Individual differences in response to novelty, amphetamine-induced activity and drug discrimination in rats

Behavioural Pharmacology

Volumn 8, Issue 2-3, 1997, Pages 113-123

  Bevins, R A ^a   Klebaur, J E ^b   Bardo, M T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

Activity; D Amphetamine; Dopamine; Operant conditioning; Place preference; Rat

Indexed keywords

DEXAMPHETAMINE; DOPAMINE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG DISCRIMINATION; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; INDIVIDUALITY; INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING; INTRAPERITONEAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; LOCOMOTION; MALE; NONHUMAN; PLACE PREFERENCE; RAT; REWARD; SCREENING; STIMULUS GENERALIZATION; STRESS;

ANIMALS; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM STIMULANTS; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; DEXTROAMPHETAMINE; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; ENVIRONMENT; GENERALIZATION, RESPONSE; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; STIMULATION, CHEMICAL;

EID: 0030831262     PISSN: 09558810     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour, 49, 227-267.
2. Antelman SM, Eichler AJ, Black CA and Kocan D (1980) Interchangeabilite of stress and amphetamine in sensitization. Science, 207, 329-331.
3. Bardo MT, Neisewander JL and Pierce RC (1989) Novelty-induced place preference behavior in rats: effects of opiate and dopaminergic drugs. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 32, 683-689.
4. Bardo MT, Donohew RL and Harrington NG (1996) Psychobiology of novelty seeking and drug seeking behavior. Behavioural Brain Research, 77, 23-43.
5. Burns LH, Annett L, Kelley AE, Everitt BJ and Robbins TW (1996) Effects of lesions to amygdala, ventral subiculum, medial prefrontal cortex, and nucleus accumbens on the reaction to novelty: Implications for limbic-striatal interactions. Behavioral Neuroscience, 110, 60-73.
6. Colpaert FC (1987) Drug discrimination: Methods of manipulation, measurement, and analysis. In: Methods of Assessing the Reinforcing Properties of Abused Drugs (Ed MA Bozarth), pp. 341-372. Springer-Verlag, New York.
7. deWit H, Uhlenhuth EH and Johanson CE (1986) Individual differences in the reinforcing and subjective effects of amphetamine and diazepam. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 16, 341-360.
8. Erb SM and Parker LA (1994) Individual differences in novelty-induced activity do not predict strength of amphetamine-induced place conditioning. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 48, 581-586.
9. Exner M and Clark D (1993) Behaviour in the novel environment predicts responsiveness to d-amphetamine in the rat: a multivariate approach. Behavioural Pharmacology, 4, 47-56.
10. Gaito J and Nobrega JN (1981) A note on multiple comparisons as an ANOVA problem. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 17, 169-170.
11. Gallagher M and Holland PC (1994) The amygdala complex: multiple roles in associative learning and attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 91, 11771-11776.
12. Gingras MA and Cools AR (1995) Differential ethanol intake in high and low responders to novelty. Behavioural Pharmacology, 6, 718-723.
13. Gong W, Neill DB and Justice JB (1996) Locomotor response to novelty does not predict cocaine place preference conditioning in rats. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 53, 191-196.
14. Haude RH and Ray OS (1967) Visual exploration in monkeys as a function of visual incentive duration and sensory deprivation. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 64, 332-336.
15. B receptor mechanisms to individual differences in amphetamine-induced locomotion. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 48, 1019-1024.
16. Hooks MS and Kalivas PW (1994) Involvement of dopamine and excitatory amino acid transmission in novelty-induced motor activity. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 269, 976-988.
17. Hooks MS, Jones GH, Liem BJ and Justice JB (1992) Sensitization and individual differences to IP amphetamine, cocaine, or caffeine following repeated intracranial amphetamine infusions. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 43, 815-823.
18. 2 receptors and mRNAs. The Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 6144-6152.
19. Hooks MS, Sorg BA and Kalivas PW (1994b) The relationship between mRNA levels and the locomotor response to novelty. Brain Research, 663, 312-316.
20. Jodogne C, Marinelli M, LeMoal M and Piazza PV (1994) Animals predisposed to develop amphetamine self-administration show higher susceptibility to develop contextual conditioning of both amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion and sensitization. Brain Research, 657, 236-244.
21. Jones CN, Grant LD and Vospalek DM (1976) Temporal parameters of d-amphetamine as a discriminative stimulus in the rat. Psychopharmacologia, 46, 59-64.
22. Kalivas PW and Stewart J (1991). Dopamine transmission in the initiation and expression of drug- and stress-induced sensitization of motor activity. Brain Research Reviews, 16, 223-244.
23. Kamien JB, Bickel WK, Hughes JR, Higgins ST and Smith BJ (1993) Drug discrimination by humans compared to non-humans: current status and future directions. Psychopharmacology, 111, 259-270.
24. Kosten TA, Ball SA and Rounsaville BJ (1994) A sibling study of sensation seeking and opiate addiction. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 182, 284-289.
25. Kuhn DM, Appel JB and Greenberg I (1974) An analysis of some discriminative properties of d-amphetamine. Psychopharmacologia, 39, 57-66.
26. Lubow RE (1973) Latent inhibition. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 398-407.
27. May RB and Beauchamp KL (1969) Stimulus change, previous experience and extinction. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 68, 607-610.
28. Miles RC (1958) Learning in kittens with manipulatory, exploratory, and food incentives. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 51, 39-42.
29. Overton DA (1979) Influence of shaping procedures and schedules of reinforcement on performance in the two-bar drug discrimination task: a methodological report. Psychopharmacology, 65, 291-298.
30. Overton DA (1987) Applications and limitations of the drug discrimination method for the study of drug abuse. In: Methods of Assessing the Reinforcing Properties of Abused Drugs (Ed MA Bozarth), pp. 291-340. Springer-Verlag, New York.
31. Peltier RL, Li DH, Lytle D, Taylor CM and Emmett-Oglesby (1996) Chronic d-amphetamine or methamphetamine produces cross-tolerance to the discriminative and reinforcing stimulus effects of cocaine. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 277, 212-218.
32. Piazza PV, Deminière J-M, LeMoal M and Simon H (1989) Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Science, 245, 1511-1513.
33. Piazza PV, Deminière J-M, Le Moal M and Simon H (1990) Stress- and pharmacologically induced behavioral sensitization increases vulnerability to acquisition of amphetamine self-administration. Brain Research, 514, 22-26.
34. Pierce RC, Crawford CA, Nonneman AJ, Mattingly BA and Bardo MT (1990) Effect of forebrain dopamine depletion on novelty-induced place preference behavior in rats. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 36, 321-325.
35. Preston KL, Bigelow GE, Bickel WK and Liebson IA (1987) Three choice drug discrimination in opioid-dependent humans: hydromorphone, naltrexone and saline. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 243, 1002-1009.
36. Sandi C, Borrell J and Guaza C (1992) Behavioral factors in stress-induced immunomodulation. Behavioural Brain Research, 48, 95-98.
37. Segal DS and Kuczenski R (1987) Individual differences in responsiveness to single and repeated amphetamine administration: behavioral characteristics and neurochemical correlates. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 242, 917-926.
38. Wills TA, Vaccaro D and McNamara G (1994) Novelty seeking, risk taking, and related constructs as predictors of adolescent substance abuse: an application of Cloninger's theory. Journal of Substance Abuse, 6, 1-20.
39. Yanagita T (1987) Prediction of drug abuse liability from animal studies. In: Methods of Assessing the Reinforcing Properties of Abused Drugs (Ed MA Bozarth). pp. 189-198. Springer-Verlag, New York.
40. Zuckerman M (1984) Sensation seeking: a comparative approach to a human trait. Behavioral and Brain Science, 7, 413-471.