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;120:699-708.
12. Dielemans I, Vingerling JR, Wolfs RC, Hofman A, Grobbee DE, de Jong PT. The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in a population-based study in The Netherlands. The Rotterdam Study. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1851-1855.
13. Coffey M, Reidy A, Wormald R, Xian WX, Wright L, Courtney P. Prevalence of glaucoma in the west of Ireland. Br J Ophthalmol. 1993;77:17-21.
14. Tuck MW, Crick RP. Use of visual field tests in glaucoma detection by optometrists in England and Wales. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1994;14:227-231.
15. Thomas R, Bhat S, Muliyil JP, Parikh R, George R. Frequency doubling perimetry in glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2002;11:46-50.
16. Spry PG, Henson DB, Sparrow JM, North RV. Quantitative comparison of static perimetric strategies in early glaucoma: test-retest variability. J Glaucoma. 2000;9:247-253.
17. Henson DB, Chaudry S, Artes PH, Faragher EB, Ansons A. Response variability in the visual field: comparison of optic neuritis, glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:417-421.
18. Henson DB, Artes PH, Chaudry SJ, Chauhan BC. Suprathreshold perimetry: establishing the test intensity. In: Wall M, Wild J, eds. Perimetry Update 1998/1999. The Hague, The Netherlands: Kugler Publications; 1999:243-252.
19. Artes PH. Developments in Suprathreshold Petimetry. PhD thesis. Manchester, UK: University of Manchester, 2001.
20. Chauhan BC, House PH, McCormick TA, LeBlanc RP. Comparison of conventional and high-pass resolution perimetry in a prospective study of patients with glaucoma and healthy controls. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:24-33.
21. Faulkner A. Repeatability of Full Threshold and Suprathreshold Visual Field Test Results in Glaucoma. PhD thesis. Manchester, UK: University of Manchester, 2001.
22. Kerrigan-Baumrind LA, Quigley HA, Pease ME, Kerrigan DF, Mitchell RS. Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:741-748.
23. Henson DB, Artes PH, Chauhan BC. Diffuse loss of sensitivity in early glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:3147-3151.
24. Chauhan BC, LeBlanc RP, Shaw AM, Chan AB, McCormick TA. Repeatable diffuse visual field loss in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:532-538