Sorting GPI-anchored proteins

Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 110-120

  Mayor, Satyajit ^a   Riezman, Howard ^b  

^a TATA INSTITUTE OF FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL TOXIN; CLATHRIN; GLYCOSYLPHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL; GUANOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; HYBRID PROTEIN; LIPID; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; N ETHYLMALEIMIDE; PROTEIN; PROTEIN CDC42; RAS PROTEIN; RHO FACTOR; SNARE PROTEIN;

CELL MEMBRANE; CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE; DROSOPHILA; ENDOCYTOSIS; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM; FLUORESCENCE RESONANCE ENERGY TRANSFER; GOLGI COMPLEX; MEMBRANE TRANSPORT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN TARGETING; REVIEW; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TRYPANOSOMA BRUCEI;

DYNAMINS; ENDOCYTOSIS; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM; GLYCOSYLPHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOLS; GOLGI APPARATUS; LIPID METABOLISM; LIPIDS; MEMBRANE MICRODOMAINS; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; PROTEINS;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TRYPANOSOMA; TRYPANOSOMA BRUCEI;

EID: 0742305877     PISSN: 14710072     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrm1309     Document Type: Review

References (110)

1. Mann, R. K. & Beachy, P. A. Cholesterol modification of proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1529, 188-202 (2000).
2. Prior, I. A. et al. GTP-dependent segregation of H-ras from lipid rafts is required for biological activity. Nature Cell Biol. 3, 368-375 (2001).
3. Eisenhaber, B., Bork, P. & Eisenhaber, P. Post-translational GPI lipid anchor modification of proteins in kingdoms of life: analysis of protein sequence data from complete genomes. Protein Eng. 14, 17-25 (2001).
4. Ferguson, M. A. The structure, biosynthesis and functions of glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchors, and the contributions of trypanosome research. J. Cell Sci. 112, 2799-2809 (1999).
5. Ikezawa, H. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 25, 409-417 (2002).
6. Masterson, W. J., Raper, J., Doering, T. L., Hart, G. W. & Englund, P. T. Fatty acid remodeling: a novel reaction sequence in the biosynthesis of trypanosome glycosyl phosphatioylinositol membrane anchors. Cell 62, 73-80 (1990).
7. Doering, T. L. et al. Toxicity of myristic acid analogs toward African trypanosomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 9735-9739 (1994).
8. Conzelmann, A., Puoti, A., Lester, R. L. & Desponds, C. Two different types of lipid moieties are present in glycophosphoinositol-anchored membrane proteins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 11, 457-466 (1992).
9. Fankhauser, C, et al. Structures of glycosylphosphatidylinositol membrane anchors from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 26365-26374 (1993).
10. Haynes, P. A., Gooley, A. A., Ferguson, M. A., Redmond, J. W. & Williams, K. L. Post-translational modifications of the Dictyostelium discoideum glycoprotein PsA. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol membrane anchor and composition of O-linked oligosaccharides. Eur. J. Biochem. 216, 729-737 (1993).
11. Ferguson, M. A. et al. Glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol molecules of the parasite and the host. Parasitology 108, S45-S54 (1994).
12. Rudd, P. M., Wormald, M. R., Wing, D. R., Prusiner, S. B. & Dwek, R. A. Prion glycoprotein: structure, dynamics, and roles for the sugars. Biochemistry 40, 3759-3766 (2001).
13. Leidich, S. D., Drapp, D. A. & Orlean, P. A conditionally lethal yeast mutant blocked at the first step in glycosyl phosphatidylinositol anchor synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 10193-10196 (1994).
14. Brul, S. et al. The incorporation of mannoproteins in the cell wall of S. cerevisiae and filamentous Ascomycetes. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 72, 229-237 (1997).
15. Kawagoe, K. et al. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchor-deficient mice: implications for clonal dominance of mutant cells in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. Blood 87, 3600-3606 (1996).
16. Takeda, J. et al. Deficiency of the GPI anchor caused by a somatic mutation of the PIG-A gene in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. Cell 73, 703-711 (1993).
17. Inoue, N., Murakami, Y. & Kinoshita, T. Molecular genetics of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. Int. J. Hematol. 77, 107-112 (2003).
18. Baron, G. S. & Caughey, B. Effect of glycosylphosphatioylinositol anchor-dependent and-independent prion protein association with model raft membranes on conversion to the protease-resistant isoform. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 14883-14892 (2003).
19. Kirchhausen, T., Bonifacino, J. S. & Riezman, H. Linking cargo to vesicle formation: receptor tail interactions with coat proteins. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 488-495 (1997).
20. Mellman, I. Membranes and sorting. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8, 497-498 (1996).
21. Brown, D. GPI-anchored proteins and detergent-resistant membrane domains. Braz. J. Med. Biol Res. 27, 309-315 (1994).
22. Brown, D. A. & Rose, J. K. Sorting of GPI-anchored proteins to glycolipid-enriched membrane subdomains during transport to the apical cell surface, Cell 68, 533-544 (1992). The first study to correlate the ability of GPI-anchored proteins to associate with microdomains (more specifically, DRMs) with the apical sorting property of GPI anchoring.
23. Simons, K. & Ikonen, E. Functional rafts in cell membranes. Nature 387, 569-572 (1997).
24. Chatterjee, S. & Mayor, S. The GPI-anchor and protein sorting. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 58, 1969-1987 (2001).
25. Sharma, P., Sabharaniak, S. & Mayor, S. Endocytosis of lipid rafts: an identity crisis. Semin. Cell. Dev. Biol. 13, 205-214 (2002).
26. Zurzolo, C., van Meer, G. & Mayor, S. The order of rafts. EMBO Rep. 4, 1117-1121 (2003).
27. Kenworthy, A. K. & Edidin, M. Distribution of a glycosylphosphatioylinositol-anchored protein at the apical surface of MDCK cells examined at a resolution of 100 A using imaging fluorescence resonance energy transfer. J. Cell Biol. 142, 69-84 (1998).
28. Kenworthy A. K., Petranova, N. & Edidin, M. High-resolution FRET microscopy of cholera toxin B-subunit and GPI-anchored proteins in cell plasma membranes. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 1645-1655 (2000).
29. Varma, R. & Mayor, S. GPI-anchored proteins are organized in submicron domains at the cell surface. Nature 394, 798-801 (1998).
30. Jacobson, K. & Dietrich, C. Looking at lipid rafts? Trends Cell Biol. 9, 87-91 (1999).
31. Friedrichson, T. & Kurzchalia, T. V. Microdomains of GPI-anchored proteins in living cells revealed by crosslinking. Nature 394, 802-805 (1998).
32. Edidin, M. Lipids on the frontier: a century of cell-membrane bilayers. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 414-418 (2003).
33. Nuoffer, C., Horvath, A. & Riezman, H. Analysis of the sequence requirements for glycosylphosphatioylinositol anchoring of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Gas1 protein. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 10558-10563 (1993).
34. Moran, P., Raab, H., Kohr, W. J. & Caras, I. W. Glycophospholipid membrane anchor attachment. Molecular analysis of the cleavage/attachment site. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 1250-1257 (1991).
35. Udenfriend, S., Micanovic, R. & Kodukula, K. Structural requirements of a nascent protein for processing to a PI-G anchored form: studies in intact cells and cell-free systems. Cell Biol. Int. Rep. 15, 739-759 (1991).
36. Doering, T. L. & Schekman, R. GPI anchor attachment is required for Gas1 p transport from the endoplasmic reticulum in COPII vesicles. EMBO J. 15, 182-191 (1996).
37. Ellgaard, L. & Helenius, A. Quality control in the endoplasmic reticulum. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 181-191 (2003).
38. McDowell, M. A., Ransom, D. M. & Bangs, J. D. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-dependent secretory transport in Trypanosoma brucei. Biochem. J. 335, 681-689 (1998). Provides evidence that GPI anchors could be a signal for efficient transport of proteins from the ER to the Golgi compartment.
39. Butikofer, P., Malherbe, T., Boschung, M. & Roditi, I. GPI-anchored proteins: now you see'em, now you don't. FASEB J. 15, 545-548 (2001). Contains the surprising finding that, at least in some cases, the protein structure of GPI-anchored proteins is highly dependent on the presence of the GPI anchor.
40. Muniz, M., Morsomme, P. & Riezman, H. Protein sorting upon exit from the endoplasmic reticulum. Cell 104, 313-320 (2001). Provides the first evidence that cargo proteins, including GPI-anchored proteins, can exit the ER in at least two vesicle populations.
41. Cao, X., Ballew, N. & Barlowe, C. Initial docking of ER-derived vesicles requires Uso1p and Ypt1 p but is independent of SNARE proteins. EMBO J. 17, 2156-2165 (1998).
42. VanRheenen, S. M. et al. Sec34p, a protein required for vesicle tethering to the yeast Golgi apparatus, is in a complex with Sec35p. J. Cell Biol. 147, 729-742 (1999).
43. Whyte, J. R. & Munro, S. The Sec34/35 Golgi transport complex is related to the exocyst, defining a family of complexes involved in multiple steps of membrane traffic. Dev. Cell 1, 527-537 (2001).
44. Barrowman, J., Sacher, M. & Ferro-Novick, S. TRAPP stably associates with the Golgi and is required for vesicle docking. EMBO J. 19, 862-869 (2000).
45. Allan, B. B., Moyer, B. D. & Balch, W. E. Rab1 recruitment of p115 into a cis-SNARE complex: programming budding COPII vesicles for fusion. Science 289, 444-448 (2000).
46. Waters, M. G., Clary, D. O. & Rothman, J. E. A novel 115-kD peripheral membrane protein is required for intercisternal transport in the Golgi stack. J. Cell Biol. 118, 1015-1026 (1992).
47. Sapperstein, S. K., Walter, D. M., Grosvenor, A. R., Heuser, J. E. & Waters, M. G. p115 is a general vesicular transport factor related to the yeast endoplasmic reticulum to Golgi transport factor Uso1p. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 522-526 (1995).
48. Sacher, M. et al. TRAPP, a highly conserved novel complex on the cis-Golgi that mediates vesicle docking and fusion. EMBO J. 17, 2494-2503 (1998).
49. Morsomme, P. & Riezman, H. The Rab GTPase Ypt1p and tethering factors couple protein sorting at the ER to vesicle targeting to the Golgi apparatus. Dev. Cell 2, 307-317 (2002). Provides evidence that factors involved in tethering of ER-derived vesicles to the Golgi compartment have an additional function in cargo-protein sorting on exit from the ER.
50. Muniz, M., Nuoffer, C., Hauri, H. P. & Riezman, H. The Emp24 complex recruits a specific cargo molecule into endoplasmic reticulum-derived vesicles. J. Cell Biol. 148, 925-930 (2000).
51. Friedmann, E., Salzberg, Y., Weinberger, A., Shaltiel, S. & Gerst, J. E. YOS9, the putative yeast homolog of a gene amplified in osteosarcomas, is involved in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-Golgi transport of GPI-anchored proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 35274-35281 (2002).
52. Belden, W. J. & Barlowe, C. Role of Erv29p in collecting soluble secretory proteins into ER-derived transport vesicles. Science 294, 1528-1531 (2001). Identifies conclusively a transmembrane protein that acts to concentrate a lumenal cargo protein into vesicles formed on the ER membrane.
53. Miller, E., Antonny, B., Hamamoto, S. & Schekman, R. Cargo selection into COPII vesicles is driven by the Sec24p subunit. EMBO J. 21, 6105-6113 (2002).
54. Malkus, P., Jiang, F. & Schekman, R. Concentrative sorting of secretory cargo proteins into COPII-coated vesicles. J. Cell Biol. 159, 915-921 (2002).
55. Morsomme, P., Prescianotto-Baschong, C. & Riezman, H. The ER v-SNAREs are required for GPI-anchored protein sorting from other secretory proteins upon exit from the ER. J. Cell Biol. 162, 403-412 (2003).
56. Lisanti, M. P., Caras, I. W., Davitz, M. A. & Rodriguez-Boulan, E. A glycophospholipid membrane anchor acts as an apical targeting signal in polarized epithelial cells. J. Cell Biol. 109, 2145-2156 (1989).
57. Brown, D. A., Crise, B. & Rose, J. K. Mechanism of membrane anchoring affects polarized expression of two proteins in MDCK cells. Science 245, 1499-1501 (1989).
58. Benting, J. H., Rietveld, A. G. & Simons, K. N-Glycans mediate the apical sorting of a GPI-anchored, raft-associated protein in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. J. Cell Biol. 148, 313-320 (1999).
59. Lipardi, C., Nitsch, L. & Zurzolo, C. Detergent-insoluble GPI-anchored proteins are apically sorted in fischer rat thyroid cells, but interference with cholesterol or sphingolipids differentially affects detergent insolubility and apical sorting. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 531-542 (2000).
60. Rodriguez-Boulan, E. & Gonzalez, A. Glycans in post-Golgi apical targeting: sorting signals or structural props? Trends Cell Biol. 9, 291-294 (1999).
61. Cheong, K. H., Zacchetti, D., Schneeberger, E. E. & Simons, K. VIP 17/MAL, a lipid raft-associated protein, is involved in apical transport in MDCK cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 6241-6248 (1999).
62. Martin-Belmonte, P., Puertollano, R., Millan, J. & Alonso, M. A. The MAL proteolipid is necessary for the overall apical delivery of membrane proteins in the polarized epithelial Madin-Darby canine kidney and fischer rat thyroid cell lines. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 2033-2045 (2000).
63. Millan, J. & Alonso, M. A. MAL, a novel integral membrane protein of human T lymphocytes, associates with glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins and Src-like tyrosine kinases. Eur J. Immunol. 28, 3675-3684 (1998).
64. Conner, S. D. & Schmid, S. L. Regulated portals of entry into the cell. Nature 422, 37-44 (2003).
65. McNiven, M. A., Cao, H., Pitts, K. R. & Yoon, Y. The dynamin family of mechancenzymes: pinching in new places. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25, 115-120 (2000).
66. Maxfield, F. R. & Mayor, S. Cell surface dynamics of GPI-anchored proteins. Adv Exp. Med. Biol. 419, 355-364 (1997).
67. Rijnboutt, S. et al. Endocytosis of GPI-linked membrane folate receptor-α. J. Cell Biol. 132, 35-47 (1996).
68. Mayor, S., Sabharanjak, S. & Maxfield, F. R. Cholesterol-dependent retention of GPI-anchored proteins in endosomes. EMBO J. 17, 4626-4638 (1998).
69. Chatterjee, S., Smith, E. R., Hanada, K., Stevens, V. L. & Mayor, S. GPI anchoring leads to sphingolipid-dependent retention of endocytosed proteins in the recycling endosomal compartment. EMBO J. 20, 1583-1592 (2001). Together, references 68 and 69 show that sorting of GPI-anchored proteins in endosomes of mammalian cells is dependent on cholesterol and sphingolipid concentrations in cells, consistent with the role of cholesterol- and sphingolipid-enriched microdomains in trafficking.
70. Sabharanjak, S., Sharma, P., Parton, R. & Mayor, S. GPI-anchored proteins are delivered to the endosomal recycling compartment via a distinct cdc42-regulated, clathrin-independent pinocytic pathway. Dev Cell 2, 411-423 (2002). Identifies a distinct dynamin-independent endocytic pathway that is responsible for the internallization of GPI-anchored proteins, and also shows that this route accounts for a significant fraction of fluid-phase uptake.
71. Firvaz, M. et al. Differential sorting and fate of endocytosed GPI-anchored proteins. EMBO J. 21,3989-4000 (2002). Provides evidence for the plasticity of GEEC targeting and indicates that the time of association of GPI-anchored proteins with microdomains might also be important for their final destination inside the endosomal system.
72. Anderson, R. G. The caveolae membrane system. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 199-225 (1998).
73. Parton, R. G., Joggerst, B. & Simons, K. Regulated internalization of caveolae. J. Cell Biol. 127, 1199-1215 (1994).
74. Fujimoto, T. GPI-anchored proteins, glycosphingolipids, and sphingomyelin are sequestered to caveolae only after crosslinking. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 44, 929-941 (1996).
75. Mayor, S., Rothberg, K. G. & Maxfield, F. R. Sequestration of GPI-anchored proteins in caveolae triggered by cross-linking. Science 264, 1948-1951 (1994).
76. Deckert, M., Ticchioni, M. & Bernard, A. Endocytosis of GPI-anchored proteins in human lymphocytes: role of glycolipid-based domains, actin cytoskeleton, and protein kinases. J. Cell Biol. 133, 791-799 (1996).
77. Pauly, P. C. & Harris, D. A. Copper stimulates endocytosis of the prion protein. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 33107-33110 (1998).
78. Sunyach, C. et al. The mechanism of internalization of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored prion protein EMBO J. 22, 3591-3601 (2003).
79. Conese, M. et al. α2 Macroglobulin receptor/Ldl receptor-related protein (Lrp)-dependent internalization of the urokinase receptor J. Cell Biol. 131, 1609-1622 (1995).
80. Nykjaer, A. et al. Purified α2-macroglobulin receptor/LDL receptor-related protein binds urokinase•plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 complex. Evidence that the α2-macroglobulin receptor mediates cellular degradation of urokinase receptor-bound complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 14543-14546 (1992).
81. Poussin, C., Foti, M., Carpentier, J. L. & Pugin, J. CD14-dependent endotoxin internalization via a macropinocytic pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 20285-20291 (1998).
82. Triantafilou, K., Triantafilou, M. & Dedrick, R. L. A CD14-independent LPS receptor cluster. Nature Immunol. 2, 338-345 (2001).
83. Nabi, I. R. & Le, P. U. Caveolae/raft-dependent endocytosis. J. Cell Biol. 161, 673-677 (2003).
84. Guha, A., Sriram, V., Krishnan, K. S. & Mayor, S. shibire mutations reveal distinct dynamin-independent and dependent endocytic pathways in primary cultures of Drosophila hemocytes. J. Cell Sci. 116, 3373-3386 (2003).
85. Skretting, G., Torgersen, M. L., van Deurs, B. & Sandvig, K. Endocytic mechanisms responsible for uptake of GPI-linked diphtheria toxin receptor. J. Cell Sci. 112, 3899-3909 (1999).
86. Ricci, V. et al. High cell sensitivity to Helicobacter pylori VacA toxin depends on a GPI-anchored protein and is not blocked by inhibition of the clathrin-mediated pathway of endocytosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 3897-3909 (2000).
87. Puri, V. et al. Clathrin-dependent and-independent internalization of plasma membrane sphingolipids initiates two Golgi targeting pathways. J. Cell Biol. 154, 535-547 (2001).
88. Pal, A., Hall, B. S., Nesbeth, D. N., Field, H. I. & Field, M. C. Differential endocytic functions of Trypanosoma brucei Rab5 isoforms reveal a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-specific endosomal pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 9529-9539 (2002).
89. Nichols, B. J. t al. Rapid cycling of lipid raft markers between the cell surface and Golgi complex. J. Cell Biol. 153, 529-541 (2001).
90. Kamen, B. A., Wang, M. T., Streckfuss, A. J., Peryea, X. & Anderson, R. G. Delivery of folates to the cytoplasm of MA104 cells is mediated by a surface membrane receptor that recycles. J. Biol. Chem. 263, 13602-13609 (1988).
91. Horvath, A., Sutterlin, C., Manning-Krieg, U., Mowa, N. R. & Riezman, H. Ceramide synthesis enhances transport of GPI-anchored proteins to the Golgi apparatus in yeast. EMBO J. 13, 3687-3695 (1994).
92. Watanabe, R., Funato, K., Venkataraman, K., Futerman, A. H. & Riezman, H. Sphingolipids are required for the stable membrane association of glycosylphosphaticlylinositol-anchored proteins in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 49538-49544 (2002).
93. Bagnat, M., Keranen, S., Shevchenko, A. & Simons, K. Lipid rafts function in biosynthetic delivery of proteins to the cell surface in yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 3254-3259 (2000).
94. Heese-Peck, A. et al. Multiple functions of sterols in yeast endocytosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 2664-2680 (2002).
95. Sievi, E., Suntio, T. & Makarow, M. Proteolytic function of GPI-anchored plasma membrane protease Yps1p in the yeast vacuole and Golgi. Traffic 2, 896-907 (2001).
96. Bagnat, M. & Simons, K. Lipid rafts in protein sorting and cell polarity in budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biol. Chem. 383, 1475-1480 (2002).
97. Esfahani, M. et al. Cholesterol regulates the cell surface expression of glycophospholipid-anchored CD14 antigen on human monocytes. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 1149, 217-223 (1993).
98. Hannan, L. A. & Edidin, M. Traffic, polarity and detergent solubility of a glycosylphosphatiaylinositol-anchored protein after LDL-deprivation of MDCK cells. J. Cell Biol. 133, 1265-1276 (1996).
99. Ledesma, M. D., Simons, K. & Dotti, C. G. Neuronal polarity: essential role of protein-lipid complexes in axonal sorting. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 3966-3971 (1998).
100. McNew, J. A. et al. Compartmental specificity of cellular membrane fusion encoded in SNARE proteins. Nature 407, 153-159 (2000).
101. Lian, J. P., Stone, S., Jiang, Y., Lyons, P. & Ferro-Novick, S. Ypt1 p implicated in v-SNARE activation. Nature 372, 698-701 (1994).
102. Sapperstein, S. K., Lupashin, V. V., Schmitt, H. D. & Waters, M. G. Assembly of the ER to Golgi SNARE complex requires Uso1p. J. Cell Biol. 132, 755-767 (1996).
103. Pfeffer, S. Membrane domains in the secretory and endocytic pathways. Cell 112, 507-517 (2003).
104. Lamaze, C. et al. Interleukin 2 receptors and detergent-resistant membrane domains define a clathrin-independent endocytic pathway. Mol. Cell 7, 661-671 (2001).
105. Edidin, M. The state of lipid rafts: from model membranes to cells. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 32, 257-283 (2003).
106. McConnell, H. M. & Vrljic, M. Liquid-liquid immiscibility in membranes. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 32, 469-492 (2003).
107. Brown, D. A. & London, E. Functions of lipid rafts in biological membranes. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 14, 111-136 (1998).
108. Anderson, R. G. & Jacobson, K. A role for lipid shells in targeting proteins to caveolae, rafts, and other lipid domains. Science 296, 1821-1825 (2002).
109. Heerklotz, H. Triton promotes domain formation in lipid raft mixtures. Biophys. J. 83, 2693-2701 (2002).
110. Heerklotz, H., Szadkowska, H., Anderson, T. & Seelig, J. The sensitivity of lipid domains to small perturbations demonstrated by the effect of Triton. J. Mol. Biol. 329, 793-799 (2003).