Explaining Controversial Organizational Decisions: To Legitimize the Means or the Ends?

Social Justice Research

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 21-40

  Ramona Bobocel, D ^a   Debeyer, Michelle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Justice judgments; Managerial explanations; Social accounts

Indexed keywords

EID: 0344510113     PISSN: 08857466     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/a:1022128919893     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alexander, S., and Ruderman, M. (1987). The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior. Soc. Justice Res, 1: 117-198.
2. Bies, R. J. (1987). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. Res. Organiz. Behav. 9: 289-319.
3. Bies, R., and Moag, J. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In Lewicki, R. J., Sheppard, B. H., and Bazerman, M (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations, Vol. 1, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 43-45.
4. Bies, R. J., and Shapiro, D. L. (1987). Interactional fairness judgments: The influence of causal accounts. Soc. Justice Res. I: 199-218.
5. Bies, R. J., and Shapiro, D. L. (1988). Voice and justification: Their influence on procedural fairness judgments. Acad. Manage. J. 31: 676-685.
6. Bies, R. J., Shapiro, D. L., and Cummings, L. L. (1988). Causal accounts and managing organizational conflict: Is it enough to say it's not my fault? Communica. Res. 15: 381-399.
7. Bobocel, D. R., and McCline, R. L., and Folger, R. (1997). Letting them down gently: Conceptual advances in explaining controversial organizational policies. In Cooper, C. L., and Rousseau, D. M. (eds.), Trends in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 4. Wiley, New York, pp. 73-88.
8. Brockner, J., DeWitt, R. L., Grover, S., and Reed, T. (1990). When it is especially important to explain why: Factors affecting the relationship between managers' explanations of a layoff and survivors' reactions to the layoff. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 26: 389-407.
9. Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In Zanna, M. P., Olson, J. M., and Herman, C. P. (eds.), Social Influence: The Ontario Symposium, Vol. 5, LEA, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 3-39.
10. Cook, T. D., and Campbell, 0. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
11. Cropanzano, R., and Ambrose, M. L. (April 1996). Procedural and distributive justice are more similar than you think: A monistic perspective and a research agenda. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. San Diego, CA.
12. Cropanzano, R., and Greenberg, J. (1997). Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. In Robertson, I. T., and Cooper, C. L. (eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, pp. 317-372.
13. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, Equality, and need: What determines which value will be used for distributive justice? J. Soc. Issues 31: 137-150.
14. Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social psychological perspective, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
15. Folger, R., and Greenberg, J. (1985). Procedural justice: An interpretive analysis of personnel systems. In Rowland, K., and Ferns, G. (eds.), Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 3, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 141-183.
16. Folger, R., and Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Acad. Manage. J. 32: 115-130.
17. Greenberg, J. (1988). Cultivating an image of justice: Looking fair on the job. Acad. Manage. Exe. 2: 155-157.
18. Greenberg, J. (1990). Looking fair vs. being fair: Managing impressions of organizational justice. Res. Organiz. Behav. 12: 111-157.
19. Greenberg, J. (1993). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In Cropanzano, R., (ed.), Justice in the Workplace: Approaching Fairness in Human Resource Management, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
20. Greenberg, J. (1994). Using socially fair treatment to promote acceptance of a work site smoking ban. J. Appl. Psychol. 79: 288-301.
21. nd ed., Brooks/Cole, Belmont, CA.
22. Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive: Some hypothesis as to its origins and its forms. J. Pers. 45: 1-51.
23. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? In Gergen, K. J., Greenberg, M. S., and Willis, R. H. (eds.), Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 27-55.
24. Lind, E. A., and Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, Plenum Press, New York.
25. Lind, E. A., Kulik, C. T., Ambrose, M. and de Vera Park, M. V. (1993). Individual and corporate dispute resolution: Using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic. Admin. Sci. Quart. 38: 224-251.
26. Messick, D. M. (1993). Equality as a decision heuristic. In Mellers, B. A., and Baron, J. (eds.), Psychological Perspectives on Justice: Theory and Applications, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 11-31.
27. Rea, L. M., and Parker, R. A. (1992). Designing and Conducting Survey Research: A Comprehensive Guide. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
28. Schaubroeck, J., May, D. R., and Brown, W. F. (1994). Procedural justice explanations and employee reactions to economic hardship: A field experiment. J. Appl. Psychol. 79: 455-460.
29. Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression Management. Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA.
30. Scott, M. B., Lyman, S. M. (1968). Accounts. Am. Social. Rev. 23: 46-62.
31. Shapiro, D. L. (1991). The effects of explanations on negative reactions to deceit. Admin. Sci. Quart. 36: 614-630.
32. Shapiro, D. L., Buttner, E. H., and Barry, B. (1994). Explanations: What factors enhance their perceived adequacy? Organ. Behav. Hum. Decision Process 58: 346-368.
33. Thibaut, J., and Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A Psychological Analysis, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
34. Tyler T. R. (1994). Psychological models of the justice motive: Antecedents of distributive and procedural justice. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 67: 850-863.
35. Tyler, T. R., and Bies, R. J. (1990). Beyond formal procedures: The interpersonal context of procedural justice. In J. Carroli (Ed.), Advances in Applied Social Psychology: Business Settings. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 77-98.
36. Tyler, T. R., and Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In Zanna, M. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 25, Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 115-191).
37. Van den Bos, K., Vermunt, R., and Wilke, H. A. M. (1997). Procedural and distributive justice: What is fair depends more on what comes first than on what comes next. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 72: 95-104.