Derivation of psychological functions;Derivación de funciones psicológicas

Psicothema

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 700-707

  Luciano Soriano, M Carmen ^a   Martín, Serafín Gómez ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALMERÍA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347751159     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Baer, D.M., Peterson, R.F., y Sherman, J.A. (1967). The development of imitation by reinforcing behavioral similarity to a model. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 10, 405-416.
2. Barnes, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44, 91-124.
3. Barnes, D., Browne, M., Smeets, P.M & Roche, B. (1995). A transfer of functions and a conditional transfer of functions through equivalence relations in three-to six-year old children. The Psychological Record, 45, 405-430.
4. Barnes-Holmes, D., Stewart, I., Dymond, S., y Roche, B. (2000). A behavior-analytic approach to some of the problems of the self: A relational frame analysis. En M.J. Dougher (Ed), Clinical Behavior Analysis (pág. 47-74). Reno: Context Press.
5. Bijou, S.W. (1976). Child Development: The Basic Stage of early childhood. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall (Traducción Desarrollo Infantil, Trillas).
6. Boelens, H. (1994). A traditional account of stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 44, 587-605.
7. Catania, A.C. (1992). Learning. Third Edition. NJ: Englewood Cliffs.
8. Clayton, M.C., y Hayes, L.J. (1999). Conceptual differences in the analysis of stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 49, 145-161.
9. de Rose, J.C., McIlvane, W.J., Dube, W.V., Galpin, V.C., y Stodddard, L. T. (1988). Emergent simple discrimination established by indirect relation to differential consequences. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 1-20.
10. Dougher, M. J., Auguston, E., Markham, M.R., Greenway, D.E., y Wulfert, E. (1994). The transfer of respondent eliciting and extinction functions through stimulus equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 331-351.
11. Dougher, M.J. y Hayes, S. (2000). Clinical Behavior Analysis. En M.J. Dougher (Ed). Clinical Behavior Analysis (pág. 11-26). Reno: Context Press.
12. Dougher, M. J. y Markham, M. R. (1994). Stimulus equivalence, functional equivalence, and the transfer of function. En S. C. Hayes, M. Sato, y K. Ono, (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition (pp. 71-90). Reno, NV: Context Press.
13. Dougher, M. J. y Markham, M. R. (1996). Stimulus classes and the untrained acquisition of stimulus functions. En T. R. Zentall y P. M. Smeets, (Eds.), Stimulus class formation in humans and animals (pp. 137-152). Elsevier: Amsterdam.
14. Dugdale, N., y Lowe, C.F. (1990). Naming and stimulus equivalence. En D. E. Blackman y H. Lejeune (Eds.), Behavior analysis in theory and practice: Contributions and controversies (pp. 115-138). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Dymond, S., y Barnes, D. (1994). A transfer of self-discrimination response function through equivalence relations. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 251-267.
16. Dymond, S., y Rehfeldt, R.A. (2000). Understanding complex behavior: The transformation of Stimulus Functions. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 239-254.
17. Eikeseth, S., Rosalez-Ruiz, J., Duarte, A., y Baer, D.M. (1997). The quick development of equivalence classes in a paper-and-pencil format through written instructions. The Psychological Record, 47, 275-284.
18. Epstein, R. (1985). The spontaneous interconnection of three repertoires. The Psychological Record, 35, 131-141.
19. Fields, L., Adams, B.J., Verhave, T., y Newman, S. (1990). The effects of nodality on the formation of equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 345-358.
20. Gómez, S. (2001). Derivación de relaciones de estímulo y comportamiento verbal. Algunos ejemplos de aplicación al contexto clínico. Análisis y Modificación de Conducta, 27, 111-136.
21. Gómez, S., Barnes-Holmes., y Luciano, M.C. (2001). Generalized break equivalence I. The Psychological Record, 51, 131-150.
22. Greenway, D.E., Dougher, M.J., y Wulfert, E. (1996). Transfer of consequential functions via stimulus equivalence: generalization to different testing contexts. The Psychological Record, 46, 131-143.
23. Harlow, H.F. (1949). The formation of learning sets. Psycological Review, 50, 51-65.
24. Harris, M. (1977/1995). Nuestra especie. Madrid: Alianza.
25. Hayes, L.J. (1992). Equivalence as a process. En S.C. Hayes y L.J. Hayes, (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations (pp. 97-108). Reno, NV: Context Press.
26. Hayes, S.C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. En L. J. Hayes y P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 19-40). Reno,NV: Context Press.
27. Hayes, S.C. (1994). Relational frame theory: A functional approach to verbal events. En S.C Hayes, L.J. Hayes, M. Sato, y K. Ono. (Eds.), Behavior Analysis of Language and Cognition (pp. 9-29). Reno, NV: Context Press.
28. Hayes, S.C., y Barnes, D. (1997). Analyzing Derived Stimulus Relations Require More than the Concept of Stimulus Class. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 235-270.
29. Hayes, S.C., Gifford, E.V., y Wilson, K.G. (1996). Stimulus Classes and Stimulus Relations: Arbitrarily Applicable Relational Responding as an Operant. En T.R. Zentall y P.M. Smeets (Editors), Stimulus Class Formation in Humans and Animals (pp. 279-299). North Holland: Elsevier Science B.V.
30. Hayes, S.C., y Hayes, L.J. (1989). The verbal action of the listener as a basis for rule-governance. En Hayes, S.C. (Ed), Rule-governed behavior. Cognition, contingencies and instructional control (pp. 153-190). New YorK: Plenum.
31. Hayes, S.C., Strosahl, K., y Wilson, K.G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford Press.
32. Hayes, S.C., y Wilson, K.G. (1993). Some applied implications of a contemporary behavior-analytic account of verbal events. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 283-301.
33. Horne, P.J., y Lowe, F. (1996). On the origins of naming and others symbolyc Behavior. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 185-241.
34. Kantor, J.R. (1975). The science of psychology. An interbehavioral survey. Chicago, IL: The Principia Press.
35. Kohlenberg, R,J., y Tsai, M. (1991). Functional analytic psycotherapy: Creating intense and curative therapeutic relationships. New York: Plenum.
36. Leader, G., Barnes, D., & Smeets, P.M. (1996). Establishing equivalence relations using a respondent-type training procedure. The Psychological Record, 46, 685-706.
37. Lipkens, R., Hayes, S. C., & Hayes, L. J. (1993). Longitudinal study of the development of derived relations in an infant. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 201-239.
38. Lowe, C.F., y Beatsy, A. (1987). Language and the emergence of equivalence relations: A developmental study. Bulletin of the Brithish Psychological Society, 40, A42.
39. Luciano, M.C. (1991). Problem solving behavior: An experimental example. Psicothema, 3, 297-317.
40. Luciano, M.C. (1993). La conducta verbal a la luz de recientes investigaciones. Su papel sobre otras conductas verbales y no verbales. Psicothema, 5, 351-374.
41. Luciano, M.C. (1996). Intervención psicológica en Retraso en Desarrollo: Una perspectiva funcional. En Luciano, M.C. (Ed), Manual de Psicología Clínica (pág. 465-526).Valencia: Promolibro.
42. Luciano, M.C. (2000). Applications of research on rule-governed behavior. En J.C. Leslie y D. Blackman (Eds.), Issues in Experimental and Applied Analyses of Human Behavior (pp. 181-204). Reno, NV: Context Press.
43. Luciano, M.C., Barnes-Holmes, D. y Barmes-Holmes, Y. (En prensa). Early verbal development history and equivalence relations. Revista Internacional de Psicología y Terapia Psicológica.
44. Luciano, M.C. y Gómez-Becerra, I. (2000). Equivalence in early development. Manucristo enviado para publicación.
45. Luciano, M.C. y Hayes, S.C. (2001). Trastomo de evitación experiencial. Revista Internacional de Psicología Clínica y de la Salud, 1, 1, 109-157.
46. Luciano, M.C., Herruzo, J., y Barnes-Holmes, D. (2001). Generalization of say-do correspondece. The Psychological Record, 51, 111-130.
47. Markham, M.R. y Dougher, M.J. (1993). Compound stimuli in emergent stimulus relations: Extending the scope of stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 529-542.
48. McIlvaine, W.J., Dube, W.V., y Callahan, T.D. (1995). Attention: A behavior analytic perspectiv4e. En G.R. Lyon y N.A. Krasnegor (Eds.), Attention, memory, and executive function (pág. 97-117). Baltimore, MD.: Paul H. Brookes.
49. Pérez Gónzalez, L.A., y Moreno-Sierra, V. (1999). Equivalence formation in elderly persons. Psychothema, 11, 325-336.
50. Pryor, K.W., Haag, R., y O'Reilly, J. (1969). The creative porpoise: Training for novel behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 653-661.
51. Rehfeldt, R.A., y Hayes, L.J. (1998). The operant-respondent distinction revisited: Toward an understanding of stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 48, 187-210.
52. Ribes, E., y López, V. (1985). Teoría de la conducta: Un análisis de campo y paramétrico. México: Trillas.
53. Ribes, E., Moreno, D., y Martínez, C. (1995). Efecto de distintos criterios verbales de igualación en la adquisición y transferencia de una discriminación condicional de segundo orden en humanos. Acta Comportamentalia, 3, 1, 27-54.
54. Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. Londres: Hutchinson.
55. Schusterman, R. J., y Kastak, D. (1993). A California sea lion is capable of forming equivalence relations. The Psychological Record, 43, 823-839.
56. Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.
57. Sidman, M., y Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5-22.
58. Skinner, B.F. (1953). Science and human behavior. NY: The Macmillan Co.
59. Skinner, B.F. (1957). Verbal Behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
60. Skinner, B.F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement.A theoretical analysis.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
61. Steele, D., & Hayes, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519-555.
62. Stokes, T. F., y Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349-367.
63. Strommer, R., McIlvane, W.J., y Serna, R.W. (1993). Complex stimulus control and equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 585-598.
64. Strommer, R., y Strommer, J.B. (1993). The formation of arbitrary stimulus classes in matching to complex samples. The Psychological Record, 40, 51-56.
65. Valero, L., y Luciano, M.C. (1992). Relaciones de equivalencia: una sintesis teorica y los datos empíricos a nivel básico y aplicado. Psicothema, 4, 413-428.
66. Vaughan, M.E. (1989). Rule-governed behavior in behavior analysis: A theoretical and experimental history. En S.C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies and instructional control (pág. 97-118). New York: Plenum Press.
67. Wilson, K.G., y Blackledge, J.T. (2000). Recent developments in the behavioral analysis of language: Making sense of clinical phenomena. En M.J. Dougher. (Ed.), Clinical behavior analysis (pp. 27-46). Reno: Context Press.
68. Wilson, K.G., y Hayes, S.C. (2000). Why it is crucial to understand thinking and feeling: An analysis and application to drug abuse. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 25-43.
69. Wittgenstein, L. (1982). Ültimos escritos sobre Filosofía de la Psicología. Madrid: Tecnos.
70. Ybarra, J.L. Luciano, M.C., y Gómez, S. (En prensa). Relaciones de equivalencia: Competitividad entre la historia pre-experimental y experimental. Revista Internacional de Psicología Clínica y de la Salud.