Examining the presence of computer-assisted instruction in physical therapy education

Journal of Allied Health

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 255-266

  Erickson, Mia L ^a  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EVALUATION; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEARNING; NORMAL HUMAN; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; QUESTIONNAIRE; TECHNOLOGY; TIME; UNIVERSITY;

COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION, CONTINUING; EDUCATION, PROFESSIONAL; OWNERSHIP; PHYSICAL THERAPY (SPECIALTY); QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 12244280191     PISSN: 00907421     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Cohen PA, Dacanay LS. A meta-analysis of computer based instruction in nursing education. Comput Nurs 1994;12:89-97.
2. Clark RA, Raffin TA. Efficacy of computers in teaching arterial blood gas analysis. Acad Med 1992;67:365-366.
3. Halloran L. A comparison of two methods of teaching: Computer managed instruction and keypad questions versus traditional classroom lecture. Comput Nurs 1995;13:285-288.
4. Kinney P, Keskula DR, Perry J. The effect of a computer-assisted instructional program on physical therapy students. J Allied Health 1997;26:57-61.
5. Mulligan R, Wood GJ. A controlled evaluation of computer-assisted training simulations in geriatric dentistry. J Dent Educ 1993;57:16-24.
6. Rasheed KS, Cohen PA. An evaluation of computer based instruction versus printed study guides in a dental materials course. J Dent Hyg 1990;64:36-39.
7. Schmidt SM, Arndt MJ, Gaston S, Miller BJ. The effectiveness of computer managed instruction versus traditional classroom lecture on achievement outcomes. Comput Nurs 1991;9:159-163.
8. Napholz L, McCanse R. Interactive video instruction increases efficiency in cognitive learning in a baccalaureate nursing education program. Comput Nurs 1994;12:149-153.
9. Faux TL, Black-Hughes C. A comparison of using the Internet versus lectures to teach social work history. Res Soc Work Pract 2000;10:454-467.
10. Gilbert DA, Kolacz NG. Effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction and small group review in teaching clinical calculation. Comput Nurs 1993;11:72-77.
11. Miller JA. Enhancement of achievement and attitudes through individualized learning style presentations of two allied health courses. J Allied Health 1998;27:150-156.
12. Boling NC, Robinson DH. Individual study, interactive multimedia, or cooperative learning: Which activity best supplements lecture based distance education. J Educ Psychol 1999;91:169-174.
13. Plack MM. Computer-assisted instruction versus traditional instruction in teaching human gross anatomy. J Physical Ther Educ 2000;14:38-43.
14. Froman R, Hence C, Neafsey PJ. A comparative assessment of interactive videodisc instruction. Comput Nurs 1993;11:236-241.
15. Cohen ST. Computer-assisted instruction as a learning resource for applied anatomy and kinesiology in the occupational therapy curriculum. Am J Occup Ther 1995;49:821-827.
16. Brudenell I, Carpenter CS. Adult learning styles and attitudes towards computer-assisted instruction. J Nurs Educ 1990;29:79-83.
17. Carlson HL. Learning style and program design in interactive multimedia. Educ Technol Res Dev 1991;39:41-48.
18. Khine MS. The interaction of cognitive styles with varying levels of feedback in multimedia presentation. Int J Instr Multimedia 1996;23:229-237.
19. Yoon G. The effects of instructional control, cognitive style, and prior knowledge on learning of computer-assisted instruction. J Educ Technol Syst 1994;22:357-370.
20. McClelland B. Digital learning and teaching: Evaluation of developments for students in higher education. Eur J Eng Educ 2001;26:107-115.
21. Sponder B, Hilgenfeld R. Cognitive guidelines for teachers developing computer-assisted instruction. Computing Teacher 1994; 22:9-15.
22. Hardin PC, Reis J. Interactive multimedia software design: Concepts, process, and evaluation. Health Educ Behav 1997;24:35-53.
23. Hartley KW. Media overload in instructional web pages and impact on learning. Educ Media Int 1999;36:145-150.
24. Lee SH, Boling E. Screen design guidelines for motivation in interactive multimedia instruction: a survey and framework for designers. Educ Technol 1999;39:19-26.
25. Shellnut B, Knowlton A, Savage T. Applying the ARCS model to the design and development of computer based modules for manufacturing engineering courses. Educ Technol Res Dev 1999;47:100-110.
26. Bailey DH. Constructivism and multimedia: Theory and application, innovation and transformation. Int J Instr Media 1996; 23:161-166.
27. Burgess GW. The design of adult learning around multimedia delivery. J Interactive Instr Dev 1996; 9:3-9.
28. Lawless KA, Brown SW. Multimedia learning environments: Issues of learner control and navigation. Instr Sci 1997;25:117-131.
29. Sherry A. Evaluation of multimedia authoring instruction based in a behaviorist-cognitive-constructivist continuum. Int J Instr Media 1998;25:201-217.
30. Yang SC. Designing instructional applications using constructive hypermedia. Educ Technol 1996;36:45-50.
31. Koller CA, Frankenfield JJ. Twelve tips for developing educational multimedia in a community based teaching hospital. Med Teacher 2000;22:7-11.
32. American Physical Therapy Association. Directory of Accredited PT and PTA Programs. Available at: http://www.apta.org; accessed December 2, 2001.
33. McAuley RJ. Requiring students to have computers: Questions for consideration. Acad Med 1998;23:669-673.
34. Ely JE, Osheroff JA. Lifelong self-directed learning using a computer database of clinical questions. J Fam Pract 1997;45:382-389.
35. Griffin NL, Schumm RW. Instructing occupational therapy students in information retrieval. Am J Occup Ther 1992;46:158-161.
36. Mangrulker RS, Whelan CT, Williams BC. Teaching medical information retrieval skills to internal medicine residents at the terminal site. Acad Med 1999;74:573-574.
37. Chodorow S. Educators must take the electronic revolution seriously. Acad Med 1996;71:221-226.
38. Hoffman B, Ritchie D. Using multimedia to overcome the problems with problem based learning. Instr Sci 1997;25:97-115.
39. Chin SS, Hortin JA. Teachers' perceptions of instructional technology and staff development. J Educ Tech Syst 1993;22:83-98.
40. Friedman RB. Top ten reasons why the world wide web may fail to change medical education. Acad Med 1996;71:979-981.
41. Muma RD, Mayta MD. Developing CD-ROM applications for allied health science students at remote sites. J Allied Health 1998;27:233-237.
42. Piemme TE. Computer-assisted learning and evaluation in medicine. JAMA 1988;260:367-372.
43. Fennimore T. Educational software gets a failing grade. Bioscience 1997;47:720.
44. Boyle J. Ventilatory control (Ventrol) simulation for education. Am J Physiol 1991;261:S25-29.
45. Hooper J, O'Connor J, Cheesmar R. Learning clinical biochemistry using interactive clinical cases. Clin Chim Acta 1996;248:119-123.
46. Frear V, Hirschbuhl JJ. Does interactive multimedia promote achievement and higher level thinking skills for today's science students? Br J Educ Technol 1999;30:323-329.
47. Dowding TJ. Virtual reality: Is it real? Performance and Instruction 1994;33:20-23.
48. MacDonald L, Caverly DC. Techtalk: Technology and developmental math. J Dev Educ 1999;22:32-33.
49. Levin J. Multiplicity in learning and teaching: A framework for developing innovative online education. J Res Comput Educ 2000;32:256-270.
50. Washington N, Parnianpour M. Using CAI to accommodate a variety of learning styles in a biomechanics course. Biomed Sci Instr 1997;33:41-46.
51. Kaufman D, Lee S. Formative evaluation of a multimedia CAL program in an ophthalmology clerkship. Med Teacher 1993; 15:327-341.
52. McNaught C. Evaluation strategies for developing and using effective computer-facilitated learning environments in science and engineering. Eur J Eng Educ 1999;24:23-34.