Orientation-dependent coarse-grained potentials derived by statistical analysis of molecular structural databases

Polymer

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 597-608

  Buchete, N V ^a,c   Straub, J E ^a   Thirumalai, D ^b  

^a Boston University ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES   (United States)

Author keywords

Coarse grained potentials; Protein packing; Proteomics

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACIDS; ANISOTROPY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONFORMATIONS; DATABASE SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PROTEINS; STATISTICAL METHODS;

COARSE GRAINED POTENTIALS; RADIAL DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS;

POLYMERS;

OXYGEN; PEPTIDE; WATER;

ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; COARSE GRAINED INTERACTION MODEL; COARSE GRAINED WATER MODEL; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULAR MODEL; MOLECULAR STRUCTURAL DATABASE; MONTE CARLO METHOD; ORIENTATION DEPENDENT COARSE GRAINED POTENTIAL; PEPTIDE ANALYSIS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN INTERACTION; QUANTITATIVE ASSAY; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

DATABASE; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PROTEIN;

EID: 0346492919     PISSN: 00323861     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2003.10.093     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Tanaka S, Scheraga HA. Medium- and long-range interaction parameters between amino acids for predicting three-dimensional structures of proteins. Macromolecules 1976;9:945-50.
2. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The Protein Data Bank. Nucl Acids Res 2000;28:235-42.
3. Lee J, Liwo A, Scheraga HA. Energy-based de novo protein folding by conformational space annealing and an off-lattice united-residue force field: application to the 10-55 fragment of staphylococcal protein A and to Apo Calbindin D9K. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96:2025-30.
4. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Self-consistent estimation of inter-residue protein contact energies based on an equilibrium mixture approximation of residues. Proteins 1999;34:49-68.
5. Godzik A, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. Are proteins ideal mixtures of amino-acids?-analysis of energy parameter sets. Protein Sci 1995;4: 2107-17.
6. Sippl MJ. Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. J Mol Biol 1990;213:859-83.
7. Sippl MJ. Knowledge-based potentials for proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1995;5:229-35.
8. Buchete N-V, Straub JE, Thirumalai D. Anisotropic coarse-grained statistical potentials improve the ability to identify native-like protein structures. J Chem Phys 2003;118:7658-71.
9. Samudrala R, Levitt M. Decoys 'R' Us: a database of incorrect conformations to improve protein structure prediction. Protein Sci 2000;9:1399-401.
10. Honeycutt JD, Thirumalai D. Metastability of the folded states of globular proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990;87:3526-9.
11. Levitt M, Warshel A. Computer simulation of protein folding. Nature 1975;253:694-8.
12. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation. Macromolecules 1985;18:534-52.
13. Buchete N-V, Straub JE, Thirumalai D. Orientational potentials extracted from protein structures improve native fold recognition in preparation: 2003.
14. Pearl FMG, Lee D, Bray JE, Sillitoe I, Todd AE, Harrison AP, Thornton JM, Orengo CA. Assigning genomic sequences to CATH. Nucl Acids Res 2000;28:277-82.
15. Bahar I, Kaplan M, Jernigan RL. Short-range conformational energies, secondary structure propensities, and recognition of correct sequence-structure matches. Proteins 1997;29:292-308.
16. Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL. Evaluation of short-range interactions as secondary structure energies for protein fold and sequence recognition. Proteins 1999;36:347-56.
17. Bahar I, Jernigan RL. Coordination geometry of nonbonded residues in globular proteins. Fold Des 1996;1:357-70.
18. Liwo A, Oldziej S, Pincus MR, Wawak RJ, Rackovsky S, Scheraga HA. A united-residue force field for off-lattice protein-structure simulations. I. Functional forms and parameters of long-range side-chain interaction potentials from protein crystal data. J Comput Chem 1997;18:849-73.
19. Liwo A, Pincus MR, Wawak RJ, Rackovsky S, Oldziej S, Scheraga HA. A united-residue force field for off-lattice protein-structure simulations. I. Parameterization of short-range interactions and determination of weights of energy terms by Z-score optimization. J Comput Chem 1997;18:874-87.
20. Liwo A, Kazmierkiewicz R, Czaplewski C, Groth M, Oldziej S, Wawak RJ, Rackovsky S, Pincus MR, Scheraga HA. United-residue force field for off-lattice protein-structure simulations: III of backbone hydrogen-bonding cooperativity in united-residue potentials. J Comput Chem 1998;19:259-76.
21. Hendlich M, Lackner P, Weitckus S, Floeckner H, Froschauer R, Gottsbacher K, Casari G, Sippl MJ. Identification of native protein folds amongst a large number of incorrect models: the calculation of low energy conformations from potentials of mean force. J Mol Biol 1990;216:167-80.
22. Thomas PD, Dill KA. Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: how accurate are they? J Mol Biol 1996;257:457-69.
23. Simons KT, Kooperberg C, Huang ES, Baker D. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. J Mol Biol 1997; 268:209-25.
24. Samudrala R, Moult J. An all-atom distance-dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction. J Mol Biol 1998;275:895-916.
25. Bahar I, Jernigan RL. Inter-residue potentials in globular proteins and the dominance of highly specific hydrophilic interactions at close separation. J Mol Biol 1997;266:195-214.
26. Adams JC, Swarztrauber PN. Spherepack 2.0: a model development facility. NCAR Tech. Note. NCAR/TN-436-STR.
27. Adams JC, Swarztrauber PN, Spherepack 3.0: a model development facility. Monthly Weather Rev 1999;127:1872-8.
28. Arfken GB, Weber HJ. Mathematical methods for physicists. New York: Academic Press: 1995.
29. Keasar C, Levitt M. A novel approach to decoy set generation: designing a physical energy function having local minima with native structure characteristics. J Mol Biol 2003;329:159-74.
30. Park B, Levitt M. Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near native folds from well-constructed decoys. J Mol Biol 1996;258: 367-92.
31. Park B, Huang ES, Levitt M. Factors affecting the ability of energy functions to discriminate correct from incorrect folds. J Mol Biol 1997;266:831-46.
32. Fain B, Xia Y, Levitt M. Determination of optimal Chebyshev-expanded hydrophobic discrimination function for globular proteins, IBM. J Res Dev 2001;45:525-32.
33. Betancourt MR, Thirumalai D. Pair potentials for protein folding: choice of reference states and sensitivity of predicted native states to variations in the interaction schemes. Protein Sci 1999;8:361-9.
34. Silverstein KAT, Haymet ADJ, Dill KA. A simple model of water and the hydrophobic effect. J Am Chem Soc 1998;120:3166-75.
35. Silverstein KAT, Dill KA, Haymet ADJ. Hydrophobicity in a simple model of water: entropy penalty as a sum of competing terms via full, angular expansion. J Chem Phys 2001;114:6303-14.
36. Liu Y, Ichiye T, Soft sticky dipole potential for liquid water: a new model. J Phys Chem 1996;100:2723-30.
37. Chandra A, Ichiye T. Dynamical properties of the soft sticky dipole model of water: molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem 1999; 111:2701-9.
38. Stanley HE, Buldyrev SV, Giovambattista N, Nave EL, Mossa S, Scala A, Sciortino F, Starr FW, Yamada M. Application of statistical physics to understanding static and dynamic anomalies in liquid water. J Stat Phys 2003;110:1039-54.
39. Allen MP, Tildesley DJ. Computer simulation of liquids. New York: Oxford University Press; 1990.
40. Frenkel D, Smit B. Understanding molecular simulation: from algorithms to applications, 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press; 2002.
41. Hura G, Sorenson JM, Glaeser RM. Head-Gordon T. A high-quality X-ray scattering experiment on liquid water at ambient conditions. J Chem Phys 2000;113:9140-8.
42. Sorenson JM, Hura G, Glaeser RM, Head-Gordon T. What can X-ray scattering tell us about the radial distribution functions of water? J Chem Phys 2000;113:9149-61.
43. Mahoney MW, Jorgensen WL. A five-site model for liquid water and the reproduction of the density anomaly by rigid, nonpolarizable potential functions. J Chem Phys 2000;112:8910-22.
44. Kale L, Skeel R, Bhandarkar M, Brunner R, A G, Krawetz N, Phillips J, Shinozaki A, Varadarajan K, Schulten K. NAMD2: greater scalability for parallel molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 1999; 151:283-312.