Generalized break equivalence I

Psychological Record

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 131-150

  Gómez, Serafín ^b   Barnes Holmes, Dermot ^a   Luciano, M Carmen ^b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALMERÍA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035580865     PISSN: 00332933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03395390     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. BAER, D. M., PETERSON, R. F., & SHERMAN, J. A. (1967). The development of imitation by reinforcing behavioral similarity to a model. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 10, 405-416.
2. BARNES, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44, 91-124.
3. BARNES, D., BROWNE, M., SMEETS, P. M., & ROCHE, B. (1995). A transfer of functions and a conditional transfer of functions through equivalence relations in three- to six-year-old children. The Psychological Record, 45, 405-430.
4. BARNES, D., & HOLMES, Y. (1991). Radical behaviorism, stimulus equivalence, and human cognition. The Psychological Record, 41, 19-31.
5. BARNES, D., LAWLOR, H., SMEETS, P. M., & ROCHE, B. (1996). Stimulus equivalence an academic self-concept among mildly mentally handicapped and nonhandicapped children. The Psychological Record, 46, 87-107.
6. BARNES, D., MCCULLAGH, P. D., & KEENAN, M. (1990). Equivalence class formation in non-hearing impaired children and hearing impaired children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 1-11.
7. BARNES, D., & ROCHE, B. (1996). Relational frame theory and stimulus equivalence are fundamentally different: A reply to Saunders' commentary. The Psychological Record, 46, 489-507.
8. BARNES, D., SMEETS, P. M., & LEADER, G. (1996). New procedures for establishing emergent maching performances in children and adults: Implications for stimulus equivalence. In T. R. Zentall & P. M. Smeets (Eds.), Stimulus class formation in humans and animals (pp. 153-171). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V.
9. BARNES-HOLMES, D., & BARNES-HOLMES, Y. (2000). Explaining complex behavior: Two perspectives on the concept of generalized operant classes. The Psychological Record, 50, 251-265.
10. BOELENS, H. (1994). A traditional account of stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 44, 587-605.
11. BOELENS, H. (1996). Accounting for stimulus equivalence: Reply to Hayes and Wilson. The Psychological Record, 46, 237-242.
12. CARRIGAN, P. F., Jr., & SIDMAN, M. (1992). Conditional discrimination and equivalence relations: A theoretical analysis of control by negative stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58, 459-504.
13. DEVANY, J. M., HAYES, S. C., & NELSON, R. O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 243-257.
14. DOUGHER, M. J., PERKINS, D., & CHIASSON, C. (1997). The contextual control over the transfer of functions through stimulus equivalence classes. Paper presented at the European Meeting for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. Dublin.
15. DUBE, W. V., GREEN, G., & SERNA, R. W. (1993). Auditory successive conditional discrimination and auditory stimulus equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 103-114.
16. DUBE, W. V., MCILVANE, W. J., MACKAY, H. A., & STODDARD, L. T. (1987). Stimulus class membership established via stimulus-reinforcer relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 47, 159-175.
17. EIKESETH, S., & BAER, D. M. (1997). Use of a preexisting verbal relation to prevent the properties of stimulus equivalence from emerging in new relations. In D. M. Baer & E. M. Pinkston (Eds.), Environment and behavior (pp. 138-144). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
18. FIELDS, L., ADAMS, B. J., VERHAVE, T., & NEWMAN, S. (1990). The effects of nodality on the formation of equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 345-358.
19. GÓMEZ, S. (1998). Ruptura de relaciones de equivalencia. Un análisis de las variables implicadas [Breaking of equivalence relations. An analysis of the variables involved]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Almería.
20. GÓMEZ, S., HUERTA, F., BARNES, D., LUCIANO, M. C., & SMEETS, P. M. (1999). Breaking equivalence relations. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 17, 1-4.
21. GREEN, G., STROMER, R., & MACKAY, H. A. (1993). Relational learning in stimulus sequences. The Psychological Record, 43, 599-615.
22. HARLOW, H. F. (1949). The formation of learning sets. Psycological Review, 56, 51-65.
23. HAYES, S. C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 19-40). Reno, NV: Context Press.
24. HAYES, S. C. (1992). Verbal relations, time and suicide. In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations (pp. 109-118)). Reno, NV: Context Press.
25. HAYES, S. C. (1994). Relational frame theory: A functional approach to verbal events. In S. C Hayes, L. J. Hayes, M. Sato, & K. Ono (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition (pp. 9-30). Reno, NV: Context Press.
26. HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1989). The verbal action of the listener as a basis for rule-governance. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior. Cognition, contingencies and instructional control (pp. 153-190). New York: Plenum.
27. HAYES, S. C., STROSAHL, K., & WILSON, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experimental approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford Press.
28. HEALY, O., BARNES, D., & SMEETS, P. M. (1998). Derived relational responding as an operant: The effects of between session feedback. The Psychological Record, 48, 511-536.
29. HORNE, P. J., & LOWE, F. (1997). Toward a therory of verbal behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 271-296.
30. LOWENKRON, B., & COLVIN, V. (1995). Generalized instructional control and the production of broadly applicable relational responding. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 12, 13-29.
31. LUCIANO, M. C. (1989). Problem-solving behavior: A conceptual account. Revista Mexicana de Anlisis de la Conducta, 15, 1, 87-97.
32. LUCIANO, M. C. (1999). Fórmulas verbales y cognición [Verbal formulas and cognition]. Manuscript submitted for publication.
33. LUCIANO, M. C., HERRUZO, J., & BARNES-HOLMES, D. (2001). Generalization of say-do correspondence. The Psychological Record, 51, 111-130.
34. MARKHAM, M. R., & DOUGHER, M. J. (1993). Compound stimuli in emergent stimulus relations: Extending the scope of stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 529-542.
35. MCDONAGH, E. C., MCILVANE, W. J., & STODDARD, L. T. (1984). Teaching coin equivalences via matching to sample. Applied Research in Mental Retardation, 5, 177-197.
36. MCILVANE, W. J., DUBE, W. V., & CALLAHAN, T. D. (1995). Attention: A behavior analytic perspective. In G. R. Lyon & N. A. Krasnegor (Eds.), Attention, memory, and excecutive function (pp. 97-117). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
37. MOXON, R D., KEENAN, M., & HINE, L. (1993). Gender-role stereotyping and stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 381-393.
38. NEVIN, J. A. (1974). Response strength in multiple schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 21, 389-408.
39. PILGRIM, C., & GALIZIO, M. (1990). Relations between baseline contingencies and equivalence probe performances. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 213-224.
40. PILGRIM, C., & GALIZIO, M. (1995). Reversal of baseline relations and stimulus equivalence: I. Adults. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 63, 225-238.
41. PRYOR, K. W., HAAG, R., & O'REILLY, J. (1969). The creative porpoise: Training for novel behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 653-661.
42. RESCORLA, R. A., & WAGNER, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
43. ROCHE, B., BARNES, D., & SMEETS, P. (1997). Incongruous stimulus pairing and conditional discrimination training: Effects on relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67, 275-301.
44. SAUNDERS, R. R., SAUNDERS, K. J., KIRBY, K. C., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1988). The merger and development of equivalence classes by unreinforced conditional selection of comparison stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 145-162.
45. SAUNDERS, K. J., SAUNDERS, R. R., WILLIAMS, D. C., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1993). An interaction of instructions and training design on stimulus class formation: Extending the analysis of equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 725-744.
46. SIDMAN, M. (1990). Equivalence relations: Where do they come from?. In D. E. Blackman & H. Lejeune (Eds.), Behavior analysis in theory and practice: Contributions and controversies (pp. 93-114). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. SIDMAN, M. (1992). Equivalence relations: Some basic consideration. In Steven C. Hayes & Linda J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations (pp. 15-27). Reno, NV: Context Press.
48. SIDMAN, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.
49. SIDMAN, M., & TAILBY, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination versus matching-to-sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5-22.
50. SIDMAN, M., WILLSON-MORRIS, M., & KIRK, B. (1986). Matching-to-sample procedures and the development of equivalence relations: The role of naming. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 6, 1-19.
51. SPRADLIN, J. E., SAUNDERS, K. J., & SAUNDERS, R. R. (1992). The stability of equivalence classes. In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations (pp. 29-43). Reno, NV: Context Press.
52. STROMER, R., MCILVANE, W. J., & SERNA, R. W. (1993). Complex stimulus control and equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 585-598.
53. VALERO, L. (1990). La emergencia de nuevas conductas a través de relaciones de equivalencia: Análisis experimental de sus componentes básicos y aplicaciones. [The emergence of new behaviors through equivalence relations: Experimental analysis of the basic components and applications]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Granada.
54. VALERO, L., & LUCIANO, M. C. (1992). Factores de control en la aparición de simetría en las relaciones de equivalencia: Importancia de la funcionalidad de los estímulos [Controlling factors in the emergence of symmetry in equivalence relations: importance of the functionality of stimuli]. Psicológica, 13, 243-259.
55. VALERO, L., & LUCIANO, M. C. (1993). Relaciones de equivalencia: un estudio de replicación del efecto de la relación simétrica sobre la transitiva [Equivalence relations: A study of replication of the effect of symmetry on transitivity]. Apuntes de psicología, 37, 25-39.
56. WILSON, K. G., & HAYES, S. C. (1996). Resurgence of derived stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 66, 267-281.
57. YBARRA, J. L., & LUCIANO, M. C. (1998). Influencia de relaciones verbales preexistentes en la formación de relaciones de equivalencia [Influence of preexisting verbal relations in the formation of equivalence relations]. Paper presented at the Fourth International Congress on Behaviorism and the Sciences of Behavior. Seville.