Determinants of employee willingness to use feedback for performance improvement: Cultural and organizational interpretations

International Journal of Human Resource Management

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 878-890

  Lee, Jenny S Y ^a   Akhtar, Syed ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Culture; Fairness and accuracy; Feedback; Performance evaluation; Trust

Indexed keywords

EID: 0346681472     PISSN: 09585192     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09585199600000161     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Annett, J. (1969) Feedback and Human Behaviour. Baltimore, MD: Penguin.
2. Bretz, R.D., Milkovich, G.T. and Read, W. (1992) The Current State of Performance Appraisal Research and Practice: Concerns, Directions, and Implications', Journal of Management, 18: 321-52.
3. Cleveland, J.N., Murphy, K.R. and Williams, R.E. (1989) 'Multiple uses of Performance Appraisal: Prevalence and Correlates', Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 130-5.
4. Landy, F.J., Barnes, J.L. and Murphy, K.R. (1978) 'Correlates of Perceived Fairness and Accuracy of Performance Evaluation', Journal of Applied Psychology, 6: 751-4.
5. Lawler, E.E. (1967) 'The Multi-trait Multi-rate Approach to Measuring Managerial Job Performance', Journal of Applied Psychology, 51: 369-81.
6. Meyer, H., Kay, E. and French, J. (1965) 'Split Roles in Performance Appraisal', Harvard Business Review, 43: 123-9.
7. Triandis, H.C., Bontempo, R., Leung, K. and Hui, C.H. (1990) 'A Method for Determining Cultural, Demographic, and Personal Constructs', Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21: 302-19.
8. Wayne, S.J. and Ferris, G.R. (1990) 'Influence Tactics, Affect, and Exchange Quality in Supervisor-subordinate Interactions: A Laboratory Study and Field Study', Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 487-99.