The battering of informed consent

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 565-569

  Kottow, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CULTURAL FACTOR; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EMERGENCY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INDEPENDENCE; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATERNALISM; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT CARE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; RESEARCH ETHICS;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;

BIOETHICAL ISSUES; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; PATIENT RIGHTS;

EID: 11144328940     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2003.002949     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Sass HM. Rundschreiben 1931: Pre-Nuremberg German regulations concerning new therapy and human experimentation. J Med Philos 1983;8:99-112.
2. Kirby MD. Informed consent: what does it mean? J Med Ethics 1983;9:69-75.
3. Sen A. Inequality re-examined. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1995.
4. Strong C. Informed consent: theory and policy. J Med Ethics 1979;5:196-9.
5. Brody H. Ethical decisions in medicine. Boston: Little, Brown and Co, 1976:51.
6. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics [2nd ed]. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983:66.
7. Engelhardt Jr HT. The foundations of bioethics. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986:251.
8. Veatch RM. A theory of medical ethics. New York: Basic Books, 1981:45.
9. Wicclair MR. Informed consent and research involving the newly dead. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 2002;12:351-3, 372.
10. Veatch RM. Abandoning informed consent. Hastings Cent Rep 1995;25:5-12.
11. Quo RZ. GAT has bioethics to offer the developing countries. Bioethics 1993;7:108-25.
12. Luna F. Paternalism and the argument for illiteracy. Bioethics 1995;9:283-90.
13. Weiss GB. Paternalism modernised. J Med Ethics 1985;11:184-7.
14. Habiba MA. Examining consent within the patient-doctor relationship. J Med Ethics 2000;26:183-7.
15. Komrad MS. A defence of medical paternalism: maximising patient's autonomy. J Med Ethics 1983;9:38-44.
16. Silverman WA. The myth of informed consent in daily practice and in clinical trials. J Med Ethics 1989;15:6-11, at 7.
17. Dula A. Bearing the brunt of the new regulations: minority populations. Hastings Cent Rep 1997;27:11-12.
18. Katz J. Blurring the lines: research, therapy, and IRBs. Hastings Cent Rep 1997;27:9-11.
19. Beauchamp TL, Jennings B, Kinney ED, et al. Pharmaceutical research involving the homeless. J Med Philos 2002;27:547-64, 557-8.
20. Cox C, MacPherson CNL. Modified informed consent in viral seroprevalence study in the Caribbean. Bioethics 1996; 10 222-32.
21. Resnik DB. The ethics of HIV research in developing nations. Bioethics 1998;12:286-306.
22. Hewlett S. Consent to clinical trials: preliminary study of the views of prospective participants. J Med Ethics 1996;22:232-7.
23. Evans M. Justified deception? The single blind placebo in drug research. J Med Ethics 2000;26:188-93.
24. Bok S. Shading the truth and seeking informed consent for research purposes. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 1995;5:1-17.
25. Levine RJ. The "best proven therapeutic method" standard in clinical trials in technologically developing countries. J Clin Ethics 1998;9:167-72, 170.
26. Levine C. Placebos and HIV. Lessons learned. Hastings Cent Rep 1998;28:43-8 at 45.
27. Glantz LH, Annas GJ, Grodin MA, et al. Research in developing countries: taking "benefit" seriously. Hastings Cent Rep 1998;28:38-42 at 39.
28. Clark PA. The ethics of placebo controlled trials for perinatal transmission of HIV in developing countries. J Clin Ethics 1998;9:156-66 at161.
29. Grady C. Science in the service of healing. Hastings Cent Rep 1998;28:34-8 at 37.
30. Council for International Organisations of Medical Sciences. Ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects. Geneva: CIOMS, 2002:19-20.
31. Macklin R. After Helsinki: unresolved issues in international research. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 2001;11:17-36 at 33.
32. Moreno JD. Goodbye to all that: the end of moderate protectionism in human subject research. Hastings Cent Rep 2001; 31:9-17 at 16.
33. Cooley D. Good enough for the Third World. J Med Philos 2000;25:427-50.
34. Mastroiani A, Kahn J. Swinging on the pendulum: shifting views of justice in human subjects research. Hastings Cent Rep 2001;31:21-8.
35. Pullman D. Conflicting interests, social justice and proxy consent to research. J Med Philos 2002;27:523-45.
36. Kottow M. The vulnerable and the susceptible. Bioethics. In press.
37. Gillet G. Informed consent and moral integrity. J Med Ethics 1989;15:117-23.
38. Eckenwiler L. Moral reasoning and the review of research involving human subjects. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 2001; 11 37-69.
39. Savulescu J. Rational non-interventional paternalism: why doctors ought to make judgments of what is best for their patients. J Med Ethics 1995;21:327-31.
40. Savulescu J, Momeyer RW. Should informed consent be based on rational beliefs? J Med Ethics 1997;23:282-8.
41. Madder H. Existential autonomy: why patients should make their own choices. J Med Ethics 1997;23:221-5.