Effect size and statistical significance;Tamaño del efecto del tratamiento y significación estadística

Psicothema

Volumn 12, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2000, Pages 236-240

  Frías Navarro, María Dolores ^a   Pascual Llobell, Juan ^a   García Pérez, José Fernando ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347644801     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Abelson, R. P. (1997a). A retrospective on the significance test ban of 1999 (if there were no significance tests, they would be invented). En L. L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik y J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Abelson, R. P. (1997b). On the surprising longevity of flogged horses: Why there is a case for the significance test. Psychological Science, 8, 12-15.
3. Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., Sechrest, L. y Reno, R. R (1990). Graduate training in statistics, methodology and measurement in psychology. American Psychologist, 45, 721-734.
4. th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
5. Bakan, D. (1966). The effect of significance testing in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 423-437.
6. Bakan, D. (1967). On method: Toward a reconstruction of psychological investigation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Carver, R. P. (1978). The case against statistical significance testing. Harvard Educational Review, 48, 378-399.
8. Carver, R. P. (1993). The case against statistical significance testing, revisited. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 287-292.
9. Chow, S. L. (1988). Significance test or effect size? Psychological Bulletin, 103, 15-110.
10. Chow, S. L. (1996). Statistical significance. Rationale, validity and utility. London, UK: Sage Publications.
11. Clark-Carter, D. (1997). The account taken of statistical power in research published in the British Journal of Psychology. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 71-83.
12. Cohen, J. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: a review. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65, 145-153.
13. Cohen, J. (1969): Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press.
14. nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Cohen, J. (1990). Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist, 45, 1304-1312.
16. Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003.
17. Cohen, J. (1997, August). Much ado about nothing. Lecture presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago.
18. Cortina, J. M., & Dunlap, W. P. (1997). Logic and purpose of significance testing. Psychological Methods, 2, 161-172.
19. Cowles, M. (1989). Statistics in psychology: An historical perspective. Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Craig, J. R., Eison, C. L., & Metze, L. P. (1976). Significance tests and their interpretation: An example utilizing published research and omega-squared. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 7, 280-282.
21. Falk, R., & Greenbaum, C. W. (1995). Significance tests die hard: the amazing persistence of a probabilistic misconception. Theory and Psychology, 2, 75-98.
22. Fowler, R. L. (1985). Testing for substantive significance in applied research by specifying nonzero null hypotheses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 215-218.
23. Friedman, H. (1982). Simplified determinations of statistical power, magnitude of efect and research sample size. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42, 521-526.
24. Fritz, R. W. (1995). Accepting the null hypothesis. Memory & Cognition, 23, 132-138.
25. Fritz, R. W. (1996). The appropriate use of null hypothesis testing. Psychological Methods, 1, 379-390.
26. Gigerenzer, G., Swijtink, Z., Porter, T., Daston, L., Beatty, J., & Krüger, L. (1989). The empire of chance: How probability changed science and everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Greenwald, A. G., Gonzalez, R., Harris, R. J., & Guthrie, D. (1996). Effect size and p-values: What should be reported and what should be replicated? Psychophysiology, 33, 175-183.
28. Hagen, R. L. (1997). In praise of the null hypothesis statistical test. American Psychologist, 52, 15-24.
29. Hansen, J. C. (1995). Revised APA style manual recommended to authors. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 28, 67-68.
30. Harlow, L. L., Mulaik, S. A., & Steiger, J. H. (Eds.) (1997). What if there were no significances tests? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. Heldref Publications (1997). Guidelines for contributors. Journal of Experimental Education, 65, 95-96.
32. Henkel, R. E. (1976). Tests of significance. London, UK: Sage Publications. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences series, Vol. 4.
33. Howlin, P. (1997). When is a significant change not significant?. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 27, 347-348.
34. Hunter, J. E. (1997). Needed: A ban on the significance test. Psychological Science, 8, 3-7.
35. Kirk, R. E. (1996). Practical significance: a concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 746-759.
36. Levin, J. R. (1993). Statistical significance testing from three perspectives. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 378-382.
37. Loftus, G. R. (1993). Editorial comment. Memory & Cognition, 21, 1-3.
38. Manzano, V. (1997). Usos y abusos del error de Tipo I. Psicológica. Revista de Metodología. 18, 153-169.
39. McClure, J., & Suen, H. K. (1994). Interpretation of statistical significance testing: A matter of perspective. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education., 14, 88-100.
40. Meehl, P. E. (1978). Theoretical risk and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald and the slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806-834.
41. Morrison, D. E., & Henkel, R. E. (Eds.) (1970). The significance test controversy: a reader. Chicago: Aldine.
42. Murphy, K. R. (1997). Editorial. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 3-5.
43. Murphy, K. R. & Myors, B. (1998). Statistical power analysis: A simple and general model for traditional and modern hypothesis tests. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
44. Murphy, K. R. & Myors, B. (1999). Testing the hypothesis that treatments have negligible effects: Minimun-effect tests in the general linear model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 234-2484.
45. Rouanet, H. (1996). Bayesian methods for assessing importance of effects. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 149-158
46. Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for the training of researchers. Psychological Methods, 1, 115-129.
47. Sedmeir, P. & Gigerenzer, G. (1989). Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies? Psychological Bulletin, 105, 309-316.
48. Serlin, R. C., & Lapsley, D. K. (1985). Rationality in psychological research: the good-enough principle. American Psychologist, 40, 73-83.
49. Serlin, R. C., & Lapsley, D. K. (1993). Rational appraisal of psychological research and the good enough principle. En G. Keren y C. Lewis, (Eds.), A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences: methodological issues. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50. Shaver, J. (1985). Chance and nonsense. Phi Delta Happan, 67, 57-60.
51. Shea, C. (1996). Psychologists debate accuracy of «significance test». Chronicle of Higher Education, 42, A12, A16.
52. Snyder, P. & Lawson, S. (1993). Evaluating results using corrected and uncorrected effect size estimates. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 334-349.
53. Snyder, P. A., & Thompson, B. (1998). Use of tests of statistical significance and other analytic choices in a school psychology journal: Review of practice and suggested alternatives. School Psychology Quarterly, 13, 335-348.
54. Thompson, B. & Snyder, P. A., (1998). Statistical significance testing y reliability analyses in recent JCD research articles. Journal of Counseling and Development, 76, 436-441.
55. Thompson, B. & Snyder, P. A., (1997). Statistical significance testing practices in the Journal of Experimental Education. Journal of Experimental Education, 66, 75-83.
56. Thompson, B. (1988). A note about significance testing. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 20, 146-148.
57. Thompson, B. (1989). Asking «what if» questions about significance tests. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 22, 66-68.
58. Thompson, B. (1993). The use of statistical significance tests in research: Bootstrap and other alternatives. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 361-377.
59. Thompson, B. (1994). Guidelines for authors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 837-847.
60. Thompson, B. (1996). AERA editorial policies regarding statistical significance testing: Three suggested reforms. Educational Researcher, 25, 26-30.
61. Thompson, B. (1997, August). If statistical significance tests are broken/misused, what practices should supplement or replace them?. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago.
62. Thompson, B. (1999a). If statistical significance tests are broken/misused, what practices should supplement or replace them? Theory and Psychology, 9, 165-181.
63. Thompson, B. (1999b). Statistical significance tests, effect size reporting and the vain pursuit of pseudo-objectivity. Theory and psychology, 9, 191-196.
64. Thompson, B. (1999c). Why «encouraging» effect size reporting is not working: The etiology of researcher resistance to changing practices. Journal of Psychology, 133, 133-140.
65. Thompson, B. (1999d). Improving research clarity and usefulness with effect size indices as supplements to statistical significance tests. Exceptional Children, 65, 329-337.
66. Vacha-Haase, T., & Ness, C. M. (1999). Statistical significance testing as it relates to practice: Use within Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 30, 104-105.
67. Vacha-Haase, T., & Nilsson, J. E. (1998). Statistical significance reporting: Current trends and usages within MECD. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 31, 46-57.
68. Valera, A. & Sánchez, J. (1997). Pruebas de significación y magnitud del efecto: reflexiones y propuestas. Anales de Psicología, 13, 85-90.
69. Young, M. A. (1993). Supplementing tests of statistical significance: Variation accounted for. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 644-656.