Moral reasoning and the review of research involving human subjects

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 37-69

  Eckenwiler, Lisa ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CONSUMER; DISEASE TRANSMISSION; ETHICS; ETHNIC GROUP; GENETICS; GOVERNMENT; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HISTORY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PREGNANT WOMAN; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; RESEARCH SUBJECT; STANDARD; UNITED STATES; VULNERABLE POPULATION;

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; DISEASE TRANSMISSION, VERTICAL; ETHICAL ANALYSIS; ETHICAL REVIEW; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; ETHNIC GROUPS; FEDERAL GOVERNMENT; GENETIC RESEARCH; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HIV INFECTIONS; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; PREGNANT WOMEN; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; UNITED STATES; VULNERABLE POPULATIONS;

EID: 0035279972     PISSN: 10546863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/ken.2001.0003     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Angell, Marcia. 2000. Is Academic Medicine for Sale? New England Journal of Medicine 342: 1516-18.
2. Balsamo, Anne. 1999. Public Pregnancies and Cultural Narratives of Surveillance. In her Technologies of the Gendered Body: Reading Cyborg Women, pp. 80-115. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
3. Barber, Benjamin. 1984. Strong Democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4. Bell, Nora Kizer. 1992. Women and AIDS: Too Little, Too Late? In Feminist Perspectives in Medical Ethics, ed. Helen Bequaert Holmes and Laura M. Purdy, pp. 42-62. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
5. Benhabib, Seyla. 1992. Situating the Self: Gender, Community, and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. New York: Routledge.
6. Blum, Lawrence A. 1994. Moral Perception and Particularity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Blumenthal, David, and Meyer, Gregg S. 1996. Academic Health Centers in a Changing Environment. Health Affairs 15: 200-15.
8. Bohman, James. 1995. Democracy and Cultural Pluralism. Political Theory 23: 253-79.
9. Carse, Alisa L. 1998. Impartial Principle and Moral Context: Securing a Place for the Particular in Ethical Theory. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23: 153-69.
10. Caschetta, Mary Beth. 1993. The Identity Politics of Biomedical Research: Clinical Trials, Medical Knowledge, and the Female Body. SIECUS Report 22 (1): 1-6.
11. Charo, R. Alta. 1993. Protecting Us to Death: Women, Pregnancy, and Clinical Research Trials. St. Louis Law Journal 38: 135-88.
12. Cohen, Joshua. 1996. Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy. In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. Seyla Benhabib, pp. 95-119. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. Coleman, B. C. 1996. AMA Backs Mandatory HIV Tests for All Pregnant Women: Critics Fear Some Will Avoid Prenatal Care. Washington Post (28 June): A02.
14. Cooke, Robert A.; Tannenbaum, Arnold S.; and Gray, Bradford. 1978. A Survey of IRBs and Research Involving Human Subjects: A Report to the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. In US DHEW, NCPHSBBR, Report and Recommendations: IRBs, Appendix. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. DHEW Publication no. (OS) 78-0009.
15. Cotton, D. J.; Finkelstein, Diane M.; He, Weili; and Feinberg, Judith. 1993. Determinants of Accrual of Women to a Large, Multicenter Clinical Trials Program of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 6: 1322-28.
16. DHEW. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. 1978. Institutional Review Boards: Report and Recommendations of the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Federal Register 43: 56174-97.
17. DHHS. Department of Health and Human Services. 1996. Informed Consent and Waiver of Informed Consent Requirements in Certain Emergency Research. Federal Register 61: 51497-533.
18. _. Office of the Inspector General. 1998. Institutional Review Boards: A Time for Reform. Washington, DC: Office of the Inspector General, 11 June.
19. _. Office of the Inspector General. 2000. Protecting Human Research Subjects: Status of Recommendations. Washington, DC: Office of the Inspector General, April.
20. Dresser, Rebecca. 1992. Wanted: Single, White Male for Medical Research. Hastings Center Report 22 (1): 24-29.
21. Duval, Benjamin S., Jr. 1979. The Human Subjects Committee: An Experiment in Decentralized Federal Regulation. American Bar Foundation Research Journal 571: 571-688.
22. Eckenwiler, Lisa A. 1998a. Attention to Difference and Women's Consent to Research. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research 20 (6): 6-11.
23. _. 1998b. Women and Communities in Clinical Research: Questioning the Influence of Communitarian Ideals. In Social Philosophy Today, Volume 13, ed. Yeager Hudson, pp. 171-201. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Meilen Press.
24. Edgar, Harold, and Rothman, David J. 1995. The Institutional Review Board and Beyond: Future Challenges to the Ethics of Human Experimentation. The Milbank Quarterly 73: 489-506.
25. Epstein, Steven. 1995. The Construction of Lay Expertise: AIDS Activism and the Forging of Credibility in the Reform of Clinical Trials. Science, Technology, and Human Values 20: 408-37.
26. Faden, Ruth; Kass, Nancy; and McGraw, Deven. 1996. Women as Vessels and Vectors: Lessons from the HIV Epidemic. In Feminism and Bioethics: Beyond Reproduction, ed. Susan M. Wolf, pp. 252-81. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Friedman, Marilyn. 1993. The Impracticality of Impartiality. In her What Are Friends For?: Feminist Perspectives on Personal Relationships and Moral Theory, p. 9-34. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
28. Ghio, Joan M. 1979. The Role of the Community and Lay Participants in IRB Deliberations. In The Role and Function of IRBs and the Protection of Human Subjects, ed. Kathryn Oliver, Denise Provost, and Jean Rachlin, p. 159. A symposium sponsored by Public Responsibility in Medicine and Research and co-sponsored by Boston University School of Medicine, Cambridge, MA, 29-30 March.
29. _. 1980. What Is the Role of a Public Member on an IRB? IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research 2 (2): 7.
30. Gostin, Lawrence O. 1995. Informed Consent, Cultural Sensitivity, and Respect for Persons. Journal of the American Medical Association 274: 844-45.
31. Hamilton, Jean, and Parry, Barbara. 1983. Sex-Related Difference in Clinical Drug Response: Implications for Women's Health. Journal of the American Medical Women's Association 38 (5): 126-32.
32. Harding, Sandra. 1993. Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What is 'Strong Objectivity'? In Feminist Epistemologies, ed. Linda Alcoff and Elizabeth Potter, pp. 49-82. New York: Routledge.
33. _. 1995. "Strong Objectivity": A Response to the New Objectivity Question. Synthese 104: 331-49.
34. Hare, R. M. 1987. Moral Thinking. New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Hartsock, Nancy C. M. 1987. The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism. In Feminism and Methodology: Social Science Issues, ed. Sandra Harding, pp. 157-80. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
36. Indigenous Peoples Council on Biopiracy. 1998. Implications of Genetic Research for Indigenous Peoples. Available at http:\\www.ipcb.org.
37. James Bell Associates. 1998. Evaluation of NIH Implementation of Section 491 of the PHS Act, Mandating a Program of Protection for Research Subjects. Prepared for the Office of Extramural Research, Arlington, VA.
38. Kass, Nancy E.; Taylor, Holly A.; and King, Patricia A. 1996. Harms of Excluding Pregnant Women from Medical Research: The Case of HIV-Infected Pregnant Women. Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics 24: 36-46.
39. Levine, Robert J. 1978. The Institutional Review Board. In US DHEW, NCPHSBBR, Report and Recommendations: IRBs, Appendix, pp. 4-1-4-73. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. DHEW Publication no. (OS) 78-0009.
40. _. 1995. Research Ethics Committees. In Encyclopedia of Bioethics, ed. Warren T. Reich, pp. 2266-70. New York: Macmillan.
41. Little, Miles. 1999. Research Ethics and Conflicts of Interest. Journal of Medical Ethics 25: 259-62.
42. Mansbridge, Jane. 1992. A Deliberative Theory of Interest Representation. In The Politics of Interests: Interest Groups Transformed, ed. Mark Patracca. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
43. McNeill, Paul M. 1993. The Ethics and Politics of Human Experimentation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44. _; Berglund, Catherine A.; and Webster, Ian W. 1994. How Much Influence Do Various Members Have Within Research Ethics Committees? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 3: 522-32.
45. Meyers, Karin. 1979. Power Politics and IRBs. [Letter.] New England Journal of Medicine 301: 1129.
46. NBAC. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. 1998. Research Involving Persons with Mental Disorders Affecting Decisionmaking Capacity: Report and Recommendations. Rockville, MD: NBAC.
47. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. 1978. Report and Recommendations: Institutional Review Boards. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. DHEW Publication no. (OS) 78-0008.
48. _. 1979. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
49. NIH. National Institutes of Health. 1994. Guidelines Concerning the Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research. Federal Register 59: 14507-13.
50. _. Office of Research on Women's Health. 1995. Recruitment and Retention of Women in Clinical Studies. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health.
51. Oberman, Michelle. 1994. Real and Perceived Barriers to the Inclusion of Women in Clinical Trials. In Reframing Women's Health: Multidisciplinary Research and Practice, ed. Alice J. Dan, pp. 266-76. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Press.
52. Porter, Joan. 1986. What Are the Ideal Characteristics of Unaffiliated/Nonscientist IRB Members? IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research 8 (3): 1-6.
53. _. 1987. How Unaffiliated/Nonscientist Members See Their Roles. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research 9 (6): 1-6.
54. Robertson, John A. 1979. Ten Ways to Improve IRBs. Hastings Center Report 9 (1): 29-33.
55. Roseman, Kenneth. 1987. Man-Child in a Promised Land: A Layman Serves on the Human Subjects Committee. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research 9 (2): 8-10.
56. Rothenberg, Karen, and Paskey, Stephen J. 1995. The Risk of Domestic Violence and Women with HIV Infection: Implications for Partner Notification, Public Policy, and the Law. American Journal of Public Health 85: 1569-76.
57. Spragens, Thomas. 1990. Reason and Democracy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
58. Starr, Paul. 1982 . The Social Transformation of American Medicine. New York: Basic Books.
59. Walker, Margaret Urban. 1989. Moral Understandings: Alternative "Epistemology" for a Feminist Ethics. Hypatia 4 (2): 15-28.
60. _. 1991. Partial Consideration. Ethics 101: 758-74.
61. Weijer, Charles M. 1999. Protecting Communities in Research: Philosophical and Pragmatic Challenges. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8: 501-13.
62. _, and Emanuel, Ezekiel J. 2000. Protecting Communities in Biomedical Research. Science 289: 1142-44.
63. Weijer, Charles M.; Goldsand, Gary; and Emanuel, Ezekiel J. 1999. Protecting Communities in Research: Current Guidelines and Limits of Extrapolation. Nature Genetics 23: 275-80.
64. Wenger, Nanette K. 1992. Exclusion of the Elderly and Women from Coronary Trials: Is Their Quality of Care Compromised? Journal of the American Medical Association 268: 1460-61.
65. White House Press Release. 1997. Remarks by the President in Apology for the Study Done in Tuskegee, 16 May.
66. Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
67. _. 1996. Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy. In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. Seyla Benhabib, pp. 120-35. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
68. _. 1997. Assymetrical Reciprocity: On Moral Respect, Wonder, and Enlarged Thought. In Intersecting Voices: Dilemmas of Gender, Political Philosophy, and Policy, pp. 38-59. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.