New developments in supra-threshold perimetry

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 463-468

  Henson, David B ^a   Artes, Paul H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Glaucoma; Supra threshold perimetry; Threshold perimetry; Visual fields

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISION TEST; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL THRESHOLD; AGED; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; REACTION TIME;

AGED; ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PERIMETRY; REACTION TIME; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0036726716     PISSN: 02755408     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00055.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Artes, P. H., Henson, D. B. and Chaudry, S. J. (2002a) Pointwise pass/fail criteria in suprathreshold perimetry. In: Perimetry Update 2000/2001 (eds M. Wall & J. Mills) Kugler Publications, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp. 283-291.
2. Artes, P. H., McLeod, D. and Henson, D. B. (2002b) Response time as a discriminator between true- and false-positive responses in suprathreshold perimetry. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci. 43, 129-132.
3. Artes, P. H., Henson, D. B., Harper, R. and McLeod, D. (2001) Detection and quantification of visual field loss: a comparison of perimetric strategies by computer simulation. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci. (in press).
4. Bengtsson, B. and Heijl, A. (1998) SITA fast, a new rapid perimetric ythreshold test. Description of methods and evaluation in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol 76, 431-437.
5. Bengtsson, B., Olsson, J., Heijl, A. and Rootzen, H. (1997) A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA. Acta Ophthalmol 75, 368-375.
6. Henson, D. B. and Anderson, R. (1991) Threshold-related suprathreshold field testing. Which is the best technique of establishing the threshold? In: Perimetric Update 1990/1991 (eds R. P. Mills and A. Heijl), Kugler Publications, The Hague, pp. 367-372.
7. Henson, D. B., Artes, P. H., Chaudry, S. J. and Chauhan, B. C. (1999) Suprathreshold perimetry: establishing the test level. In: Perimetry Update 1998/1999 (eds M. Wall and J. Wild) Kugler Publications, Amsterdam, pp. 243-252.
8. Henson, D. B., Chaudry, S., Artes, P. H., Faragher, E. B. and Ansons, A. (2000) Response variability in the visual field: comparison of optic neuritis, glaucoma, ocular hypertension and normal eyes. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci. 41, 417-421.
9. Katz, J., Tielsch, J. M., Quigley, H. A., Javitt, J. and Witt, K., Sommer A. (1993) Automated suprathreshold screening for glaucoma- the Baltimore Eye Survey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 34, 3271-3277.
10. Klein, B. E. K., Klein, R., Sponsel, W. E., Franke, T., Cantor, L. B., Martone, J. and Menage MJ (1992) Prevalence of glaucoma- The Beaver-Dam eye Study. Ophthalmology 99, 1499-1504.
11. Marra, G. and Flammer, J. (1991) The learning and fatigue effect in automated perimetry. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp Ophthalmol 229, 501-504.
12. Olsson, J., Bengtsson, B., Heijl, A. and Rootzen, H. (1997) An improved method to estimate frequency of false positive answers in computerized perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 75, 181-183.
13. Sponsel, W. E., Ritch, R., Stamper, R., Higginbotham, E., Anderson, D. R., Wilson, M. R. and Zimmerman, T. J. (1995) Prevent Blindness America visual field screening Study. Am. J. Ophthalmol 120, 699-708.
14. Tuck, M. and Crick, R. (1998) The age distribution of primary open angle glaucoma. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 5, 173-183.
15. Wild, J. M., Denglar-Harles, M., Searle, A. E. T., O'Neill, E. C. and Crews, S. J. (1989) The influence of the learning effect on automated perimetry in patients with suspect glaucoma. Acta Ophthamol 67, 537-545.