Application of team-based 360° feedback systems

Team Performance Management: An International Journal

Volumn 4, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 202-210

  Hurley, Simon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Feedback; Performance measurement; Teams

Indexed keywords

EID: 84986076337     PISSN: 13527592     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/13527599810234164     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bettenhausen, K.L. and Fedor, D.B. (1997, “Peer and upward appraisals: a comparison of their benefits and problems”, Group and Organization Management, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 235-63.
2. Chlebos, T., Grace, C., Klaus, J., Larson, B., Montee, D., Sawisky, D., Speer, R., Stefka, J. and Traeger, J. (1996, “From vision to revision: developing a peer appraisal process for the manufacturing environment”, The 1996 International Conference On Work Teams - Proceedings, pp. 151-5.
3. Church, A.H. and Bracken, D.W. (1997, “Advancing the state of the art of 360-degree feedback”, Group and Organization Management, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 149-61.
4. Edwards, M.R. and Ewen, A.J. (1996, Providing 360-Degree Feedback: An Approach to Enhancing Individual and Organizational Performance, American Compensation Association, Scottsdale, AZ.
5. Funderburg, S.A., and Levy, P.E. (1997, “The influence of individual and contextual variable on 360° feedback system attitudes”, Group and Organization Management, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 210-35.
6. Gebelein, S.H., Kinard, W. and Mitchell, D. (1998, “The challenges of making 360-degree performance appraisal work”, Personnel Decisions Inc, Presentation and materials from the 1998 International Conference On Work Teams.
7. Hitchcock, D. (1996, “What are people doing around peer review?”, The 1996 International Conference On Work Teams - Proceedings, 117-120.
8. Jones, J.E. and Bearly, W.L. (1996, 360-Degree Feedback: Strategies, Tactics, and Techniques for Developing Leaders, HRD Press, Amherst, MA.
9. Just, K. (1996, “A team performance management system that REALLY works!”, The 1996 International Conference On Work Teams - Proceedings, pp. 121-4.
10. London, M., Smither, J.W. and Adsit, D.J. (1997, “Accountability: the achilles heel of multisource feedback”, Group and Organization Management, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 162-84.
11. McGee, E.C. (1996, “Peer evaluation: coaching for coaching”, The 1996 International Conference On Work Teams - Proceedings, pp. 125-31.
12. Nord, J., Groth, M., Leedy, D. and Gauthier, T. (1996, “Peer performance appraisal in a knowledge based work team”, The 1996 International Conference On Work Teams - Proceedings, pp. 133-8.
13. Salam, S., Cox, J.F. and Sims, H.P. Jr. (1997, “In the eye of the beholder: how leadership relates to 360-degree performance ratings”, Group and Organization Management, Vol. 2, pp. 185-209.
14. Severin, T. and Black, R. (1997, “Managing team performance through the use of peer assessments”, The 1997 International Conference On Work Teams - Proceedings, pp. 147-50.
15. Waldman, D.A. (1997, “Predictors of employee preferences for multirater and group-based performance appraisal”, Group and Organization Management, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 264-87.
16. Westerman, J.W. and Rosse, J.G. (1997, “Reducing the threat of rater nonparticipation in 360-degree feedback systems: an exploratory examination of antecedents to participation in upward ratings”, Group and Organization Management, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 288-308.
17. Yukl, G. and Lepsinger, R. (1995, “How to get the most out of 360-degree feedback”, Training, December, pp. 45-50.