Evaluation of quantitative structure-activity relationship methods for large-scale prediction of chemicals binding to the estrogen receptor †

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 669-677

  Tong, Weida ^a   Lowis, David R ^c   Perkins, Roger ^a   Chen, Yu ^a   Welsh, William J ^b   Goddette, Dean W ^c   Heritage, Trevor W ^c   Sheehan, Daniel M ^d  

^a Logicon ROW Sciences   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

^c TRIPOS INC   (United States)

^d NATIONAL CENTER FOR TOXICOLOGICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ESTRADIOL DERIVATIVE; ESTROGEN RECEPTOR; XENOBIOTIC AGENT;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG SCREENING; EVALUATION; HUMAN; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; STATISTICS; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

ANIMALS; DRUG EVALUATION, PRECLINICAL; ESTRADIOL CONGENERS; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; RECEPTORS, ESTROGEN; SOFTWARE; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; XENOBIOTICS;

EID: 0032109698     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci980008g     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Kavlock, R. J.; Daston, G. P.; DeRosa, C.; Fenner-Crisp, P.; Gray, L. E.; Kaattari, S.; Lucier, G.; Luster, M.; Mac, M. J.; Maczka, C.; Miller, R.; Moore, J.; Rolland, R.; Scott, G.; Sheehan, D. M.; Sinks, T.; Tilson, H. A. Research needs for the risk assessment of health and environmental effects of endocrine disrupters: A report of the U.S. EPA-sponsored workshop. Environ. Health Perspect. 1996, 104, 715-740.
2. Compilation of Laws Enforced by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Related Statutes; Vol. 2; U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, D.C., 1996.
3. Safe Drinking Water Act Amendment of 1996, Public Law 104-182, 104th Congress, 1996.
4. Patlak, M. A testing deadline for endocrine disrupters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1996, 30, 540A-544A.
5. Warr, W. Combinatorial chemistry and molecular diversity. An Overview. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 134-140.
6. Broach, J. R.; Thorner, J. High throughput screening for drug discovery. Nature 1996, 384(Supp), 14-16.
7. Katzenellenbogen, J. A. The structural pervasiveness of estrogenic activity. Environ. Health Perspect. 1995, 103, 99-101.
8. Anstead, G. M.; Carlson, K. E.; Katzenellenbogen, J. A. The estradiol pharmacophore: ligand structure-estrogen receptor binding affinity relationships and a model for the receptor binding site. Steroids 1997, 62, 268-303.
9. Tong, W.; Perkins, R.; Strelitz, R.; Collantes, E. R.; Keenan, S.; Welsh, W. J.; Branham, W. S; Sheehan, D. M. Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for estrogen binding to estrogen receptor: Predictions across species. Environ. Health Perspect. 1997, 105(10), 1116-1124.
10. Tong, W.; Perkins, R.; Xing, L.; Welsh, W. J.; Sheehan, D. M. QSAR models for binding of estrogenic compounds to estrogen receptor α and β subtypes. Endocrinology 1997, 138, 4022-4025.
11. Waller, C. L.; Minor, D. L.; Mckinney, J. D. Examination of the estrogen-receptor binding affinities of polychlorinated hydroxybiphenyls using three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships. Environ. Health Perspect. 1995, 103, 702-707.
12. Bradbury, S. P.; Mekenyan, O. G.; Ankley, G. T. Quantitative structure-activity relationships for polychlorinated hydroxybiphenyl estrogen receptor binding affinity - An assessment of conformer flexibility. Environ. Tox. Chem. 1996, 15, 1945-1954.
13. Gantchev, T. G.; Ali, H.; van Lier, J. E. Quantitative structure-activity relationships/comparative molecular field analysis (QSARs/CoMFA) for receptor-binding properties of halogenated estradiol derivatives. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 4164-4176.
14. Waller, C. L.; Oprea, T. I.; Chae, K.; Park, H. K.; Korach, K. S.; Laws, S. C.; Wiese, T. E.; Kelce, W. R.; Gray, L. E. Ligand-based identification of environmental estrogens. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1996, 9, 1240-1248.
15. Cramer, R., III; Patterson, D. E.; Bunce, J. D. Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5959-5967.
16. Collantes, E.; Tong, W.; Welsh, W. J. Use of moment of inertia in comparative molecular field analysis to model chromatographic retention of nonpolar solutes. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 2038-2043.
17. Tong, W.; Collantes, E. R.; Welsh, W. J.; Berglund, B.; Howlett, A. Derivation of a pharmacophore model for anandamide using constrained conformational searching and comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). J. Med. Chem., in press.
18. Welsh, W. J.; Tong, W.; Collantes, E. R. Heats of sublimition and formation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) derived from comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA): Application of moment of inertia for molecular alignment. Thermochim. Acta 1996, 290, 55-64.
19. Tong, W.; Collantes, E. R.; Chen, Y.; Welsh, W. J. A comparative molecular field analysis study of N-benzylpiperidines as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 380-387.
20. HQSAR is a product of Tripos, Inc., St. Louis, MO 63144.
21. James, C. A.; Weininger, D. Daylight Theory Manual; Daylight Chemical Information Systems, Inc.: 27401 Los Altos, Suite #370, Mission Viejo, CA 92691.
22. Turner, D. B.; Tyrrell, S. M; Willett, P. Rapid quantification of molecular diversity for selective database acquisition. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 18-22.
23. Rosenkranz, H. S.; Cunningham, A.; Klopman, G. Identification of a 2-D geometric descriptor associated with non-genotoxic carcinogens and some estrogens and antiestrogens. Mutagenesis 1996, 11, 95-100.
24. CODESSA is a product of Semichem, 7128 Summit, Shawnee, KS 66216.
25. Kuiper, G. G. J. M.; Carlsson, B.; Grandien, K.; Enmark, E.; Haggblad, J.; Nilsson, S.; Gustafsson, J-Å. Comparison of the ligand binding specificity and transcript tissue distribution of estrogen receptors α and β. Endocrinology 1997, 138, 863-870.
26. von Angerer, E.; Prekajac, J.; Strohmeier, J. 2-Phenylindoles. Relationship between structure, estrogen receptor affinity, and mammary tumor inhibiting activity in the rat. J. Med. Chem. 1984, 27, 1439-1447.
27. Polossek, T.; Ambros, R.; von Angerer, S.; Brandl, G.; Mannschreck, A.; van Angerer, E. 6-Alkyl-12-formylindolo[2,1-a]isoquinolines. Synthesis, estrogen receptor binding affinities, and stereospecific cytostatic activity. J. Med. Chem. 1992, 35, 3537-3547.
28. von Angerer, E.; Biberger, C.; Holler, E.; Koop, R.; Leichtl, S. 1-Carbamoylalkyl-2-phenylindoles: relationship between side chain structure and estrogen antagonism. J. Steroid Biochem. Molec. Biol. 1994, 49, 51-62.
29. InfoMetrix, Inc., P. O. Box 1528, Woodinville, Washington 98027.
30. Cramer, R. D., III Partial least square (PLS): Its strengths and limitations. Perspect. Drug Dis. Design 1993, 1, 269-278.
31. Livingstone, D. Data analysis for chemists - applications to QSAR and chemical product design; Oxford University. Oxford, New York, 1995.
32. Ash, S.; Cline, M.; Homer, R. W.; Hurst, T.; Smith, G. B. SYBYL Line Notation (SLN): A versatile language for chemical structure representation. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 71-79.
33. Knuth, D. E. Sorting and searching; Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.
34. Cramer, R. D., III; Bunce, J. D.; Patterson, D. E. Crossvalidation, bootstrapping, and partial least squares compared with multiple regression in conventional QSAR studies. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1988, 7, 18-25.
35. Apex-3D 95.0 User Guide, Biosym/MSI, 9685 Scranton Road, San Diego, CA 92121.
36. Hasegawa, K.; Miyashita, Y.; Funatsu, K. GA strategy for variable selection in QSAR studies: GA-based PLS analysis of calcium channel antagonists. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 306-310.
37. Kubinyi, H. Evolutionary variable selection in regression and PLS analysis. J. Chemometr. 1996, 10, 119-133.
38. So, S-S; Karplus, M. Evolutionary optimization in quantitative structure-activity relationship: an application of genetic neural networks. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 1521-1530.
39. Brown, R. D.; Martin, Y. C. Use of structure-activity data to compare structure-based clustering methods and descriptors for use in compound selection. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 572-584.