Performance of (consensus) kNN QSAR for predicting estrogenic activity in a large diverse set of organic compounds

SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 19-32

  Asikainen, A H ^a   Ruuskanen, J ^a   Tuppurainen, K A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

Consensus; Estrogen receptor; kNN; QSAR; Relative binding affinity

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY; MOLECULAR GRAPHICS; NEAREST NEIGHBOR SEARCH; STRUCTURES (BUILT OBJECTS);

CONSENSUS; ESTROGEN RECEPTOR; ESTROGENIC ACTIVITIES; NOVEL METHODS; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTIVE STRUCTURES; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP MODELING; RELATIVE BINDING AFFINITY; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIPS;

BINDING ENERGY;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0842264158     PISSN: 1062936X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1062936032000169642     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Patlak, M. (1996) "A testing deadline for endocrine disrupters", Environ. Sci. Technol. 30, 540A-544A.
2. Anstead, G.M., Carlson, K.E. and Katzenellenbogen, J.A. (1997) "The estradiol pharmacophore: ligand structure-estrogen receptor binding affinity relationships and a model for the receptor binding site", Steroids 62, 268-303.
3. Fang, H., Tong, W., Shi, L.M., Blair, R., Perkins, R., Branham, W., Hass, B.S., Xien, Q., Dial, S.L., Moland, C.L. and Sheehan, D.M. (2001) "Structure-activity relationships for a large diverse set of natural, synthetic and environmental estrogens", Chem. Res. Toxicol. 14, 280-294.
4. Fang, H., Tong, W., Welsh, W.J. and Sheehan, D.M. (2003) "QSAR models in receptor-mediated effects: the nuclear receptor superfamily", J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM) 622, 113-125.
5. Waller, C.L., Minor, D.L. and McKinney, J.D. (1995) "Using three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships to examine estrogen receptor binding affinities of polychlorinated hydroxybiphenyls", Environ. Health Perspect. 103, 702-707.
6. Waller, C.L., Oprea, T.I., Chae, K., Park, H.-K., Korach, K.S., Laws, S.C., Wiese, T.E., Kelce, W.R. and Gray, L.E. (1996) "Ligand-based identification of environmental estrogens", Chem. Res. Toxicol. 9, 1240-1248.
7. Wiese, T.E., Polin, L.A., Palomino, E. and Brooks, S.C. (1997) "Induction of the estrogen specific mitogenic response of MCF-7 cells by selected analogues of estradiol-17β: A 3D QSAR Study", J. Med. Chem. 40, 3659-3669.
8. Tong, W., Perkins, R., Strelitz, R., Collantes, E.R., Keenan, S., Welsh, W.J., Branham, W.S. and Sheehan, D.M. (1997) "Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for estrogen binding to the estrogen receptor: predictions across species", Environ. Health Perspect. 105, 1116-1124.
9. Tong, W., Lowis, D.R., Perkins, R., Chen, Y., Welsh, W.J., Goddette, D.W., Heritage, T.W. and Sheehan, D.M. (1998) "Evaluation of quantitative structure-activity relationship methods for largescale prediction of chemicals binding to the estrogen receptor", J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 38, 669-677.
10. Cramer, R.D. III, Patterson, D.E. and Bunce, J.D. (1988) "Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier Proteins", J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110, 5959-5967.
11. 13C NMR spectrometric data to produce a predictive model of estrogen receptor binding activity", J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 41, 219-224.
12. Zheng, W. and Tropsha, A. (2000) "Novel variable selection quantitative stucture-property relationship approach based on the k-nearest-neighbor principle", J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 40, 185-194.
13. Manallack, D., Pitt, W., Gancia, E., Montana, J., Livingstone, D., Ford, M. and Whitley, D. (2002) "Selecting screening candidates for kinase and G protein-coupled receptor targets using neural networks", J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 42, 1256-1262.
14. Devillers, J., Domine, D., Guillon, C. and Karcher, W. (1998) "Simulating lipophilicity of organic molecules with a back-propagation neural network", J. Pharm. Sci. 87, 1086-1090.
15. Tetko, I. (2002) "Neural networks studies 4. Introduction to associative neural networks", J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 42, 717-728.
16. Tetko, I. and Tanchuk, V. (2002) "Application of associative neural networks for prediction of lipophilicity in ALOGPS 2.1 program", J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 42, 1136-1145.
17. Sutherland, J. and Weaver, D. (2003) "Development of quantitative structure-activity relationships and classification models for anticonvulsant activity of hydantoin analogues", J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 43, 1028-1036.
18. Mattioni, B., Kauffman, G. and Jurs, P. (2003) "Predicting the genotoxicity of secondary and aromatic amines using data subsetting to generate a model ensemble", J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 43, 949-963.
19. Kastenholtz, M., Pastor, M., Cruciani, G., Haaksma, E. and Fox, T. (2000) "GRID/CPCA: a new computational tool to design selective ligands", J. Med. Chem. 43, 3033-3044.
20. Tong, W., Hong, H., Fang, H., Xie, Q. and Perkins, R. (2003) "Decision forest: combining the predictions of multiple independent decision tree models", J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 43, 525-531.
21. Sussman, N., Arena, V., Yu, S., Mazumdar, S. and Thampatty, B. (2003) "Decision tree SAR models for developmental toxicity based on an FDA/TERIS database", SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 14, 83-96.
22. Dewar, M.J.S., Zoebisch, E.G., Healy, E.F. and Stewart, J.J.P. (1985) "AMI: a new general purpose quantum-mechanical molecular model", J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107, 3902-3909.
23. Todeschini, R., Consonni, V. and Pavan, M. DRAGON. Software for the calculation of molecular descriptors, version 3.0. [www: http://www.telemacus. it/talete/].
24. Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A.W., Rosenbluth, M.N., Teller, A.M. and Teller, E. (1953) "Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines", J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087-1092.
25. Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C.D., Jr. and Vecchi, M.P. (1983) "Optimization by simulated annealing", Science 220, 671-680.
26. Minka, T., LIGHTSPEED MATLAB Toolbox [www: http://www.stat.cmu.edu/ ~minka/software/ lightspeed/].
27. Tropsha, A., Gramatica, P. and Gombar, V. (2003) "The importance of being earnest: validation is the absolute essential for successful application and interpretation of QSPR models", QSAR Comb. Sci. 22, 69-76.
28. 2!", J. Mol. Graph. Model. 20, 269-276.
29. Golbraikh, A. and Tropsha, A. (2002) "Predictive QSAR modeling based on diversity sampling of experimental datasets for the training and test set selection", J. Comput. Aid. Mol. Des. 16, 357-369.
30. Coats, E. (1998) "The CoMFA steroids as a benchmark dataset for development of 3D QSAR methods", Perspect. Drug Discov. Design 12/13/14, 199-213.
31. Tuppurainen, K., Viisas, M., Laatikainen, R. and Peräkylä, M. (2002) "Evaluation of a novel electronic eigenvalue (EEVA) molecular descriptor for QSAR/QSPR studies: validation using a benchmark steroid data set", J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 42, 607-613.
32. Tetko, I., Tanchuk, V. and Villa, A. (2001) "Prediction of n-octanol/water partition coefficients from PHYSPROP database using artificial neural networks and E-state indices", J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 41, 1407-1421.
33. Tetko, I., Tanchuk, V., Kasheva, T. and Villa, A. (2001) "Estimation of aqueous solubility of chemical compounds using E-state indices", J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 41, 1488-1493.
34. Golbraikh, A. and Tropsha, A. (2003) "QSAR modeling using chirality descriptors derived from molecular topology", J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 43, 144-154.