Designing strategies and tools for teacher training: The role of critical details, Examples in optics

Science Education

Volumn 89, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 13-27

  Viennot, Laurence ^a   Chauvet, Fraņoise ^a   Colin, Philippe ^a   Rebmann, Gérard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 12344289724     PISSN: 00368326     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sce.20040     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Chauvet, F. (1994). Construction d'une compréhension de la couleur intégrant sciences, techniques et perception: Principes d'élaboration et évaluation d'une séquence d'enseignement. Unpublished thesis. Université Paris VII "Denis Diderot."
2. Chauvet, F. (1996a). Un instrument pour évaluer un état conceptuel: Exemple du concept de couleur. Didaskalia, 8/61-79.
3. Chauvet, F. (1996b). Teaching colour: Designing and evaluation of a sequence. European Journal of Teacher Education, 19(2), 119-134.
4. Chauvet, F. (2001). Constructing a teacher training session about a sequence on colour. LDSP, Université Paris VII [online]. Retrieved March 15, 2003, from http://www.ccr.jussieu.fr/ldsp/sttis_p5/index_uk.htm
5. Chauvet, F., Colin, P., & Viennot, L. (1999). Reading images in optics. Students' difficulties, teachers' views and practice. STTIS French National Report WP2. Université Paris VII "Denis Diderot."
6. Colin, P. (2001). Two models for a physical situation: The case of optics. Students' difficulties, teachers' viewpoints and guidelines for a "didactical structure." In H. Behrendt et al. (Eds.), Research in science education-past, present and future (pp. 241-246). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Selected Contributions of the Second International Meeting of ESERA in Kiel.
7. Colin, P., Chauvet, F., & Viennot, L. (2002). Reading images in optics: Students' difficulties, and teachers' views. International Journal of Science Education, 24(3), 313-332.
8. Colin, P., Hirn-Chaine, C., & Viennot, L. (2001). Constructing a teacher training session about light and vision. LDSP, Université Paris VII [online]. Retrieved March 15, 2003, from http://www.ccr.jussieu.fr/ldsp/ sttis_p5/index_uk.htm
9. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12.
10. Gil-Perez, D., & Pessoa de Carvalho, A. M. (1998). Physics teacher training: Analysis and proposals. In A. Tiberghien, E. Jossem, & J. Barojas (Eds.), Connecting research in physics education with teacher education [online]. Available at: http://www.physics.ohio-state.edu/∼jossem/ICPE/ BOOKS.html
11. Gunstone, R., & White, R. (2000). Goals, methods and achievements of research in science education. In R. Millar, J. Leach, & J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education (pp. 293-307). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
12. Him, C., & Viennot, L. (2000).Transformation of didactic intentions by teachers: The case of geometrical optics in grade 8 in France. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 357-384.
13. Him-Chaine, C. (1998). Transformations d'intentions didactiques par les enseignants: Le cas de 1'optique élémentaire en classe de Quatrième. Unpublished thesis, University of Paris 7 (Denis Diderot).
14. Kaminski, W. (1989). Conceptions des enfants et des autres sur la lumière. Bulletin de l'Union des Physiciens, 716, 973-991.
15. Kaminski, W. (1991). Optique élémentaire en classe de quatrième: Raisons et impact sur les mâtres d'une maquette d'enseignement, Thesis (L.D.P.E.S.), Université Paris VII (Denis Diderot).
16. Karplus, R. (1969). Introductory physics, a model approach. New York: W.A. Benjamin.
17. Lijnse, P. L. (1994). La recherche-développement: Une voie vers une "structure didactique" de la physique empiriquement fondée. Didaskalia, 3, 93-108.
18. Millar, R. (1989). Constructive criticisms. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 587-596.
19. Pintó, R. (2005). Introducing curriculum innovations in science: Identifying teachers' transformations and the design of related teacher education. Science Education, 89, 1-12.
20. Pintó, R., Ametler, J., Chauvet, F., Colin, P., Giberti, G., Monroy, G., Ogborn, J., Ormerod, F., Sassi, E., Stylianidou, F., Testa, I., & Viennot, L. (2000). Investigation on the difficulties in teaching and learning graphic representations and on their use in science classrooms. STTIS Report RW2 [online]. Retrieved March 15, 2003, from http://www.blues.uab.es/ ∼idmc42
21. Rebmann, G., & Chauvet, F. (2001). Teaching geometrical optics with computer simulation of ray diagrams. LDSP, University of Paris 7 (Denis Diderot) [online]. Retrieved March 15, 2003, from http://www.ccr.jussieu.fr/ Idsp/sttis_p5/index_uk.htm
22. Saltiel, E., & Kaminski, W. (1996). Un exemple d'évaluation des nouveaux programmes: Problèmes liés à l'évaluation elle-même et à la formation des maîtres. Bulletin de l'Union des Physiciens, 786, 1271-1287.
23. Viennot, L. (2001a). Anticipating teachers' reactions to innovative sequences: Examples in optics. In R. Pintó & S. Surinach (Eds.), Physics teacher education beyond 2000 (pp. 65-72). Paris: Elsevier.
24. Viennot, L. (2001b). Physics education research: Inseparable contents and methods-The part played by critical details. In M. Athee, O. Björkqvist, E. Pehkonen, & V. Vatanen (Eds.), Research on Mathematics and Science Education (pp. 89-100). Jyväskylä, Finland: Institute for Educational Research, University of Jyväskylä
25. Viennot, L. (2003a). Teaching physics. With the collaboration of U. Besson, F. Chauvet, P. Colin, C. Hirn-Chaine, W. Kaminski, & S. Rainson. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
26. Viennot, L. (2003b). Relating research in didactics and actual teaching practice: Impact and virtues of critical details. In D. Psillos, P. Kariotoglou, V. Tselfes, G. Bisdikian, G. Fassoulopous, E. Hatzikraniotis, & M. Kallery (Eds.), Science education research in the knowledge-based society (pp. 383-393). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
27. Viennot, L., & Chauvet, F. (1997). Two dimensions to analyse research-based teaching strategies. International Journal of Science Education, 19(10), 1159-1168.
28. Viennot, L., Chauvet, F., Giberti, G., Gomez, R., Horn, C., Monroy, G., Ogbom, J., Pintó R., Sassi, E., Stylianidou, F., & Testa, I. (1999). Investigation on teacher transformations when implementing teaching strategies, STTIS Report RW3 [online]. Retrieved March 15, 2003, from http://www.blues.uab. es/∼idmc42
29. Viennot, L., & Rainson, S. (1999). Design and evaluation of a research-based teaching sequence: The superposition of electrics fields. International Journal of Science Education, 21, Special issue: Conceptual Development in Science Education (1), 1-16.