Dissociation of novelty- and cocaine-conditioned locomotor activity from cocaine place conditioning

Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 785-791

  Kosten, Therese A ^a   Miserendino, Mindy J D ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cocaine; Conditioned place preference; Context conditioning; Habituation; Individual differences; Locomotor sensitization; Novelty response; Outbred rats; Reward

Indexed keywords

COCAINE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; INTRAPERITONEAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; LOCOMOTION; MALE; NONHUMAN; PLACE PREFERENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT;

ANIMALS; COCAINE; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; DOPAMINE UPTAKE INHIBITORS; ENVIRONMENT; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0031854867     PISSN: 00913057     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0091-3057(97)00388-2     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ahmed S.H., Oberling P., Di Scala G., Sandner G. Amphetamine-induced conditioned activity does not result from a failure of rats to habituate to novelty. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 123:1996;325-332.
2. Bardo M.T., Neisewander J.L., Pierce R.C. Novelty-induced place preference behavior in rats. Effects of opiate and dopaminergic drugs Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 32:1990;683-687.
3. Berlyne D.E. The arousal and satiation of perceptual curiosity in the rat. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 48:1955;238-246.
4. Calcagnetti D.J., Schechter M.D. Extinction of cocaine-induced place approach in rats. A validation of the "biased" conditioning procedure Brain Res. Bull. 30:1993;695-700.
5. Carr G.D., Phillips A.G., Fibiger H.C. Conditioned place preferences as a measure of drug reward. Liebman J.M., Cooper S.J. The neuropharmacological basis of reward. 1989;264-319 Oxford, New York.
6. Cools A.R., Brachten R., Heeren D., Willemen A., Ellenbroek B. Search after neurobiological profile of individual-specific features of wistar rats. Brain Res. Bull. 24:1990;19-69.
7. Cunningham C.L., Noble D. Conditioned activation induced by ethanol. Role in sensitization and conditioned place preference Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 43:1992;307-313.
8. Deroche V., Piazza P.V., Le Moal M., Simon H. Individual differences in the psychomotor effects of morphine are predicted by reactivity to novelty and influenced by corticosterone secretion. Brain Res. 623:1993;341-344.
9. Erb S.M., Parker L.A. Individual differences in novelty-induced activity do not predict strength of amphetamine-induced place conditioning. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 48:1994;581-586.
10. Exner M., Clark D. Behaviour in the novel environment predicts responsiveness to d-amphetamine in the rat. A multivariate approach Behav. Pharmacol. 4:1993;47-56.
11. Gold L.H., Swerdlow N.R., Koob G.F. The role of the mesolimbic dopamine system in conditioned locomotion produced by amphetamine. Behav. Neurosci. 102:1988;544-553.
12. Gong W., Neill D.B., Justice J.B. Jr. Locomotor response to novelty does not predict cocaine place preference conditioning in rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 53:1996;191-196.
13. Hooks M.S., Jones G.H., Smith A.D., Neill D.B., Justice J.B. Jr. Individual differences in locomotor activity and sensitization. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 38:1991;467-470.
14. Hooks M.S., Jones G.H., Neill D.B., Justice J.B. Jr. Individual differences in amphetamine sensitization. Dose-dependent effects Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 41:1991;203-210.
15. Hooks M.S., Colvin A.C., Juncos J.L., Justice J.B. Jr. Individual differences in basal and cocaine stimulated extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens using quantitative microdialysis. Brain Res. 587:1992;306-312.
16. Hooks M.S., Jones G.H., Juncos J.L., Neill D.B., Justice J.B. Jr. Individual differences in schedule-induced and conditioned behaviors. Behav. Brain Res. 60:1994;199-209.
17. 2 receptors and mRNAs. J. Neurosci. 14:1994;6144-6152.
18. Jodogne C., Marinelli M., Le Moal M., Piazza P.V. Animals predisposed to develop amphetamine self-administration show higher susceptibility to develop contextual conditioning of both amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion and sensitization. Brain Res. 657:1994;236-244.
19. Kalivas P.W., Stewart J. Dopamine transmission in the initiation and expression of drug- and stress-induced sensitization of motor activity. Brain Res. Rev. 16:1991;223-244.
20. Kosten T.A., Miserendino M.J.D., Chi S., Nestler E.J. Fischer and Lewis rats strains show differential cocaine effects in conditioned taste aversion. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 269:1994;137-144.
21. Miserendino M.J.D., Guitart X., Terwilliger R.Z., Chi S., Neslter E.J. Individual differences in locomotor activity are associated with levels of tyrosine hydroxylase and neurofilament proteins in the ventral tegmental area of Sprague-Dawley rats. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 4:1993;440-448.
22. Parker L.A. Place conditioning in a three- or four-choice apparatus. role of stimulus novelty in drug-induced place conditioning Behav. Neurosci. 106:1992;294-306.
23. Piazza P.V., Deminiere J.M., Le Moal M., Simon H. Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Science. 29:1989;1511-1513.
24. Piazza P.V., Deminiere J.M., Maccari S., Mormede P. Individual reactivity to novelty predicts probability of amphetamine self-administration. Behav. Pharmacol. 1:1990;339-345.
25. Piazza P.V., Rouge-Pont F., Deminiere J.M., Kharoubi M., Le Moal M., Simon H. Dopaminergic activity is reduced in the prefrontal cortex and increased in the nucleus accumbens of rats predisposed to develop amphetamine self-administration. Brain Res. 567:1991;169-174.
26. Post R.M., Weiss S.R.B., Pert A. The role of context and conditioning in behavioral sensitization to cocaine. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 23:1987;425-429.
27. Reid L.D., Marglin S.H., Mattie M.E., Hubbell C.L. Measuring morphine's capacity to establish a place preference. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 33:1989;765-775.
28. Robinson T.E., Becker J.B. Enduring changes in brain and behavior produced by chronic amphetamine administration. A review and evaluation of animal models of amphetamine psychosis Brain Res. Rev. 11:1986;157-198.
29. Rowlett J.K., Gibson T.R., Bardo M.T. Dissociation of buprenorphine-induced locomotor sensitization and conditioned place preference in rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 49:1994;241-245.
30. Scoles M.T., Siegel S. A potential role of saline trials in morphine-induced place preference conditioning. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 25:1986;1169-1173.
31. Stewart J., Vezina P. Conditioning and behavioral sensitization. Kalivas P.W., Barnes C.D. Sensitization in the nervous system. 1988;207-224 The Telford Press, Caldwell.
32. Swerdlow N.R., Koob G.F. Restrained rats learn amphetamine-conditioned locomotion, but not place preference. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 84:1984;163-166.
33. Vezina P., Stewart J. Morphine conditioned place preference and locomotion. The effect of confinement during training Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 93:1987;257-269.
34. Wise R.A., Bozarth M.A. A psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction. Psychol. Rev. 94:1987;469-492.