Enzyme classification by ligand binding

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 711-724

  Izrailev, Sergei ^a   Farnum, Michael A ^a  

^a JOHNSON AND JOHNSON PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

Author keywords

Biochemical function; Enzyme classification; Functional genomics; Point set similarity; Protein ligand interaction

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA BASE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME ANALYSIS; ENZYMOLOGY; GENOMICS; LIGAND BINDING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

5'-NUCLEOTIDASE; ENZYMES; LIGANDS; PROTEIN BINDING; VIBRIO FISCHERI;

EID: 10344234689     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20277     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Webb EC, editor. Enzyme Nomenclature. Recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. New York: Academic Press; 1992. Available online at http://www.chem.qmul.ac.uk/ iubmb/enzyme/
2. Tian W, Skolnick J. How well is enzyme function conserved as a function of pairwise sequence identity? J Mol Biol 2003;333:863-882.
3. Rost B. Enzyme function less conserved than anticipated. J Mol Biol 2002;318:595-608.
4. Babbitt PC. Definitions of enzyme function for the structural genomics era. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2003;7:230-237.
5. Kim SH, Shin DH, Choi IG, Schulze-Gahmen U, Chen S, Kim R. Structure-based functional inference in structural genomics. J Struct Funct Genomics 2003;4:129-135.
6. Todd AE, Orengo CA, Thornton JM. Evolution of function in protein superfamilies, from a structural perspective. J Mol Biol 2001;307:1113-1143.
7. Berman HM, Battistuz T, Bhat TN, Bluhm WF, Bourne PE, Burkhardt K, Feng Z, Gilliland GL, Iype L, Jain S, Fagan P, Marvin J, Padilla D, Ravichandran V, Schneider B, Thanki N, Weissig H, Westbrook JD, Zardecki C. The Protein Data Bank. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2002;58:899-907.
8. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:235-242.
9. Campbell SJ, Gold ND, Jackson RM, Westhead DR. Ligand binding: functional site location, similarity and docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2003;13:389-395.
10. Kinoshita K, Nakamura H. Protein informatics towards function identification. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2003;13:396-400.
11. Shehadi IA, Yang H, Ondrechen MJ. Future directions in protein function prediction. Mol Biol Rep 2002;29:329-335.
12. Wallace AC, Borkakoti N, Thoraton JM. TESS: a geometric hashing algorithm for deriving 3D coordinate templates for searching structural databases: application to enzyme active sites. Protein Sci 1997;6:2308-2323.
13. Milik M, Szalma S, Olszewski KA. Common Structural Cliques: a tool for protein structure and function analysis. Protein Eng 2003;16:543-552.
14. Schmitt S, Kuhn D, Klebe G. A new method to detect related function among proteins independent of sequence and fold homology. J Mol Biol 2002;323:387-406.
15. Kinoshita K, Nakamura H. Identification of protein biochemical functions by similarity search using the molecular surface database eF-site. Protein Sci 2003;12:1589-1595.
16. Dobson PD, Doig AJ. Distinguishing enzyme structures from non-enzymes without alignments. J Mol Biol 2003;330:771-783.
17. Laskowski RA, Watson JD, Thornton JM. From protein structure to biochemical function? J Struct Funct Genomics 2003;4:167-177.
18. Kauvar LM, Higgins DL, Villar HO, Sportsman JR, Engqvist-Goldstein A, Bukar R, Bauer KE, Dilley H, Rocke DM. Predicting ligand binding to proteins by affinity fingerprinting. Chem Biol 1995;2:107-118.
19. Kauvar LM, Villar HO, Sportsman JR, Higgins DL, Schmidt DE, Jr. Protein affinity map of chemical space. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 1998;715:93-102.
20. Frye SV. Structure-activity relationship homology (SARAH): a conceptual framework for drug discovery in the genomic era. Chem Biol 1999;6:R3-R7.
21. Greenbaum DC, Arnold WD, Lu F, Hayrapetian L, Baruch A, Krumrine J, Toba S, Chehade K, Bromme D, Kuntz ID, Bogyo M. Small molecule affinity fingerprinting: a tool for enzyme family subclassification, target identification, and inhibitor design. Chem Biol 2002;9:1085-1094.
22. Hergenrother PJ, Depew KM, Schreiber SL. Small-molecule microarrays: covalent attachment and screening of alcohol-containing small molecules on glass slides. J Amer Chem Soc 2000;122:7849-7850.
23. MicroCal. VP-Capillary DSC Platform. Northampton, MA: MicroCal LLC;2000.
24. Pantoliano MW, Petrella EC, Kwasnoski JD, Lobanov VS, Myslik J, Graf E, Carver T, Asel E, Springer BA, Lane P, Salemme FR. High-density miniaturized thermal shift assays as a general strategy for drug discovery. J Biomol Screen 2001;6:429-440.
25. Pantoliano MW, Salemme FR, Carver TE. High throughput method for functionally classifying proteins identified using a genomics approach. U.S. Patent Application, Serial No. US 2002/ 0168686 A1, published Nov. 14, 2002, Patent 0168686 A1.
26. Horn F, Weare J, Beukers MW, Horsch S, Bairoch A, Chen W, Edvardsen O, Campagne F, Vriend G. GPCRDB: an information system for G protein-coupled receptors. Nucleic Acids Res 1998;26:275-279.
27. Horn F, Vriend G, Cohen FE. Collecting and harvesting biological data: the GPCRDB and NucleaRDB information systems. Nucleic Acids Res 2001;29:346-349.
28. Le Novere N, Changeux JP. LGICdb: the ligand-gated ion channel database. Nucleic Acids Res 2001;29:294-295.
29. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Kawashima S, Nakaya A. The KEGG databases at GenomeNet. Nucleic Acids Res 2002;30:42-46.
30. Goto S, Okuno Y, Hattori M, Nishioka T, Kanehisa M. LIGAND: database of chemical compounds and reactions in biological pathways. Nucleic Acids Res 2002;30:402-404.
31. Schomburg I, Hofmann O, Baensch C, Chang A, Schomburg D. Enzyme data and metabolic information: BRENDA, a resource for research in biology, biochemistry, and medicine. Gene Funct Disease 2000;1:109-118.
32. Schomburg I, Chang A, Ebeling C, Gremse M, Heldt C, Huhn G, Schomburg D. BRENDA, the enzyme database: updates and major new developments [Database issue]. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32:D431-D433.
33. Schomburg I, Chang A, Hofmann O, Ebeling C, Ehrentreich F, Schomburg D. BRENDA: a resource for enzyme data and metabolic information. Trends Biochem Sci 2002;27:54-56.
34. Schomburg I, Chang A, Schomburg D. BRENDA, enzyme data and metabolic information. Nucleic Acids Res 2002;30:47-49.
35. Overbeek R, Larsen N, Pusch GD, D'Souza M, Selkov E Jr, Kyrpides N, Fonstein M, Maltsev N, Selkov E. WIT: integrated system for high-throughput genome sequence analysis and metabolic reconstruction. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:123-125.
36. Bader GD, Betel D, Hogue CW. BIND: the Biomolecular Interaction Network Database. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:248-250.
37. Hendlich M, Bergner A, Gunther J, Klebe G. Relibase: design and development of a database for comprehensive analysis of protein-ligand interactions. J Mol Biol 2003;326:607-620.
38. Clowney L, Westbrook J, Berman HM. Building a database of high resolution crystallographic models for common macromolecular ligands. Paper presented July 21-22, 1997 St. Louis, MO.
39. Chen X, Liu M, Gilson MK. BindingDB: a web-accessible molecular recognition database. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 2001;4:719-725.
40. Chen X, Lin Y, Liu M, Gilson MK. The Binding Database: data management and interface design. Bioinformatics 2002;18:130-139.
41. Chen X, Lin Y, Gilson MK. The binding database: overview and user's guide. Biopolymers 2001;61:127-141.
42. MDL Drug Data Report. MDL Information Systems Inc. San Leandro, CA. 2002.
43. Daylight CIS I. World Drug Index. Mission Viejo, CA. 2004.
44. Schuffenhauer A, Zimmermann J, Stoop R, van der Vyver JJ, Lecchini S, Jacoby E. An ontology for pharmaceutical ligands and its application for in silico screening and library design. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2002;42:947-955.
45. Schuffenhauer A, Floersheim P, Acklin P, Jacoby E. Similarity metrics for ligands reflecting the similarity of the target proteins. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2003;43:391-405.
46. James CA, Weininger D, Delany J. Daylight theory manual. Daylight Chemical Information Systems, Inc.; Mission Viejo, CA. 2000.
47. Bairoch A. The ENZYME database in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:304-305.
48. Hall LH, Kier LB. The molecular connectivity chi indexes and kappa shape indexes in structure-property modeling. In: Lipkowitz KB, editor. Reviews in computational chemistry. New York: VCH Publishers; 1991. p 367-422.
49. Hall LH, Kier LB. Issues in representation of molecular structure: the development of molecular connectivity. J Mol Graph Model 2001;20:4-18.
50. Alves R, Chaleil RA, Sternberg MJ. Evolution of enzymes in metabolism: a network perspective. J Mol Biol 2002;320:751-770.
51. Agrafiotis DK, Lobanov VS, Salemme FR. Combinatorial informatics in the post-genomics era. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2002;1:337-346.
52. Sanishvili R, Yakunin AF, Laskowski RA, Skarina T, Evdokimova E, Doherty-Kirby A, Lajoie GA, Thornton JM, Arrowsmith CH, Savchenko A, Joachimiak A, Edwards AM. Integrating structure, bioinformatics, and enzymology to discover function: BioH, a new carboxylesterase from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 2003;278:26039-26045.
53. Tomczyk NH, Nettleship JE, Baxter RL, Crichton HJ, Webster SP, Campopiano DJ. Purification and characterisation of the BIOH protein from the biotin biosynthetic pathway. FEBS Lett 2002;513:299-304.
54. Willett P. Similarity-based approaches to virtual screening. Biochem Soc Trans 2003;31:603-606.
55. Strausberg RL, Schreiber SL. From knowing to controlling: a path from genomics to drugs using small molecule probes. Science 2003;300:294-295.