Perceptual polarization of managerial performance from a human resource management perspective

International Journal of Human Resource Management

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 256-269

  Fraser, Campbell ^a   Zarkada Fraser, Anna ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

360 performance measurement; Australia; Perceptual polarization; Singapore

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347609000     PISSN: 09585192     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09585190010014638     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Baruch, Y. (1996) 'Self-Performance Appraisal vs. Direct-Manager Appraisal: A Case of Congruence', Journal of Managerial Psychology, 11(6): 50-65.
2. Borman, W. (1997) '360 Degree Ratings: An Analysis of Assumptions and a Research Agenda for Evaluating their Validity', Human Resource Management Review, 7(3): 299-315.
3. Boyatzis, R. (1982) The Competent Manager: A Model for Effective Performance. New York: Wiley.
4. Boyatzis, R. (1993) 'Beyond Competence: The Choice to Be a Leader', Human Resource Management Review, 3(1): 1-14.
5. Brown, R. (1993) 'Meta-Competence: A Recipe for Reframing the Competence Debate', Personnel Review, 22(6): 25-36.
6. Brutus, S., Fleenor, J. and London, M. (1998) 'Does 360-Degree Feedback Work in Different Industries? A Between-industry Comparison of the Reliability and Validity of Multi-source Performance Ratings', Journal of Management Development, 17(3): 177-90.
7. Campbell, J., McCloy, R., Oppler, S. and Sager, C. (1993) 'A Theory of Performance'. In Schmitt, N. and Borman, W. (eds) Personnel Selection in Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8. Cheung, G. (1999) 'Multifaceted Conceptions of Self-Other Ratings Disagreement', Personnel Psychology, 52: 1-36.
9. Church, A. and Bracken, D. (1997) 'Advancing the State of the Art of 360-Degree Feedback', Group and Organization Management, 22(2): 149-61.
10. Delbecq, A., Van de Ven, A. and Gustafson, D. (1975) Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
11. Dobson, P. (1989) 'Self and Peer Assessment'. In Herriot, P. (ed.) Assessment and Selection in Organisations: Methods and Practice for Recruitment and Appraisal. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
12. Edwards, R. (1996) 360 Degree Feedback: The Powerful New Model for Employee Assessment & Performance Improvement. New York: Amacom.
13. Fletcher, C. (1999) 'The Implications of Research on Gender Differences in Self-Assessment and 360 Degree Appraisal', Human Resource Management Journal, 9(1): 39-46.
14. Fletcher, C. and Baldry, C. (1999) 'Multi-source Feedback Systems: A Research Perspective'. In Cooper, C. and Robertson, T. (eds) International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chichester: Wiley.
15. Fraser, C. (1999) 'A Non-Results-Based Effectiveness Index for Construction Site Managers', Construction Management and Economics, 17(6).
16. Fraser, C. and Zarkada-Fraser, A. (2000) 'Measuring the Performance of Retail Managers in Australia and Singapore', International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 28(6): 228-42.
17. Fried, Y., Levi, A., Ben-David, H. and Tiegs, R. (1999) 'Inflation of Subordinates' Performance Ratings: Main and Interactive Effects of Rater Negative Affectivity, Documentation of Work Behavior, and Appraisal Visibility', Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 20: 431-44.
18. Furnham, A. and Stringfield, P. (1994) 'Congruence of Self and Subordinate Ratings of Managerial Practices as a Correlate of Supervisor Evaluation', Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67(1): 57-67.
19. Hofstede, G. (1980) Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values, Cross-Cultural Research and Methodology Series. Beverley Hills and London: Sage Publications.
20. Hunter, J. and Hirsch, H. (1987) 'Application of Meta-Analysis'. In Cooper, C. and Robertson, I. (eds) International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chichester: Wiley.
21. Hurley, S. (1998) 'Application of Team-based 360 Degree Feedback Systems', Team Performance Management, 4(5): 202-10.
22. Jones, J. and Brearley, W. (1996) 360 Degree Feedback: Strategies, Tactics, and Techniques for Developing Leaders. Minneapolis, MN: Lakewood.
23. Jones, T. (1995) 'Performance Management in a Changing Context: Monsanto Pioneers a Competency-based Developmental Approach', Human Resource Management, 34(3): 425-42.
24. Lee, J. and Akhtar, S. (1996) 'Determinants of Employee Willingness to Use Feedback for Performance Improvement: Cultural and Organizational Interpretations', International Journal of Human Resource Management, 7(4): 878-90.
25. London, M. and Wohlers, A. (1991) 'Agreement between Subordinate and Self-Ratings in Upward Feedback', Personnel Psychology, 44(2): 375-90.
26. Lusch, R. and Serpkenci, R. (1990) 'Personal Differences, Job Outcomes and Store Performance: A Study of Retail Store Managers', Journal of Marketing, 54(1): 85-101.
27. Mabe, P. and West, S. (1982) 'Validity of Self-Evaluation of Ability: A Review and Meta-Analysis', Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(3): 280-96.
28. McEvoy, G. and Beatty, R. (1989) 'Assessment Centres and Subordinates Appraisals of Managers: A Seven Year Examination of Predictive Ability', Personnel Psychology, 42(1): 37-52.
29. Maurer, T. and Tarulli, B. (1996) 'Acceptance of Peer/Upward Performance Systems: Role of Work Context Factors and Beliefs about Managers' Development Capability', Human Resource Management, 35(2): 217-41.
30. Nilsen, D. and Campbell, D. (1993) 'Self-Observer Rating Discrepancies: Once an Overrater, Always an Overrater?', Human Resource Management, 32(2-3): 265-81.
31. Norusis, M. (1994) SPSS Professional Statistics 6.1. Chicago: SPSS.
32. Peiperl, M. (1999) 'Conditions for the Success of Peer Evaluation', International Journal of Human Resource Management, 10(3): 429-58.
33. Polack, D.M. and Polack, L.J. (1996) 'Using 360 Degree Feedback in Performance Appraisal', Public Personnel Management, 25(4): 507-28.
34. Snape, E., Thompson, D., Yan, F. and Redman, T. (1998) 'Performance Appraisal and Culture: Practice and Attitudes in Hong Kong and Great Britain', International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(5): 841-61.
35. Sonnentag, S. (1998) 'Identifying High Performers: Do Peer Nominations Suffer from a Likeability Bias?', European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 7(4): 501-15.
36. Stathakopoulos, V. (1995) 'Enhancing the Performance of Marketing Managers: Aligning Strategy, Structure and Evaluation Systems', European Journal of Marketing, 32(5): 536-58.
37. Tornow, W. (1993) 'Perceptions of Reality: Is Multi-perspective Measurement a Means or an End?', Human Resource Management, 32(2): 221-30.
38. Waldman, D. and Bowen, D. (1998) 'The Acceptability of 360 Degree Appraisals: A Customer-Supplier Relationship Perspective', Human Resource Management, 37(2): 117-29.
39. Ward, P. (1997) 360-degree Feedback. London: Institute of Personnel and Development.
40. Werner, J. (1994) 'Dimensions that Make a Difference: Examining the Impact of In-Role and Extra-Role Behaviors on Supervisory Ratings', Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(1): 98-107.
41. Winterton, J. and Winterton, R. (1999) Developing Managerial Competence. London: Routledge.
42. Wohlers, A. and London, M. (1989) 'Ratings of Managerial Characteristics: Evaluation Difficulty, Co-worker Agreement, and Self-awareness', Personnel Psychology, 45: 235-61.