Conceptual differences in the analysis of stimulus equivalence

Psychological Record

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 145-161

  Clayton, Michael C ^a   Hayes, Linda J ^b  

^a UOG Station   (Guam)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033469384     PISSN: 00332933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03395312     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. BARNES, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44, 91-124.
2. BARNES, D. (1996). Naming as a technical term: Sacrificing behavior analysis at the altar of popularity. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 264-266.
3. BARNES, D., & HAMPSON, P. J. (1997). Connectionist models of arbitrarily applicable relations responding: A possible role for the hippocampal system. In J. Donahoe (Ed.), Neural network models of cognition: Biobehavioral Foundations. Advances in psychology, Vol. 121 (pp. 496-521). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers.
4. BARNES, D., & HOLMES, Y. (1991). Radical behaviorism, stimulus equivalence, and human cognition. The Psychological Record, 41, 19-31.
5. BISHOP, D. V. M., & ROBSON, J. (1989). Unimpaired short-term memory and rhyme judgment in congenitally speechless individuals: Implications for the notion of "Articulatory coding." The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 123-140.
6. BOELENS, H. (1994). A traditional account of stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 44, 587-605.
7. BUSH, K. M., SIDMAN, M., & DE ROSE, T. (1989). Contextual control of emergent equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 29-45.
8. CATANIA, A. C. (1996). On the origins of behavior structure. In T. R. Zentall & P. M. Smeets (Eds.), Stimulus class formation in humans and animals (pp. 3-12). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
9. COWLEY, B. J., GREEN, G., & BRAUNLING-MCMORROW, D. (1992). Using stimulus equivalence procedures to teach name-face matching to adults with brain injuries. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 461-475.
10. DE ROSE, J. C., DE SOUZA, D. G., ROSSITO, A. L., & DE ROSE, T. M. S. (1992). Stimulus equivalence and generalization in reading after matching to sample by exclusion. In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations (pp. 68-82). Reno, NV: Context Press.
11. DEVANY, J. M., HAYES, S. C., & NELSON, R. O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 243-257.
12. DOUGHER, M. J., & MARKHAM, M. R. (1994). Stimulus equivalence, functional equivalence and the transfer of function. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, M. Sato, & K. Ono (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition. Reno, NV: Context Press.
13. DUGDALE, N. (1996). Naming, stimulus equivalence, and conditioned hearing. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65(1), 272-274.
14. DUGDALE, N., & LOWE, C. F. (1990). Naming and stimulus equivalence. In D. E. Blackman & H. LeJeune (Eds.), Behaviour analysis in theory and practice: Contributions and controversies. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. DYMOND, S., & BARNES, D. (1995). A transformation of self discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness, more-than, and less-than. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 163-184.
16. EIKESETH, S., & SMITH, T. (1992). The development of functional and equivalence classes in high-functioning autistic children: The role of naming. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58, 123-133.
17. EPSTEIN, R. (1985). The spontaneous interconnection of three repertories. The Psychological Record, 35, 131-141.
18. GOULD, S. J. (1977). Ontogeny and phylogeny. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. GREEN, G., STROMER, R., & MACKAY, H. A. (1993). Relational learning in stimulus sequences. The Psychological Record, 43, 599-615.
20. GREY, I. M., & BARNES, D. (1996). Stimulus equivalence and attitudes. The Psychological Record, 46, 243-270.
21. HAYES, L. J. (1992). Equivalence as process. In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations. Reno, NV: Context Press.
22. HAYES, L. J. (1996). Listening with understanding and speaking with meaning. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 282-283.
23. HAYES, S. C. (1989). Nonhumans have not yet shown stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 385-392.
24. HAYES, S. C. (1991). A relation control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 19-40). Reno, NV: Context Press.
25. HAYES, S. C. (1994). Relational frame theory: A functional approach to verbal events. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, M. Sato, & K. Ono (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition. Reno, NV: Context Press.
26. HAYES, S. C., & BARNES, D. (1997). Analyzing derived stimulus relations requires more than the concept of stimulus class. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68(2), 235-244.
27. HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1989). The verbal action of the listener as a basis for rule-governance. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control. New York: Plenum Press.
28. HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1992). Verbal relations and the evolution of behavior analysis. American Psychologist, 47(11), 1383-1395.
29. HORNE, P. J., & LOWE, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 185-241.
30. JAMES, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. (Vol. 1). New York: Holt.
31. KANTOR, J. R. (1959). Interbehavioral psychology: A sample of scientific system construction. Granville, OH: The Principia Press.
32. KANTOR, J. R. (1977). Psychological linguistics. Chicago, IL: The Principia Press.
33. LIPKENS, R. (1992). A behavioral analysis of complex human functioning: Analogical reasoning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada.
34. LOWE, C. F., & BEASTY, A. (1987). Language and the emergence of equivalence relations: A developmental study. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 40, A42.
35. LOWE, C. F., & HORNE, P. J. (1996). Reflections on naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 315-340.
36. MACE, C. F. (1996). In pursuit of general behavioral relations. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29(4), 557-563.
37. MARKHAM, M. R., & DOUGHER, M. J. (1993). Compound stimuli in emergent stimulus relations: Extending the scope of stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 529-542.
38. MATOS, M. A., & HUBNER-D'OLIVEIRA, M. M. (1992). Equivalence relations and reading. In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations (pp. 83-96). Reno, NV: Context Press.
39. MCILVANE, W. J., & DUBE, W. V. (1990). Do stimulus classes exist before they are tested? The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 13-17.
40. NEVIN, J. A. (1995). Behavioral economics and behavioral momentum. Special Issue: Behavioral economics. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64(3), 385-395.
41. PARROTT, L. J. (1984). Listening and understanding. The Behavior Analyst, 7, 29-39.
42. ROCHE, B., & BARNES, D. (1996). Arbitrarily applicable relational responding and sexual categorization: A critical test of the derived difference relation. The Psychological Record, 46, 451-476.
43. SAUNDERS, R. R., & GREEN, G. (1992). The nonequivalence of behavioral and mathematical equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 57, 227-241.
44. SCHUSTERMAN, R. J., & KASTAK, D. (1993). A California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) is capable of forming equivalence relations. The Psychological Record, 43, 823-839.
45. SIDMAN, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 5-13.
46. SIDMAN, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent stimulus classes. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 213-245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. SIDMAN, M. (1990). Equivalence relations: Where do they come from? In D. E. Blackman & H. LeJeune (Eds.), Behaviour analysis in theory and practice: Contributions and controversies. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
48. SIDMAN, M. (1992). Equivalence relations: Some basic considerations. In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations. Reno, NV: Context Press.
49. SIDMAN, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston, MA: Authors Cooperative Inc.
50. SIDMAN, M., & TAILBY, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5-22.
51. SKINNER, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: The Free Press.
52. SKINNER, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
53. SKINNER, B. F. (1963). Behaviorism at fifty. Science, 140, 951-958.
54. STEELE, D. L., & HAYES, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519-555.
55. STEMMER, N. (1995). Do we need an alternative theory of verbal behavior?: A reply to Hayes and Wilson. The Behavior Analyst, 18, 357-362.
56. VYGOTSKY, L. S. (1978). Mind in science: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57. YAMAMOTO, J., & ASANO, T. (1995). Stimulus equivalence in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). The Psychological Record, 45, 3-21.