Individual differences in locomotor reactivity to a novel environment and sensitivity to opioid drugs in the rat. II. Agonist-induced antinociception and antagonist-induced suppression of fluid consumption

Psychopharmacology

Volumn 177, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 68-78

  White, David A ^a   Kalinichev, Mikhail ^b   Holtzman, Stephen G ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b GLAXOSMITHKLINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Antinociception; Drinking; Hot plate; Locomotion; Milk; Opioids; Tail flick; Water

Indexed keywords

BUPRENORPHINE; ETORPHINE; MORPHINE; NALTREXONE; OPIATE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANTINOCICEPTION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; ENVIRONMENT; FLUID INTAKE; LOCOMOTION; MALE; MILK; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; REWARD; TAIL FLICK TEST;

ANALGESICS, OPIOID; ANIMALS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; DRINKING; ENVIRONMENT; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PAIN MEASUREMENT; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY;

EID: 12144281617     PISSN: 00333158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-004-1921-8     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Adams JU, Paronis CA, Holtzman SG (1990) Assessment of relative intrinsic activity of mu-opioid analgesics in vivo by using beta-funaltrexamine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 255:1027-1032
2. Agmo A, Galvan A, Talamantes B (1995) Reward and reinforcement produced by drinking sucrose: two processes that may depend on different neurotransmitters. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 52:403-414
3. Bardo MT, Donohew RL, Harrington NG (1996) Psychobiology of novelty seeking and drug seeking behavior. Behav Brain Res 77:23-43
4. Bevins RA, Klebaur JE, Bardo MT (1997) Individual differences in response to novelty, amphetamine-induced activity and drug discrimination in rats. Behav Pharmacol 8:113-123
5. Brennan K, Roberts DC, Anisman H, Merali Z (2001) Individual differences in sucrose consumption in the rat: motivational and neurochemical correlates of hedonia. Psychopharmacology 157:269-276
6. Brown DR, Holtzman SG (1979) Suppression of deprivation-induced food and water intake in rats and mice by naloxone. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 11:567-573
7. Conway CM, Martinez J, Lytle LD (1998) Maturational changes in the thermal nociceptive responses of developing rats. Dev Psychobiol 33:47-60
8. Cook CD, Barrett AC, Roach EL, Bowman JR, Picker MJ (2000) Sex-related differences in the antinociceptive effects of opioids: importance of rat genotype, nociceptive stimulus intensity, and efficacy at the mu opioid receptor. Psychopharmacology 150:430-442
9. D'Amour FE, Smith DL (1941) A method of determining loss of pain sensation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 72:74-79
10. Dellu F, Piazza PV, Mayo W, Le Moal M, Simon H (1996) Novelty-seeking in rats-biobehavioral characteristics and possible relationship with the sensation-seeking trait in man. Neuropsychobiology 34:136-145
11. Deroche V, Piazza PV, Le Moal M, Simon H (1993) Individual differences in the psychomotor effects of morphine are predicted by reactivity to novelty and influenced by corticosterone secretion. Brain Res 623:341-344
12. Dewey WL, Harris LS (1975) The tail flick test. Methods in narcotic research. Dekker, New York, pp 101-109
13. Emmerson PJ, Clark MJ, Mansour A, Akil H, Woods JH, Medzihradsky F (1996) Characterization of opioid agonist efficacy in a C6 glioma cell line expressing the mu opioid receptor. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 278:1121-1127
14. Erb SM, Parker LA (1994) Individual differences in novelty-induced activity do not predict strength of amphetamine-induced place conditioning. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 48:581-586
15. Gellert VF, Holtzman SG (1978) Development and maintenance of morphine tolerance and dependence in the rat by scheduled access to morphine drinking solutions. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 205:536-546
16. Gong W, Neill DB, Justice JB (1996) Locomotor response to novelty does not predict cocaine place preference conditioning in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 53:191-196
17. Grossman ML, Basbaum AI, Fields HL (1982) Afferent and efferent connections of the rat tail flick reflex (a model used to analyze pain control mechanisms). J Comp Neurol 206:9-16
18. Holtzman SG (1974) Behavioral effects of separate and combined administration of naloxone and D-amphetamine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 189:51-60
19. Holtzman SG (1979) Suppression of appetitive behavior in the rat by naloxone: lack of effect of prior morphine dependence. Life Sci 24:219-226
20. Hooks MS, Jones GH, Smith AD, Neill DB, Justice JB Jr (1991a) Individual differences in locomotor activity and sensitization. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 38:467-470
21. Hooks MS, Jones GH, Smith AD, Neill DB, Justice JB Jr (1991b) Response to novelty predicts the locomotor and nucleus accumbens dopamine response to cocaine. Synapse 9:121-128
22. Hooks MS, Colvin AC, Juncos JL, Justice JB Jr (1992a) Individual differences in basal and cocaine-stimulated extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens using quantitative microdialysis. Brain Res 587:306-312
23. Hooks MS, Jones GH, Liem BJ, Justice JB Jr (1992b) Sensitization and individual differences to IP amphetamine, cocaine, or caffeine following repeated intracranial amphetamine infusions. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 43:815-823
24. Hoshaw BA, Lewis MJ (2001) Behavioral sensitization to ethanol in rats: evidence from the Sprague-Dawley strain. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 68:685-690
25. Jodogne C, Marinelli M, Le Moal M, Piazza PV (1994) Animals predisposed to develop amphetamine self-administration show higher susceptibility to develop contextual conditioning of both amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion and sensitization. Brain Res 657:236-244
26. Kalinichev M, Easterling KW, Holtzman SG (2000) Periodic postpartum separation from the offspring results in long-lasting changes in anxiety-related behaviors and sensitivity to morphine in Long-Evans mother rats. Psychopharmacology 152:431-439
27. Kalinichev M, White DA, Holtzman SG (2004) Individualdifferences in locomotor reactivity to a novel environment and sensitivity toopioid drugs in the rat I. Morphine-induced locomotor sensitization andtolerance. Psychopharmacology (in press)
28. Klebaur JE, Bardo MT (1999) Individual differences in novelty seeking on the playground maze predict amphetamine conditioned place preference. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 63:131-136
29. Kosten TA, Miserendino MJ (1998) Dissociation of novelty- and cocaine-conditioned locomotor activity from cocaine place conditioning. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 60:785-791
30. Levine AS, Billington CJ (1989) Opioids. Are they regulators of feeding? Ann NY Acad Sci 575:209-219
31. Locke KW, Brown DR, Holtzman SG (1982) Effects of opiate antagonists and putative mu- and kappa-agonists on milk intake in rat and squirrel monkey. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 17:1275-1279
32. Mantsch JR, Ho A, Schlussman SD, Kreek MJ (2001) Predictable individual differences in the initiation of cocaine self-administration by rats under extended-access conditions are dose-dependent. Psychopharmacology 157:31-39
33. Morley JE, Levine AS, Yim GK, Lowy MT (1983) Opioid modulation of appetite. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 7:281-305
34. O'Callaghan JP, Holtzman SG (1975) Quantification of the analgesic activity of narcotic antagonists by a modified hot-plate procedure. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 192:497-505
35. Paolone G, Burdino R, Badiani A (2003) Dissociation in the modulatory effects of environmental novelty on the locomotor, analgesic, and eating response to acute and repeated morphine in the rat. Psychopharmacology 166:146-155
36. Paronis CA, Holtzman SG (1991) Increased analgesic potency of mu agonists after continuous naloxone infusion in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 259:582-589
37. Piazza PV, Deminiere JM, Le Moal M, Simon H (1989) Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Science 245:1511-1513
38. Piazza PV, Rouge-Pont F, Deminiere JM, Kharoubi M, Le Moal M, Simon H (1991) Dopaminergic activity is reduced in the prefrontal cortex and increased in the nucleus accumbens of rats predisposed to develop amphetamine self-administration. Brain Res 567:169-174
39. Piazza PV, Deroche V, Deminiere JM, Maccari S, Le Moal M, Simon H (1993) Corticosterone in the range of stress-induced levels possesses reinforcing properties: implications for sensation-seeking behaviors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90:11738-11742
40. Robinet PM, Rowlett J, Bardo MT (1998) Individual differences innovelty-induced activity and the rewarding effects of novelty and amphetaminein rats. Behav Process 44:1-9
41. Rouge-Pont F, Piazza PV, Kharouby M, Le Moal M, Simon H (1993) Higher and longer stress-induced increase in dopamine concentrations in the nucleus accumbens of animals predisposed to amphetamine self-administration. A microdialysis study. Brain Res 602:169-174
42. Selley DE, Liu Q, Childers SR (1998) Signal transduction correlates of mu opioid agonist intrinsic efficacy: receptor-stimulated [35S]GTP gamma S binding in mMOR-CHO cells and rat thalamus. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 285:496-505
43. Smith MA, Gray JD (2001) Age-related differences in sensitivity to the antinociceptive effects of opioids in male rats. Influence of nociceptive intensity and intrinsic efficacy at the mu receptor. Psychopharmacology 156:445-453
44. Vitale MA, Chen D, Kanarek RB (2003) Chronic access to a sucrose solution enhances the development of conditioned place preferences for fentanyl and amphetamine in male Long-Evans rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 74:529-539
45. Way EL, Loh HH, Shen FH (1969) Simultaneous quantitative assessment of morphine tolerance and physical dependence. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 167:1-8
46. Willner P (1984) The validity of animal models of depression. Psychopharmacology 83:1-16
47. Yaksh TL (1981) Spinal opiate analgesia: characteristics and principles of action. Pain 11:293-346