Introducing curriculum innovations in science: Identifying teachers' transformations and the design of related teacher education

Science Education

Volumn 89, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 1-12

  Pintó, Roser ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 12344338757     PISSN: 00368326     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sce.20039     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Bell, B. (1998). Teacher development in science education. In B. J. Fraser & K. J. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 681 -693). London: Kluwer.
2. Bell, B., & Pearson, J. (1992). Better learning. International Journal of Science Education, 14 (3), 349-361.
3. Black, P., & Atkin, J. M. (Eds.). (1996). Changing the subject: Innovations in science, mathematics and technology education. London: Routledge.
4. Brickhouse, N., & Bodner, G. M. (1992). The beginning science teacher: Classroom narratives of convictions and constraints. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(5), 471-485.
5. Briscoe, C. (1991). The dynamic interactions among beliefs, role metaphors, and teaching practices: A case study of teacher change. Science Education, 75(2), 185-199.
6. Brown, S., & McIntyre, D. (1978). Factors influencing teachers' responses to curricular innovations. Research Intelligence, 4(1), 19-23.
7. Cochran, K. F., & Jones, L. L. (1998). The subject matter knowledge of preservice science teachers. In B. J. Fraser & K. J. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 707-718). London: Kluwer.
8. Cornett, J. W., Yeotis, C., & Terwilligher, L. (1990). Teacher personal practical theories and their influence upon teacher curricular and instructional actions: A case study of a secondary science teacher. Science Education, 74 (5), 527-529.
9. Couchouron, M., Viennot, L., & Courdille, J. M. (1996). Les habitudes des enseignants et les intentions didactiques des nouveaux programmes d'électricité en classe de quatrième. Didaskalia, 8, 81-96.
10. Crawley, F. E., & Salyer, B. A. (1995). Origin of life science. Teachers' beliefs underlying curriculum reform in Texas. Science Education, 79(6), 611-635.
11. Davis, K. (2003). Change is hard: What science teachers are telling us about reform and teacher learning of innovative practices. Science Education, 87(1), 3-20.
12. De Manuel, E., & Jimenez, M. R. (2000). Las concepciones sobre ácidos y bases de los opositores al cuerpo de profesores de secundaria. Alambique, 24, 66-76.
13. De Jong, O., Korthagen, F., & Wubbels, T. (1998). Research on science teacher education in Europe: Teacher thinking and conceptual change. In B. J. Fraser & K. J. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 745-758). London: Kluwer.
14. Désautels, J., & Larochelle, M. (1998). The epistemology of students: The "thingified" nature of scientific knowledge. In B. J. Fraser & K. J. Tobin (Eds.), International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 115-126). London: Kluwer.
15. Feldman, A. (2002). Multiple perspectives for the study of teaching: Knowledge, reason, understanding, and being. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 1032-1055.
16. Flores, F., López, A., Gallegos, L., & Barojas, J. (2000). Transforming science and learning concepts of physics teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 22(2), 197-208.
17. Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (1992). (Eds.). Teacher development and educational change. London: Falmer.
18. Furió, C., Azcona, R., & Guisasola, G. (1999). Dificultades conceptuales y epistemológicas del profesorado en la ensefianza de los conceptos de cantidad de sustancia y de mol. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 17(3), 359-376.
19. Geddis, A. N. (1991). Improving the quality of science classroom discourse on controversial issues. Science Education, 75(2), 169-183.
20. Greene, M. (1967). Existential encounters for teachers. New York: Random House.
21. Grimellini Tomasini, N., & Levrini, O. (2001). Images of physics and pre-service teacher education. In R. Pintó & S. Surinach (Eds.), Physics teacher education beyond 2000 (pp. 355-358). Paris: Elsevier.
22. Gunstone, R., & Mitchel, I. J. (1998). Metacognition and conceptual change. In J. J. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist view (pp. 134-163). San Diego: Educational Psychology Series, Academic Press.
23. Gunstone, R. F., & White, R. T. (1998). Teachers' attitudes about physics classroom practice. In A. Tiberghien, E. L. Jossem, & J. Barojas (Eds.), Connecting research in physics education with teacher education [online]. Retrieved April 22, 2002, from http://www.physics.ohio-state.edu/ ∼jossem/REF/57.pdf
24. Gutierrez, R., & Pintó, R. (2001a). Ontologies and physics teachers training. In R. Pintó & S. Surinach (Eds.), Physics teacher education beyond 2000 (pp. 185-188). Paris: Elsevier.
25. Gutierrez, R., & Pintó, R. (2001b). Marcos interpretatives de las tendencias transformadoras detectadas en los profesores al enfrentarse a materiales curriculares innovadores. In Actas del VI Congreso Intemacional sobre investigation en la Didáctica de las Ciencias "Retos de la enseñanza de las Ciencias en el siglo XXI" (Extra Vol. 2, pp. 105-106), Barcelona: Enseñanza de las Ciencias-ICE.
26. Hansen, D. (1999). Conceptions of teaching and their consequences. In M. Lang, J. Olson, H. Hansen, & W. Blinder (Eds.), Changing schools/changing practice: Perspectives on educational reform and teacher professionalism (pp. 91-97). Louvain: IPN and Garant.
27. Hewson, P., & Hewson, M. (1992). The status of students' conceptions. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg, & H. Niedderer (Eds.), Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies (pp. 59-73). Kiel, Germany: IPN.
28. Him-Chaine, C. (1998). Transformations d'intentions didactiques par les enseignants: Le cas de l'optique élémentaire en classe de Quatrième. Unpublished thesis, University of Paris 7 (Denis Diderot).
29. Hubermann, M., & Miles, M. (1984). Innovation up close: How school improvement works (p. 279). New York: Plenum.
30. Huibregtse, I., Korthagen, F. A. J., & Wubbels, T. (1994). Physics teachers' conceptions of learning, teaching and professional development. International Journal of Science Education, 16(5), 539-561.
31. Johnston, K. (1991). High school science teachers' conceptualisations of teaching and learning: Theory and practice. European Journal of Teacher Education, 14(1), 65-78.
32. Koulaidis, V., & Ogborn, J. (1995). Science teachers' philosophical assumptions: How well do we understand them? International Journal of Science Education, 17(3), 273-283.
33. Lang, M., Day, C., Bünder, W., Hansen, H., Kysilka, H. T., & Tamari, K. (1999). Teacher professional development in the context of curriculum reform. In M. Lang, J. Oison, H. Hansen, & W. Bunder (Eds.), Changing schools/changing practices. Perspectives on educational reform and teacher professionalism (pp. 121-131). Louvain: IPN and Garant.
34. Lederman, N. (1992). Students and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331-359.
35. MacDonald, B., & Rudduck, J. (1971). Curriculum research and development projects: Barriers to success. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 41(2), 148-154.
36. McIntyre, D., & Brown, S. (1979). Science teachers' implementation of two intended innovations. Scottish Educational Review, 11(1), 42-57.
37. Moje, E. B. (1995). Talking about science: An interpretation of the effects of teacher talk in a high school science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4), 349-371.
38. Ogborn, J. (2002). Ownership and transformation: Teachers using curriculum innovations. Physics Education, 37(2), 142-146.
39. Parker, J., & Heywood, D. (2000). Exploring the relationship between subject knowledge and pedagogic content in primary teachers' learning about forces. International Journal of Science Education, 14(1), 25-40.
40. Pintó, R., Gutierrez, R. Ametller, J., Andresen, O., Balzano, E., Boohan, R., Chauvet, F., Colin, P., Couso, D., Giberti, G., Him, C., Kolsto, S. D., Monroy, G., Ogborn, J., Quale, A., Rebmann, G., Sassi, E., Stylianidou, F., Testa, I., & Viennot, L. (2001). Teachers transformations trends when implementing innovations. STTIS Report RW4 [online]. Retrieved March 15, 2003, from http://www.blues.uab.es/∼idmc42
41. Pomeroy, D. (1993). Implications of teachers' beliefs about the nature of science: Comparison of the beliefs of scientists, secondary science teachers, and elementary teachers. Science Education, 77(3), 261-278.
42. Pro, A. de (1998). El análisis de las actividades de enseñanza como fundamento para los programas de formación de los profesores, Alambique, 15, 15-28.
43. Rolff, H. G. (1993). Change by self organization. Theoretical bases and practical references for a better school. Weinheim/Munich: Juventa.
44. Roth, W.-M., Lawless, D., & Tobin, K. (2000). Towards a praxeology of teaching. Canadian Journal of Education, 25, 1-15.
45. Sassi, E., Monroy, G., & Testa, I. (2001). Research-based teacher training about real-time approaches: Some guide-lines and materials. In D. Psillos, P. Kariotoglou, V. Tselfes, G. Bisdikian, G. Fassoulopous, E. Hatzikraniotis, & M. Kallery (Eds.), Proceedings of Third International ESERA Conference on Science Education Research in the Knowledge Based Society (pp. 156-158). Thessaloniki, Greece: Art of Text.
46. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
47. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
48. STTIS (1998). STTIS Report RW0 Outline and justification of research methodology: Work packages WP1, WP2 and WP3 [online]. Available at: http://www.blues.uab.es/∼idmc42
49. Tamir, P. (1992). High school biology teachers' images of subject matter: An exploratory study. American Biology Teacher, 54, 212-217.
50. Terhart, E. (1999). Developing a professional Culture. In M. Lang, J. Oison, H. Hansen, & W. Bunder (Eds.), Changing schools/changing practices: Perspectives on educational reform and teacher professionalism (pp. 27-39). Louvain: IPN and Garant.
51. Tobin, K., & McRobbie, C. (1996). Cultural myths as constraints to the enacted science curriculum. Science Education, 80, 223-241.
52. Tüllberg, A., Strömdahl, H., & Lybeck, L. (1994). Students' conceptions of 1 mol and educators' conceptions of how to teach "the mole." International Journal of Science Education, 16(1), 145-156.
53. van den Akker, J. (1998). The science curriculum: Between ideals and outcomes. In B. J. Fraser & K. J. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 421-447). London: Kluwer.
54. Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (1999). Teachers' knowledge of models and modeling in science. International Journal of Science Education, 21 (11), 1141-1153.
55. Vicentini, M. (1999). Thermodynamics, not just thermal physics. Acta Scienciarum, 21(4), 795-803.
56. Viennot, L., Chauvet, F., Colin, P., & Rebmann, G. (2005). Designing strategies and tools for teacher training: The role of critical details, examples in optics. Science Education, 89, 13-27.
57. Zuzovsky, R. (1994). Conceptualizing a teaching experience on the development of the idea of evolution: An epistemological approach to the education of science teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), 557-574.