How general is the model? Analyzing the applicability of the internal/external frame of reference model to more than two school subjects;Wie generell ist das Modell? Analysen zum Geltungsbereich des «internal/External Frame of Reference»-Modells

Zeitschrift fur Padagogische Psychologie

Volumn 18, Issue 3-4, 2004, Pages 221-230

  Schilling, Susanne R ^a   Sparfeldt, Jörn R ^a   Rost, Detlef H ^a  

^a PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Academic achievement; Academic self concept; Comparison processes; I E model

Indexed keywords

EID: 10244255281     PISSN: 10100652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1024/1010-0652.18.4.221     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Arbuckle, J. L. (1999), Amos 4.01 [Computer software]. Chicago: Smallwaters.
2. Bong, M. (1998). Tests of the internal/external frames of reference model with subject-specific academic self-efficacy and frame specific academic self-concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 102-110.
3. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modelling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Dickhäuser, O. (2003). Überprüfung des erweiterten Modells des internal/external frame of reference. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 35, 200-207.
5. Helmke, A. (1992). Selbstvertrauen und schulische Leistungen. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
6. Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G. ̈ Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151-173.
7. Lüdtke, O., Köller, O., Artelt, C., Stanat, P. ̈ Baumert, J. (2002). Eine Überprüfung von Modellen zur Genese akademischer Selbstkonzepte: Ergebnisse aus der PISA-Studie. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 16, 151-164.
8. Marsh, H. W. (1986). Verbal and maths self-concepts: An internal/ external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 129-149.
9. Marsh, H. W. (1990a). Causal ordering of academic self-concept and academic achievement: Amultiwave, longitudinal panel analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 646-656.
10. Marsh, H.W. (1990b). A multidimensional, hierarchical model of self-concept: Theoretical and empirical justification. Educational Psychology Review, 2, 77-172.
11. Marsh, H. W. (1990c). The structure of academic self-concept: The Marsh/Shavelson model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 623-636.
12. Marsh, H. W., Byrne, B. M. & Shavelson, R. J. (1988). A multifaceted academic self-concept: Its hierarchical structure and its relation to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 366-380.
13. Marsh, H.W. & Craven, R. (1997). Academic self-concept: Beyond the dustbowl. In G. D. Phye (Ed.), Handbook of classroom assessment: Learning, adjustment and achievement (pp. 131-198). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
14. Marsh, H. W., Kong, C.-K. & Hau, K.-T. (2001). Extension of the internal/external frame of reference model of self-concept formation: Importance of native and nonnative languages for Chinese students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 543-553.
15. Marsh, H. W. & O'Neill, R. (1984). Self description questionnaire III: The construct validity of multidimensional self-concept ratings by late adolescents. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 153-174.
16. Marsh, H. W. & Yeung, A. S. (2001). An extension of the internal/external frame of reference model: A response to Bong (1998). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 389-420.
17. Möller, J. & Köller, O. (2001a). Dimensional comparisons: An experimental approach to the internal/exter-nal frame of reference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 826-835.
18. Möller, J. & Köller, O. (2001b). Frame of reference effects following the announcement of exam results. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 277-287.
19. Möller, J. & Köller, O. (2004). Die Genese akademischer Selbstkonzepte: Effekte dimensionaler und sozialer Vergleiche. Psychologische Rundschau, 55, 19-27.
20. Möller, J., Pohlmann, B., Streblow, L. & Kauffmann, J. (2002). Die Spezifität von Begabungsüberzeugungen als Determinante des verbalen und mathematischen Begabungsselbstkonzepts. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 16, 87-97.
21. Möller, J., Streblow, L., Pohlmann, B. & Köller, O. (2003). An extension to the classical internal/external frame of reference model: assimilation and contrast effects. Manuscript submitted for publication.
22. Nasser, F. & Wisenbaker, J. (2003). A monte carlo study investigating the impact of item parceling on measures of fit in confirmatory factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 729-757.
23. Rost, D. H., Dickhäuser, O., Sparfeldt, J. R. & Schilling, S. R. (2004). Fachspezifische Selbstkonzepte und Schulleistungen im dimensionalen Vergleich: Eine versuchsplanerische Veranschaulichung von Vorhersagen des I/E-Modells. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 18, 43-52.
24. Rost, D. H. & Sparfeldt, J. R. (2002). Facetten des schulischen Selbstkonzepts. Ein Verfahren zur Messung des differentiellen Selbstkonzepts schulischer Leistungen und Fähigkeiten (DISK-Gitter). Diagnostica, 48, 130-140.
25. Skaalvik, E. M. & Rankin, R. J. (1992). Math and verbal achievement and self-concepts: Testing the internal/external frame of reference model. Journal of Early Adolescence, 12, 267-279.
26. Skaalvik, E. M. & Rankin, R. J. (1995). A test of the internal/external frame of reference model at different levels of math and verbal self-perception. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 161-184.
27. Tent, L. (2001). Zensuren. In D. H. Rost (Hrsg.), Handwörterbuch Pädagogische Psychologie (2. Aufl., S. 805-811). Weinheim: PVU.