A comparison of microtensile bond strengths of several dentin bonding systems to primary and permanent dentin

Dental Materials

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 239-245

  Burrow, M F ^a   Nopnakeepong, U ^a,b   Phrukkanon, S ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b SRINAKHARINWIROT UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Dentin bonding agent; Glass ionomer; Microtensile bond test; Permanent dentin; Primary dentin

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVES; BOND STRENGTH (MATERIALS); BONDING; DENTAL CEMENT; GLASS; IONOMERS; RESINS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TENSILE STRENGTH; TENSILE TESTING;

DENTIN BONDING AGENTS; GLASS IONOMERS; MICROTENSILE BOND TESTS; PERMANENT DENTIN; PRIMARY DENTIN;

DENTAL MATERIALS;

BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; COMPOMER; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; DYRACT; FUJI II LC CEMENT; FUJI IX; GLASS IONOMER; MALEIC ACID DERIVATIVE; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; NON RINSE CONDITIONER; NON-RINSE CONDITIONER; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PRIME & BOND NT; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SILICATE; SILUX PLUS; SINGLE BOND;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTIN; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSILE STRENGTH; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MALEATES; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MOLAR; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; RESIN CEMENTS; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; SILICATES; STATISTICS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS;

EID: 0036582511     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00041-0     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Frencken J.E, Pilot T, Songpaisan Y, Phatumvanit P. A traumatic restorative treatment (ART): rationale, technique and development. J Public Health Dent. 56:1996;135-140. (Special Issue 3)
2. Sano H, Sonoda H, Shono T, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, et al. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength - evaluation of a micro tensile bond test. Dent Mater. 10:1994;236-240
3. Phrukkanon S, Burrow M.F, Tyas J. The influence of cross-sectional shape and surface area on the microtensile bond test. Dent Mater. 14:1998;212-221
4. Phrukkanon S, Burrow M.F, Tyas M.J. Effect of cross-sectional surface area on bond strengths between resin and dentin. Dent Mater. 14:1998;120-128
5. Nör J.E, Feigal R.J, Dennison J.B, Edwards C.A. Dentin bonding: SEM comparison of the resin-dentin interface in primary and permanent teeth. J Dent Res. 75:1996;1396-1403
6. El-Kalla I.H, Garcia-Godoy F. Bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of four adhesive systems in primary and permanent molars. J Dent Child. 65:1998;169-176
7. Walls A.W, McCabe J.F, Murray J.J. Factors influencing the bond strength between glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cements and dentine. J Oral Rehabil. 15:1998;537-547
8. Way J.L, Caputo A.A, Jedrychowski J.R. Bond strength of light-cured glass ionomers to carious primary dentin. J Dent Child. 63:1996;261-264
9. Nakajima M, Sano H, Burrow M.F, Tagami J, Yoshiyama M, Ebisu S, et al. Tensile bond strength and SEM evaluation of caries-affected dentin using dentin adhesives. J Dent Res. 74:1995;1679-1688
10. Nakajima M, Sano H, Zheng L, Tagami J, Pashley D.H. Effect of moist vs dry-bonding to normal vs caries-affected dentin with Scotchbond multi-purpose plus. J Dent Res. 78:1999;1298-1303
11. Hirayama A, Yamada M, Miake K. An electron microscopic study on dentinal tubules of human deciduous teeth. Shikwa Gakuho. 86:1986;107-117
12. Burrow M.F, Takakura H, Nakajima M, Inai N, Tagami J, Takatsu T. The influence of age and depth of dentin on bonding. Dental Mater. 10:1994;241-246
13. Fagan T.R, Crall J.J, Jensen M.E, Chalkley Y, Clarkson B. A comparison of two dentin bonding agents in primary and permanent dentin. Pediatr Dent. 8:1986;144-146
14. Bordin-Aykroyd S, Sefton J, Davies E.H. In vitro bond strengths of three current dentin adhesives to primary and permanent teeth. Dent Mater. 8:1992;74-78
15. Salama F.S, Tao L. Comparison of Gluma bond strength to primary vs. permanent dentin. Pediatr Dent. 13:1991;163-165
16. Gdoutos E.E. Fracture Mechanics: An Introduction. 1993;1-14 Kluver Academic, Boston, MA
17. Tanumiharja M, Burrow M.F, Tyas M.J. Field-emission scanning electron microscopy of resin-dentin interface morphology of seven dentin adhesive systems. J Adhesive Dent. 2:2000;259-269
18. Ferrari M, Davidson C.L. Interdiffusion of a traditional glass ionomer cement in to conditioned dentin. Am J Dent. 10:1997;295-297
19. Tanumiharja M, Burrow M.F, Tyas M.J. The microtensile bond strength of glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) cements to dentine using four different conditioners. J Dent. 28:2000;361-366
20. Nör J.E, Feigal R.J, Dennison J.B, Edwards C.A. Dentin bonding: SEM comparison of the resin-dentin interface in primary and permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent. 19:1997;246-252