Applying the ARCS model to the design and development of computer-based modules for manufacturing engineering courses

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 100-110

  Shellnut, Bonnie ^a   Knowlton, Allie ^b   Savage, Tim ^b  

^a Wayne State University   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033445159     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02299469     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Andrews, D.H., & Goodson, L.A. (1980). A comparative analysis of models of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 34(4), 2-16.
2. Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1996). The systematic design of instruction. (3rd ed.). New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
3. Edmonds, G., Branch, R., & Mukherjee, P. (1994). A conceptual framework for comparing instructional design models. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(4), 55-72.
4. Fleming, M.L. (1993). Displays and communication. In M.L. Fleming & W.H. Levie (Eds.), Instructional message design (2nd ed., pp. 233-259). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Education Technology Publications.
5. Gagné, R. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction. (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
6. Gagné, R.M., Briggs, L.J., & Wager, W. (1988). Principles of instructional design. (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
7. Hannafin, M.J., Hannafin, K.M., Hooper, S.R., Rieber, L.P., & Kini, A.S. (1996). Research on and research with emerging technologies. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 378-402). New York: Macmillan Library Reference USA.
8. Hannafin, R.D., & Sullivan, H. (1995). Learner control in full and lean CAI programs. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(1), 19-30.
9. Keller, J.M. (1979). Motivation and instructional design: A theoretical perspective, Journal of Instructional Development, 2(24), 26-34.
10. Keller, J.M. (1983). Development and use of the ARCS model of motivational design (Lecture). Enschede, Netherlands: Technische Hogeschool Twente.
11. Keller, J.M. (1987a). Development and use of the ARCS model of insturctional design. Journal of Instructional Development, 30(3), 2-10.
12. Keller, J.M. (1987b). Strategies for stimulating the motivation to learn. Performance and instruction, 26(8), 1-7.
13. Keller, J.M. (1987c). The systematic process of motivational design. Performance and Instruction, 26(9), 1-8.
14. Keller, J.M., & Kopp, T.W. (1987). An application of the ARCS model of motivational design. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional theories in action: Lessons illustrating selected theories and models (pp. 289-320). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbraum Associates.
15. Main, R.G. (1993). Integrating motivation into the instructional design process. Educational Technology, 33(12), 37-41.
16. Maudlin, M. (1996). The formative evaluation of computer-based multimedia programs. Educational Technology, 36(2), 36-40.
17. McCombs, B.L. (1986). The instructional systems development (ISD) model: A review of those factors critical to its successful implementation. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 34(2), 67-81.
18. Means, T.B., Jonassen, D.H., & Dwyer, F.M. (1997). Enhancing relevance: Embedded ARCS strategies vs. purpose. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 5-17.
19. National Science Foundation Executive Summary (1993). In B. Shellnut, (Ed.), Greenfield Coalition design and development process handbook for knowledge area and computer-based instruction (pp. 1-9). Detroit, MI.
20. Northrup, P.T. (1995). Concurrent formative evaluation: guidelines and implications for multimedia designers. Educational Technology, 35(6), 24-31.
21. Okey, J.R., & Santiago, R.S. (1991). Integrating instructional and motivational design. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 4(2), 11-21.
22. Park, I., & Hannifin, M. (1993). Empirically-based guidelines for the design of interactive multimedia. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(3), 63-85.
23. Richey, R. (1997). Research on instructional development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(3), 91-100.
24. Rothwell, W.J., & Kazanas, H.C. (1992). Assessing relevant characteristics of learners. In L. Nadler & Z. Nadler (Eds.), Mastering the instructional design process: A systematic approach. College Park, MD: Josey-Bass, Inc.
25. Seels, B.B., & Richey, R.C. (1994). Instructional technology: The definition and domains of the field. Washington, D.C.: Association of Educational Communications and Technology.