Connections between the Ivory Tower and the Multicolored World: Linking Abstract Theories of Social Justice to the Rough and Tumble of Affirmative Action

Personality and Social Psychology Review

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 362-373

  Crosby, Faye J ^a   Franco, Jamie L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; POLICY; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; SOCIAL JUSTICE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

HUMANS; PREJUDICE; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; PUBLIC POLICY; SOCIAL JUSTICE;

EID: 0345414520     PISSN: 10888683     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_08     Document Type: Review

References (82)

1. American Psychological Association (1996). Affirmative action: Who benefits? Washington, DC: Author.
2. Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stephin, C., Sikes, J., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3. Banaji, M., & Hardin, C. T. (1996). Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science, 7, 136-141.
4. Blum, E., & Levin, M. (2000). Racial profiling: Wrong for police, wrong for universities. In R J. Crosby & C. VanDeVeer (Eds.), Sex, race, and merit: Debating affirmative action in education and employment (pp. 67-69). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. (Original work published 1999)
5. Bobo, L. (1998). Race, interest, and beliefs about affirmative action: Unanswered questions and new directions. American Behavioral Scientist, 41, 985-1003.
6. Bobocel, D. R., & Debeyer, M. (1998). Explaining controversial decisions: To legitimize the means or the ends? Social Justice Research, 11, 21-40.
7. Bobocel, D. R., Son Hing, L. S., Davey, L. M., Stanley, D. J., & Zanna, M. P. (1998). Justice-based opposition to social policies: Is it genuine? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 653-669.
8. Bowen, W. G., & Bok, D. (1998). The shape of the river: Long-term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9. Canady, C. T. (1998). The meaning of American equality. In G. E. Curry (Ed.), The affirmative action debate (pp. 277-287). Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
10. Connerly, W. (2000). U.C. Must end affirmative action. In F. J. Crosby & C. VanDeVeer (Eds.), Sex, race, and merit: Debating affirmative action in education and employment (pp. 29-30). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. (Original work published 1995)
11. Cropanzano, R., & Konovsky, M. L. (1992, August). Drug testing practices as determinants of employee fairness perceptions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Las Vegas, NV.
12. Cropanzano, R., & Randall, M. L. (1995). Advance notice as a means of reducing relative deprivation. Social Justice Research, 8, 217-238.
13. Crosby, F. J. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation, Psychological Review, 83, 85-113.
14. Crosby, F. J. (2000, September). Affirming action. Invited Keynote address for the Eighth International Conference on Social Justice, College of Management, Rishon LeZion, Israel.
15. Crosby, F. J. (2004), Affirmative action is dead; long live affirmative action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16. Crosby, F., & Blanchard, F. (1989), Introduction: Affirmative action and the question of standards. In F. Blanchard & F. Crosby (Eds.), Affirmative action in perspective (pp. 3-7). New York: Springer-Verlag.
17. Crosby, F. J., & Cordova, D. I. (1996). Words worth of wisdom: Toward an understanding of affirmative action. Journal of Social Issues, 52(2), 33-49.
18. Crosby, F. J., Ferdman, B. M., & Wingate, B. R. (2001), Addressing and redressing discrimination: Affirmative action in social psychological perspective. In R. Brown & S. Gaertner (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology. Vol. 4. Intergroup processes (pp. 495-513). Maiden, Great Britain: Blackwell Publishers.
19. Crosby, F. J., & Franco, J. (2002a, July). Anger as a function of rule change. Paper presented at the 25th annual meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Berlin, Germany.
20. Crosby, F. J., & Franco, J. L. (2002b, June). Changing rules and feelings of injustice. Paper presented at the Ninth International Social Justice Conference, Skovde, Sweden.
21. Crosby, F. J., Iyer, A., Clayton, S., & Downing, R. (2003). Affirmative action: Psychological data and the policy debates. American Psychologist, 58, 93-115.
22. Darley, J. (2002). Just punishments.: Research on retributional justice. In M. Ross & D. T. Miller (Eds.), The justice motive in everyday life (pp. 314-333). New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Darley, J. M., & Pittman, T. S. (2003). The psychology of compesatory and retributive justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 324-336.
24. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice. Journal of Social Issues, 31(4), 137-149.
25. Deutsch, M. (1992). Kurt Lewin: The tough-minded and tender-hearted scientist. Journal of Social Issues, 48(2), 21-44.
26. Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2000). Aversive racism and selection decisions: 1989 and 1999.PsychologicalScience, 11, 315-319.
27. Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2001). Affirmative action, unintentional racial biases, and intergroup relations, In M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Intergroup relations: Essential readings (pp. 146-161). Philadelphia: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis.
28. Downing, R., Lubensky, M. E., Sincharoen, S., Gurin, P., Crosby, F. J., Quierolo, S., et al. (2002). Affirmative action in higher education. The Diversity Factor, 10, 5-20.
29. Folger, R. (1996). Distributive and procedural justice: Multifaceted meanings and interrelations. Social Justice Research, 9, 395-416.
30. Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115-130.
31. Folger, R., Rosenfield, D., & Robinson, T. (1983). Relative deprivation and procedural justifications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 268-273.
32. Golden, H., Hinkle, S., & Crosby, F. J. (2001). Reactions to affirmative action: Substance and semantics. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 73-88.
33. Goldsmith, N., Cordova, D., Dwyer, K., Langlois, B., & Crosby, F. J. (1989). Reactions to affirmative action: A case study. In F. A. Blanchard & F. J. Crosby (Eds.), Affirmative action in perspective (pp. 139-146). New York: Springer-Verlag.
34. Greenberg, J. (1990). Looking fair vs. being fair: Managing impressions of organizational justice. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 111-151.
35. Harris, L. (1992, January-February). Unequal terms. Columbia Journalism Review, 30, 20.
36. Hayes-James, E., Brief, A. P., Dietz, J., & Cohen, R. R. (2001). Prejudice matters: Understanding reactions of Whites to affirmative action programs targeted to benefit Blacks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1120-1128.
37. Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
38. Kinder, D. R., & Sanders, J. (1996). Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39. Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, E. (1986). Beliefs about inequality: Americans' views of what is and what ought to be, social institutions and social change. New York: A. de Gruyter.
40. Kravitz, D. A., Harrison, D. A., Turner, M. E., Levine, E. L., Chaves, W., Brannick, M. T., et al. (1997). Affirmative action: A review of psychological and behavioral research. Bowling Green, KY: Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
41. Kravitz, D. A., Klineberg, S. L., Avery, D. R., Nguyen, C. L., Lund, C., & Fu, E. J. (2000). Attitudes toward affirmative action: Correlations with demographic variables and with beliefs about targets, actions, and economic effects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 1109-1136.
42. Kray, L. J., & Lind, E. A. (2002). The injustices of others: Social reports and the integration of others' experiences in organizational justice judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 906-924.
43. Lerner, M. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum.
44. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-55). New York: Plenum.
45. Leventhal, G. S., Karuza, J., & Fry, W R. (1980). Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction (pp. 167-218). New York: Springer-Verlag.
46. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
47. Lind, E. A., Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (1997). Procedural context and culture: Variations in the antecedents of procedural justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 767-780.
48. Little, B. L., Murray, W. D., & Wimbush, J. C. (1998). Perceptions of workplace affirmative action plans: A psychological perspective. Group and Organizational Management, 23, 27-47.
49. Lynch, F. R., & Beer, W. R. (1990). You ain't the right color, pal: White resentment of affirmative action. Policy Review, 51, 64-67.
50. Mack, D. A., Johnson, C. D., Green, T. D., Parisi, A. G., & Thomas, K. M. (2002). Motivation to control prejudice as a mediator of identity and affirmative action attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 934-96.
51. Marinoff, L. (2000). Equal opportunity versus equity. Sexuality and Culture: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 4, 23-43.
52. Martin, R. (1985). Rawls and rights. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
53. Newman, J. D. (1989). Affirmative action and the courts. In F. A. Blanchard & F. J. Crosby (Eds.), Affirmative action in perspective (pp. 31-49). New York: Springer-Verlag.
54. Perloff, R., & Bryant, F. B. (2000). Identifying and measuring diversity's payoffs: Light at the end of the affirmative action tunnel. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 101-111.
55. Ployhart, R. E., & Ryan, A. M. (1998). Applicants' reactions to the fairness of selection procedures: The effects of positive rule violations and time of measurement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 3-16.
56. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
57. Rawls, J., & Kelly, E. (Ed.). (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
58. Reskin, B. (1998). The realities of affirmative action in employment. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
59. Robbins, T. L., Summers, T. P., & Miller, J. L. (2000). Using the group-value model to explain the role of noninstrumental justice in distinguishing the effects of distributive and procedural justice. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 511-518.
60. Sawires, J. N., & Peacock, M. J. (2000). Symbolic racism and voting behavior on Proposition 209. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 2092-2099.
61. Sears, D. O., van Laar, C., Carrillo, M., & Kosterman, R. (1997). Is it really racism? The origins of White Americans' opposition to race-targeted policies. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 16-53.
62. Sidanius, J., Pratto, J., & Bobo, L. (1996). Racism, conservatism, affirmative action, and intellectual sophistication: A matter of principled conservatism in group dominance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 476-490.
63. Skitka, L. J. (2002). Do the means justify the ends, or do the ends justify the means? A test of the value protection model of justice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 452-461.
64. Skitka, L. J., & Houston, D. (2001). When due process is of no consequence: Moral mandates and presumed defendant guilt or innocence. Social Justice Research, 14, 305-326.
65. Son Hing, L. S., Bobocel, D. R., & Zanna, M. P. (2002). Meritocracy and opposition to affirmative action: Making concessions in the face of discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 493-509
66. Spann, G. A. (2000). The law of affirmative action: Twenty-five years of supreme court decisions on race and remedies. New York: New York University Press.
67. Steele, C. M. (2000). Expert testimony in defense of affirmative action. In F. J. Crosby & C. VanDeVeer (Eds.), Sex, race, and merit: Debating affirmative action in education and employment (pp. 124-133). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
68. Stone, D. L., & Kotch, D. A. (1989). Individuals' attitudes toward organizational drug testing policies and practices. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 518-521.
69. Truesdell, W. H. (2001). The secrets of affirmative action compliance (5th ed.). Walnut Creek, CA: The Management Advantage.
70. Truxillo, D. M., & Bauer, T. N. (1999). Applicant reactions to test scores banding in entry-level and promotional contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 322-339.
71. Tyler, T. R. (1988). What is procedural justice? Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures. Law and Society Review, 22, 103-135.
72. Tyler, T. R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 830-838.
73. Tyler, T. R. (1991). Using procedures to justify outcomes: Testing the viability of a procedural justice strategy for managing conflict and allocating resources in work organizations. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 259-279.
74. Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity and behavioral engagement. Ann Arbor, MI: Psychology Press.
75. Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H., & Huo, Y. J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder, CO: Westview.
76. Tyler, T. R., & Caine, A. (1981). The influence of outcomes and procedures on satisfaction with leaders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 642-655.
77. Tyler, T. R., Degoey, P., & Smith, H. (1996). Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 913-930.
78. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1990). Intrinsic versus community-based models: When does group membership matter? Journal of Social Issues, 46(1), 83-94.
79. U.S. Department of Labor (2002). Facts on Executive Order 11246 Affirmative Action. Retrieved February 23, 2002, from http://www.dol.gov/dol/esa/public/regs/compliance/ofccp/aa.htm
80. van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2001). The psychology of own versus others' treatment: Self-oriented and other-oriented effects on perceptions of procedural justice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1324-1333.
81. Vermunt, R., Wit, A., van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (1996). The effects of unfair procedure on negative affect and protest. Social Justice Research, 9, 109-119.
82. Williams, D. R., Jackson, J. S., Brown, T. N., Torres, M., Forman, T. A., & Brown, K. (1999). Traditional and contemporary prejudice and urban Whites' support for affirmative action and government help. Social Problems, 46, 503-527.