Conservation genetics of bull trout: Geographic distribution of variation at microsatellite loci

Conservation Genetics

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 17-29

  Spruell, P ^a   Hemmingsen, A R ^b   Howell, P J ^c   Kanda, N ^a,d   Allendorf, F W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

^b OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE   (United States)

^c PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^d Institute of Cetacean Research   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bull trout; Conservation; Microsatellites; Salvelinus

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; DNA; RIVER BASIN PROJECTS; SATELLITES;

MICROSATELLITES;

GENETIC ENGINEERING;

CONSERVATION GENETICS; INTERPOPULATION VARIATION; POPULATION GENETICS; SALMONID;

UNITED STATES;

SALMONIDAE; SALVELINUS; SALVELINUS CONFLUENTUS; SERPENTES; TRANSPOSONS; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 0037716616     PISSN: 15660621     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1021841000262     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Angers B, Bernatchez L, Angers A, Desgroseillers L (1995) Specific microsatellite loci for brook char reveal strong population subdivision on a microgeographic scale. J. Fish Biol., 47(supl. A), 177-185.
2. Angers B, Bernatchez L (1996) Usefulness of heterologous microsatellites obtained from brook char, Salvelinus fontinalis Mitchill, in other Salvelinus species. Mol. Ecol., 5, 317-319.
3. Bjornn TC, Mallet J (1964) Movements of planted and wild trout in an Idaho River system. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 93, 70-76.
4. Buchanan DV, Hanson ML, Hooton RM (1997) Status of Oregon's Bull Trout. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Portland.
5. Cavalli-Sforza LL, Edwards AWF (1967) Phylogenetic analysis: models and estimation procedures. Evolution, 21, 550-570.
6. Estoup A, Presa P, Kreig F, Vaiman D, Guyomard R (1993) (CT)n and (GT)n microsatellites: a new class of genetic markers for Salmo trutta L. (brown trout). Heredity, 71, 488-496.
7. Felsenstein J (1992) PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) Version 3.5C. Department of Genetics, SK-50, University of Washington, Seattle, 98195, USA.
8. Ferguson MM, Danzman RG (1998) Role of genetic markers in fisheries and aquaculture: useful tools or stamp collecting? Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 55, 1553-1563.
9. Hesseldenz T (1985) The demise of bull trout in the McCloud River, California. In: Flathead River Basin Bull Trout Biology and Population Dynamics Modeling Information Exchange (ed. MacDonald DD), p. 38. British Columbia Ministry of the Environment Fisheries Branch. Cranbrook, British Columbia.
10. Howell PJ, Buchanan DV (eds.) (1992) Proceedings of the Gearhart Mountain Bull Trout Workshop. Oregon Chapter of the American Fisheries Society, Corvallis, Oregon.
11. Johnson JE (1987) Protected fishes of the United States and Canada. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
12. Kanda N, Leary RF, Allendorf FW (1997) Population genetic structure of bull trout in the upper Flathead River drainage. In: Friends of the Bull Trout Conference Proceedings (eds. Mackay WC, Brewin MK, Monita M), pp. 299-308. Bull Trout Task Force (Alberta), c/o Trout Unlimited Canada, Calgary.
13. Leary RF, Allendorf FW, Forbes SH (1993) Conservation genetics of bull trout in the Columbia and Klamath river drainages. Cons. Biol., 7, 856-865.
14. Lessios, HA (1992) Testing electrophoretic data for agreement with Hardy-Weinberg expectations. Mar. Biol., 112, 517-523.
15. McConnell SK, O'Reilly P, Hamilton L, Wright JM, Bentzen P (1995) Polymorphic microsatellite loci from Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): genetic divergence of North American and European populations. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 52, 1863-1872.
16. Neraas LP, Spruell P (2001) Fragmentation of riverine systems: the origins of bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) collected at the base of Cabinet Gorge Dam, Montana. Mol. Ecol., 10, 1153-1164.
17. Page RDM (1996) TREEVIEW: An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comp. Appl. Biosci., 12, 357-358.
18. Pratt KL (1992) A review of bull trout life history. In: Proceedings of the Gearhart Mountain Bull Trout Workshop (eds. Howell PJ, Buchanan DV), pp. 5-9. American Fisheries Society, Corvallis, OR.
19. Ratliff DE, Howell PJ (1992) The status of bull trout populations in Oregon. In: Proceedings of the Gearhart Mountain Bull Trout Workshop (eds. Howell PJ, Buchanan DV), pp. 10-17. American Fisheries Society, Corvallis, OR.
20. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered., 83, 248-249.
21. Rieman BE, Allendorf FW (2001) Effective population size and genetic conservation criteria for bull trout. J. N. Am. Fish. Manage., 21, 756-764.
22. Rieman BE, McIntyre JD (1993) Occurrence of bull trout in naturally fragmented habitat patches of varied size. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 124, 285-296.
23. Sakamoto T, Okamoto N, Ikeda Y (1994) Dinucleotide repeat polymorphism of rainbow trout, FGT3. J Anim. Sci., 72, 2766.
24. Scribner KT, Gust J, Fields RL (1996) Isolation and characterization of novel microsatellite loci: cross-species amplification and population genetic applications. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 53, 883-841.
25. Shepard BB, Pratt KL, Graham PJ (1984) Life histories of westslope cutthroat and bull trout in the upper Flathead Basin, Montana. Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks, Kalispell.
26. Spruell P, Bartron ML, Kanda N, Allendorf FW (2001) Identification of bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) X brook trout (S. fontinalis) hybrids using nuclear DNA markers. Copeia 2001, 1093-1099.
27. Spruell P, Rieman BE, Knudsen KL, Utter FM, Allendorf FW (1999) Genetic population structure within streams: microsatellite analysis of bull trout populations. Ecol. Freshwater Fish, 8, 114-121.
28. Swanberg TR (1997) Movements of and habitat use by fluvial bull trout in the Blackfoot River, Montana. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 126, 735-746.
29. Taylor EB, Pollard S, Louie D (1999) Mitochondrial DNA variation in bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) from northwestern North America: implications for zoogeography and conservation. Mol. Ecol., 8, 1155-1170.
30. United States Fish and Wildlife Service & National Marine Fisheries Service (1996) Policy regarding the recognition of distinct vertebrate population segments under the endangered species act. Fed. Reg. [Docket 962639, February 1996], 61(26), 4721-4725.
31. United States Fish and Wildlife Service (1998) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; determination of threatened status for the Klamath River and Columbia River distinct population segments of bull trout. Fed. Reg. [Docket 9815319, June 1998], 63(111), 31647-31674.
32. United States Fish and Wildlife Service (1999) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; determination of threatened status for the Jarbidge River population segment of bull trout. Fed. Reg. [April 8, 1999], 64(67), 17110-17125.
33. United States Fish and Wildlife Service (1999) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; determination of threatened status for bull trout in the coterminous United States. Fed. Reg. [Docket 9928295, October 1990], 64(210), 58910-58933.
34. Utter FM, Waples RS, Teel DJ (1992) Genetic isolation of previously indistinguishable chinook salmon populations of the Snake and Klamath Rivers: limitations of negative data. Fish. Bull., 90, 770-777.
35. Waples RS (1995) Evolutionarily significant units and the conservation of biological diversity under the endangered species act. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 17, 8-27.
36. Williams RN, Evans RP, Shiozawa DK (1997) Mitochondrial DNA diversity in bull trout from the Columbia Basin. In: Friends of the Bull Trout Conference Proceedings (eds. Mackay WC, Brewin MK, Monita M), pp. 283-297. Bull Trout Task Force (Alberta), c/o Trout Unlimited Canada, Calgary.