Neural network studies. 4. Introduction to associative neural networks

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 717-728

  Tetko, Igor V ^a,b,c  

^a INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^c INSTITUTE OF HYDROBIOLOGY   (Ukraine)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATIVE NEURAL NETWORKS (ASNN);

ALGORITHMS; APPROXIMATION THEORY; CORRELATION METHODS; DATABASE SYSTEMS; DRUG PRODUCTS; NEURAL NETWORKS;

MOLECULAR DYNAMICS;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK;

NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER);

EID: 0036557849     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci010379o     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Tetko, I.V.; Tanchuk, V.Y.; Villa, A.E.P. Prediction of n-Octanol/ Water Partition Coefficients from PHYSPROP Database Using Artificial Neural Networks and E-state Indices. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 1407-1421.
2. Gombar, V.K. Reliable assessment of logP of compounds of pharmaceutical relevance. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 1999, 10, 371-380.
3. Leo, A.J.; Hoekman, D. Calculating log P(oct) with no Missing Fragments; The problem of Estimating New Interaction Parameters. Persp. Drug Discov. and Design 2000, 18, 19-38.
4. Meylan, W.M.; Howard, P.H. Atom/fragment contribution method for estimating octanol-water partition coefficients. J. Pharm. Sci. 1995, 84, 83-92.
5. Petrauskas, A.A.; Kolovanov, E.A. ACD/LogP Method Description. Persp. Drug Discov. Design 2000, 19, 1-19.
6. Wang, R.; Gao, Y.; Lai, L. Calculating Partition Coefficient by Atom-Additive Method. Persp. Drug Discov. Design 2000, 19, 47-66.
7. Ghose, A.K.; Viswanadhan, V.N.; Wendoloski, J.J. Prediction of hydrophobic (lipophilic) properties of small organic molecules using fragmental methods - an analysis of ALOGP and CLOGP methods. J. Phys. Chem. 1998, 102, 3762-3772.
8. BioByte Corp., 201 W. Fourth Street, Claremont, CA.
9. Syracuse Research Corporation. Physical/Chemical Property Database (PHYSPROP); SRC Environmental Science Center: Syracuse, NY.
10. ACD/LogP Prediction Software. An Overview and Comparison; ACD, Inc.: 133 Richmond St. W., Suite 605, Toronto ON M5H 2L3, Canada, 2001.
11. Zupan, J.; Gasteiger, J. Neural Networks for Chemistry and Drug Design: An Introduction; 2nd ed.; VCH: Weinheim, 1999.
12. Tetko, I.V. Associative Neural Network. Neur. Proc. Lett. 2001, submitted for publication.
13. Tetko, I.V. Associative Neural Network, CogPrints Archive, cog00001441, available as http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/documents/ disk0/00/00/14/41/index.html, 2001.
14. Kier, L.B.; Hall, L.H. An electrotopological-state index for atoms in molecules. Pharm. Res. 1990, 7, 801-807.
15. Hall, L.H.; Kier, L.B. Electrotopological state indices for atom types - a novel combination of electronic, topological, and valence state information. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1995, 35, 1039-1045.
16. Kier, L.B.; Hall, L.H. Molecular Structure Description: The Electrotopological State; Academic Press: London, 1999.
17. Kurogi, Y.; Inoue, Y.; Tsutsumi, K.; Nakamura, S.; Nagao, K.; Yoshitsugu, H.; Tsuda, Y. Synthesis and hypolipidemic activities of novel 2-[4-[diethoxyphosphoryl)methyl]phenyl]quinazolines and 4(3H)-quinazolinones. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 1433-1437.
18. Dasarthy, B. Nearest Neighbor (NN) Norms; IEEE Computer Society Press: Washington, DC, 1991.
19. Härdle, W. Smoothing Techniques with Implementation in S; Springer-Verlag: New York, 1990.
20. Lawrence, S.; Tsoi, A.C.; Back, A.D. Function Approximation with Neural Networks and Local Methods: Bias, Variance and Smoothness. Australian Conference on Neural Networks; Australian National University: Australian National University, 1996; pp 16-21.
21. Geman, S.; Bienenstock, E.; Doursat, R. Neural Networks and the Bias/Variance Dilemma. Neural Computation 1992, 4, 1-58.
22. Tetko, I.V.; Villa, A.E.P. Efficient Partition of Learning Data Sets for Neural Network Training. Neural Networks 1997, 10, 1361-1374.
23. Tetko, I.V.; Villa, A.E.P. Unsupervised and Supervised Learning: Cooperation toward a Common Goal. ICANN'95, International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks NEURONIMES'95; EC2 & Cie: Paris, France, 1995; pp 105-110.
24. Press: W.H.; Teukolsky, S.A.; Vetterling, W.T.; Flannery, B.P. Numerical Recipes in C, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: New York, 1994; p 998.
25. Tetko, I.V.; Tanchuk, V.Y. Application of Associative Neural Networks for Prediction of Lipophilicity in ALOGPS 2.1 program. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, submitted for publication.
26. Tetko, I.V.; Livingstone, D.J.; Luik, A.I. Neural network studies. I. Comparison of overfitting and overtraining. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1995, 35, 826-833.
27. Bishop, M. Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition; Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1995.
28. Xue, L.; Bajorath, J. Molecular descriptors in chemoinformatics, computational combinatorial chemistry, and virtual screening. Comb. Chem. High. Throughput Screen. 2000, 3, 363-372.
29. Keseru, G.M.; Molnar, L.; Greiner, I. A neural network based virtual high throughput screening test for the prediction of CNS activity. Comb. Chem. High. Throughput Screen. 2000, 3, 535-540.
30. Oprea, T.I.; Davis, A.M.; Teague, S.J.; Leeson, P.D. Is There a Difference between Leads and Drugs? A Historical Perspective. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 1308-1315.
31. Sadowski, J.; Kubinyi, H. A scoring scheme for discriminating between drugs and nondrugs. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 3325-3329.
32. Ajay, A.; Walters, W.P.; Murcko, M.A. Can we learn to distinguish between "drug-like" and "nondrug-like" molecules? J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 3314-3324.
33. Shepherd, A.J. Second-Order Methods for Neural Networks; Springer-Verlag: London, 1997; p 145.
34. Mitchell, M. An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1996.
35. Tetko, I.V.; Tanchuk, V.Y.; Vasil'ev, S.A.; Khil'ya, V.P.; Poda, G.I.; Luik, A.I. Evolutionary computation for revealing structure-activity relationships in 3-phenoxychromone and 3-phenoxy-4-hydroxycoumarin derivatives. Bioorg. Khim. 1995, 21, 809-815.
36. Ivakhnenko, A.G.; Ivakhnenko, G.A. Problems of Further Development of the Group Method of Data Handling Algorithms. Part I. Pat. Recog. Imag. Anal. 2000, 10, 187-194.
37. Tetko, I.V.; Aksenova, T.I.; Volkovich, V.V.; Kasheva, T.N.; Filipov, D.V.; Welsh, W.J.; Livingstone, D.J.; Villa, A.E.P. Polynomial neural network for linear and nonlinear model selection in quantitative-structure activity relationship studies on the Internet. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 2000, 11, 263-280.
38. Ivakhnenko, A.G.; Ivakhnenko, G.A. Self-Organization of Neural Networks with Active Neurons. Pat. Recog. Imag. Anal. 1994, 4, 185-196.
39. Tetko, I.V.; Kovalishyn, V.V.; Livingstone, D.J. Volume learning algorithm artificial neural networks for 3D QSAR studies. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 2411-2420.
40. Kovalishyn, V.V.; Tetko, I.V.; Luik, A.I.; Chretien, J.R.; Livingstone, D.J. Application of Neural Networks Using the Volume Learning Algorithm for Quantitative Study of the Three-Dimensional Structure-Activity Relationships of Chemical Compounds. Bioorg. Khim. 2001, 27, 267-277.