β-Cyclodextrin Host-Guest Complexes Probed under Thermodynamic Equilibrium: Thermodynamics and AFM Force Spectroscopy

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 126, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 1577-1584

  Auletta, Tommaso ^a   De Jong, Menno R ^a   Mulder, Alart ^a   Van Veggel, Frank C J M ^a,d   Huskens, Jurriaan ^a   Reinhoudt, David N ^a   Zou, Shan ^b   Zapotoczny, Szczepan ^b,e   Schönherr, Holger ^b   Vancso, G Julius ^b   Kuipers, Laurens ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^c FOM INSTITUTE AMOLF   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

^e JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; MOLECULAR SPECTROSCOPY; MONOLAYERS; SURFACE PLASMON RESONANCE; THERMODYNAMIC STABILITY;

Β-CYCLODEXTRIN HEPTATHIOETHER MONOLAYERS;

ETHERS;

ADAMANTANE DERIVATIVE; ANILINE DERIVATIVE; BETA CYCLODEXTRIN; GOLD; MERCAPTOETHANOL; SULFIDE; TOLUIDINE DERIVATIVE;

AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; COMPLEX FORMATION; HISTOGRAM; MICROCALORIMETRY; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; SPECTROSCOPY; SURFACE PLASMON RESONANCE; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 10744229173     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja0383569     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Israelachvili, J. N.; Tabor, D. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 1972, 331, 19-38.
2. Binnig, G.; Quate, C. F.; Gerber, C. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1986, 56, 930-933.
3. Putman, C. A. J.; DeGrooth, B. D.; Van Hulst, N. F.; Greve, J. J. Appl. Phys. 1992, 72, 6-12.
4. (a) Evans, E.; Ritchie, K.; Merkel, R. Biophys. J. 1995, 68, 2580-2587.
5. (b) Kuo, S. C.; Sheetz, M. P. Science 1993, 260, 232-234 and references cited herein.
6. Other techniques utilize magnetic beads, optical tweezers, microneedles, and biomembrane force probes with typical force ranges of 0.1-100 pN, 0.1-150 pN, >0.1 pN, and 0.5-1000 pN, respectively (see, for example, Clausen-Schaumann, H.; Seitz, M.; Krautbauer, R.; Gaub H. E. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2000, 4, 524-530).
7. (a) Frisbie, C. D.; Rozsnyai, L. F.; Noy, A.; Wrighton, M. S.; Lieber, C. M. Science 1994, 265, 2071-2074.
8. (b) Noy, A.; Vezenov, D. V.; Lieber, C. M. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 1997. 27, 381-421.
9. For sub-50-nm resolution mapping of functional group distributions in surface-modified polymers, see: (a) Schönherr, H.; Hruska, Z.; Vancso, G. J. Macromolecules 2000, 33, 4532-4537.
10. (b) Schönherr, H.; van Os, M. T.; Hruska, Z.; Kurdi, J.; Förch, R.; Arefi-Khonsari, F.; Knoll, W.; Vancso G. J. J. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 2000, 1303-1304.
11. (c) Schönherr, H.; van Os, M. T.; Förch, R.; Timmons, R. B.; Knoll, W.; Vancso G. J. Chem. Mater. 2000, 12, 3689-3694.
12. For recent reviews, see: (a) Hugel, T.; Seitz, M. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2001, 22, 989-1016.
13. (b) Zlatanova, J.; Lindsay, S. M.; Leuba, S. H. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2000, 74, 37-61.
14. (c) Janshoff, A.; Neitzert, M.; Oberdörfer, Y.; Fuchs, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3212-3237.
15. (d) Samorì, B. Chem.-Eur. J. 2000, 6, 4249-4255.
16. (a) Florin, E.-L.; Moy, V. T.; Gaub, H. E. Science 1994, 264, 415-417.
17. (b) Moy, V. T.; Florin, E.-L.; Gaub, H. E. Science 1994, 266, 257-259.
18. Lee, G. U.; Chrisey, L. A.; Colton, R. J. Science 1994, 266, 771-773.
19. Ros, R.; Schwesinger, F.; Anselmetti, D.; Kubon, M.; Schäfer, R.; Plückthun, A.; Tiefenauer, L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 7402-7405.
20. Grandbois, M.; Beyer, M.; Rief, M.; Clausen-Schaumann, H.; Gaub, H. E. Science 1999, 283, 1727-1730.
21. McKendry, R.; Theoclitou, M.-E.; Rayment, T.; Abell, C. Nature 1998, 391, 566-568.
22. Skulason, H.; Frisbie, C. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 15125-15133.
23. Kado, S.; Kimura, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 4560-4564.
24. (a) Grubmuller, H.; Heymann, B.; Tavan, P. Science 1996, 271, 997-999.
25. (b) Heymann, B.; Grubmuller, H. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 84, 6126-6129.
26. (c) Heymann, B.; Grubmuller, H. Biophys. J. 2001, 81, 1295-1313.
27. (d) Rief, M.; Grubmuller, H. ChemPhysChem 2002, 3, 255-261.
28. Bell, G. I. Science 1978, 200, 618-627.
29. (a) Hummer, G.; Szabo, A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98, 3658-3661.
30. (b) Hummer, G.; Szabo, A. Biophys. J. 2003, 85, 5-15.
31. (a) Seifert, U. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 84, 2750-2753.
32. (b) Seifert, U. Europhys. Lett. 2002, 58, 792-798.
33. (a) Rief, M.; Clausen-Schaumann, H.; Gaub, H. E. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1999, 6, 346-349.
34. (b) Essevaz-Roulez, B.; Bockelmann, U.; Heslot, F. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997, 94, 11935-11940.
35. Tromas, C.; Rojo, J.; de la Fuente, J. M.; Barrientos, A. G.; García, R.; Penadés, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3052-3055.
36. (a) Rief, M.; Gautel, M.; Osterhelt, F.; Fernandez, J. M.; Gaub, H. E. Science 1997, 276, 1109-1112.
37. (b) Fritz, J.; Katopodis, A. G.; Kolbinger, F.; Anselmetti, D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 12283-12288.
38. (c) Marszalek, P. E.; Lu, H.; Li, H.; Carrion-Vazquez, M.; Oberhauser, A. F. Nature 1999, 402, 100-103.
39. (d) Strunz, T.; Oroszlan, K.; Shafer, R.; Güntherodt, H.-J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96, 11277-11282.
40. (e) Evans E.; Ludwig, F. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2000, 12, 315-320.
41. (f) Baumgartner, W.; Hinterdorfer, P.; Ness, W.; Raab, A.; Vestweber, D. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97, 4005-4010.
42. (g) Lee, I.; Marchant, R. E. Surf. Sci. 2001, 491, 433-443.
43. (a) Evans, E.; Ritchie, K. Biophys. J. 1997, 72, 1541-1555.
44. (b) Merkel, R.; Nassoy, P.; Leung, A.; Ritchie, K.; Evans, E. Nature 1999, 397, 50-53.
45. Schönherr, H.; Beulen, M. W. J.; Bügler, J.; Huskens, J.; van Veggel, F. C. J. M.; Reinhoudt, D. N.; Vancso, G. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4963-4967.
46. Zapotoczny, S.; Auletta, T.; De Jong, M. R.; Schönherr, H.; Huskens, J.; van Veggel, F. C. J. M.; Reinhoudt, D. N.; Vancso, G. J. Langmuir 2002, 18, 6988-6994.
47. (a) Wenz, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 803-822.
48. (b) Chem. Rev. 1998, 98. 1741-2076.
49. (c) Szejtli, J. Comprehensive Supramolecular Chemistry; Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1996; Vol. 3.
50. Rekharsky, M. V.; Inoue, Y. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 1875-1917.
51. De Jong, M. R.; Huskens, J.; Reinhoudt, D. N. Chem.-Eur. J. 2001, 7, 4164-4170.
52. There appear to be some differences in the probabilities for observing multiple force quanta, for example, for 3 (Figure 3B), which may arise from: (i) differences in solubilities and adsorptivities of the guest thiols leading to different guest-mercaptoethanol ratios on the tip than present in solution, (ii) different degrees of clustering of guests on the tip, rendering some guest molecules inaccessible for binding, and (iii) variations in tip geometry and tip-surface contact areas.
53. The data in the histograms were treated as described in refs 24 and 25.
54. Noise levels were ∼15 pN. Plots of peak position from the histograms versus peak number yielded straight lines, with the force quantum as the slope (see also ref 25).
55. Cleveland, J. P.; Schäffer, T. E.; Hansma, P. K. Phys. Rev. B 1995, 52, R8692-R8695.
56. Willemsen, O. H.; Kuipers, L.; Van der Werf, K. O.; De Grooth, B.; Greve, J. Langmuir 2000, 16, 4339-4347.
57. (a) Pangali, C. S.; Rao, M.; Berne, B. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1979, 71, 2975-2981.
58. (b) Jorgensen, W. L. Acc. Chem. Res. 1989, 22, 184-189.
59. The measured pull-off forces did not vary for nominal spacings of the data points between 1 and 10 A.
60. -1 (see the Supporting Information).
61. out-of-contact to the energy difference between the two minima, eliminating the need for the numerical integration (see the Supporting Information). Here, the interaction potential at the well of the "contact" minimum is also fitted to a harmonic potential. This analysis shows that the probability distribution depends only marginally on the "stiffness" of the complex (which governs the harmonic interaction potential and which is directly related to the well width s).
62. contact significantly different from either 0 or 1, and therefore switching between the "contact" and " out-of-contact" states may be observed.
63. Godínez, L. A.; Schwartz, L.; Criss, C. M.; Kaifer, A. E. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 3376-3380.
64. Schönherr, H.; Vancso, G. J.; Huisman, B.-H.; van Veggel, F. C. J. M.; Reinhoudt, D. N. Langmuir 1999, 15, 5541-5546.
65. Tortonese, M.; Kirk, M. Proc. SPIE 1997, 3009, 53-60.
66. (a) Hutter, J. L.; Bechhoefer, J. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1993, 64, 1868-1873.
67. (b) Sader, J. E. J. Appl. Phys. 1998, 84, 64-76.
68. Lenferink, A. T. M.; Kooyman, R. P. H.; Greve, J. Sens. Actuators, B 1991, 3, 261-265.
69. Jorgensen, W. L.; Chandrasekhar, J.; Madura, J. D.; Impey, R. W.; Klein, M. L. J. Chem. Phys. 1983. 79, 926-935.
70. Berendsen, H. J. C.; Postma, J. P. M.; Dinola, A.; Van Gunsteren, W. F.; Haak, J. R. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 81, 3684-3690.