Turning the clock back on ancient genome duplication

Current Opinion in Genetics and Development

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 636-643

  Seoighe, Cathal ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WESTERN CAPE   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS; CELL LINEAGE; DIPLOIDY; EUKARYOTE EVOLUTION; FISH; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE FUNCTION; GENE MAPPING; GENE ORDER; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; POLYPLOIDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TETRAPLOIDY; VERTEBRATE;

ACTINOPTERYGII; ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; EUKARYOTA; FUNGI; MYXOGASTRIA; SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 0345016042     PISSN: 0959437X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2003.10.005     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Wolfe K.H. Yesterday's polyploids and the mystery of diploidization. Nat Rev Genet. 2:2001;333-341.
2. Ohno S: Evolution by Gene Duplication. New York: Springer Verlag; 1970.
3. Wolfe K.H., Shields D.C. Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome. Nature. 387:1997;708-713.
4. Seoighe C., Wolfe K.H. Updated map of duplicated regions in the yeast genome. Gene. 238:1999;253-261.
5. •].
6. Vision T.J., Brown D.G., Tanksley S.D. The origins of genomic duplications in Arabidopsis. Science. 290:2000;2114-2117.
7. Lynch M., Conery J.S. The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science. 290:2000;1151-1155.
8. Arabidopsis Genome Initiative: Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 2000, 408:796-815.
9. Blanc G., Hokamp K., Wolfe K.H. A recent polyploidy superimposed on older large-scale duplications in the Arabidopsis genome. Genome Res. 13:2003;137-144 One of the first papers to use interpolation of pre-duplication gene order to discover duplicated segments corresponding to earlier rounds of duplication. The website ( http://wolfe.gen.tcd.ie/athal/dup) that complements this paper provides a useful tool for exploring the duplicated blocks.
10. Ermolaeva M.D., Wu M., Eisen J.A., Salzberg S.L. The age of the Arabidopsis thaliana genome duplication. Plant Mol Biol. 51:2003;859-866.
11. Bowers J.E., Chapman B.A., Rong J., Paterson A.H. Unravelling angiosperm genome evolution by phylogenetic analysis of chromosomal duplication events. Nature. 422:2003;433-438 Interpolation of gene order before the most recent Arabidopsis genome duplication was used to infer two additional rounds of duplication. Duplications were dated using a phylogenetic methodology. Non-overlapping segments from independent rounds of genome duplication provide strong evidence of whole genome duplications in Arabidopsis.
12. Ku H.M., Vision T., Liu J., Tanksley S.D. Comparing sequenced segments of the tomato and Arabidopsis genomes: large-scale duplication followed by selective gene loss creates a network of synteny. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 97:2000;9121-9126.
13. Wendel J.F. Genome evolution in polyploids. Plant Mol Biol. 42:2000;225-249.
14. Seoighe C., Wolfe K.H. Extent of genomic rearrangement after genome duplication in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 95:1998;4447-4452.
15. Hampson S., McLysaght A., Gaut B., Baldi P. LineUp: statistical detection of chromosomal homology with application to plant comparative genomics. Genome Res. 13:2003;999-1010.
16. Lander E.S., Linton L.M., Birren B., Nusbaum C., Zody M.C., Baldwin J., Devon K., Dewar K., Doyle M., FitzHugh W.et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature. 409:2001;860-921.
17. Venter J.C., Adams M.D., Myers E.W., Li P.W., Mural R.J., Sutton G.G., Smith H.O., Yandell M., Evans C.A., Holt R.A.et al. The sequence of the human genome. Science. 291:2001;1304-1351.
18. Makalowski W. Are we polyploids? A brief history of one hypothesis. Genome Res. 11:2001;667-670.
19. McLysaght A., Hokamp K., Wolfe K.H. Extensive genomic duplication during early chordate evolution. Nat Genet. 31:2002;200-204 Numerous duplicated blocks in the human genome, containing as many as 29 duplicated genes, are reported. Through randomization it was shown that blocks containing more than five duplicated genes were very unlikely to have been created by individual mutations. Duplications were dated using the molecular clock and a phylogenetic approach. It would be interesting to see if the larger blocks, some of which may be the result of more recent segmental duplications, have earlier dates of divergence.
20. Panopoulou G., Hennig S., Groth D., Krause A., Poustka A.J., Herwig R., Vingron M., Lehrach H. New evidence for genome-wide duplications at the origin of vertebrates using an Amphioxus gene set and completed animal genomes. Genome Res. 13:2003;1056-1066.
21. Gu X., Wang Y., Gu J. Age distribution of human gene families shows significant roles of both large- and small-scale duplications in vertebrate evolution. Nat Genet. 31:2002;205-209 An accurate method of dating duplication events appears to indicate that there has been a burst of duplication activity coinciding approximately with the time that the genome duplications should have occurred under the 2R model.
22. Spring J. Genome duplication strikes back. Nat Genet. 31:2002;128-129.
23. Bailey J.A., Gu Z., Clark R.A., Reinert K., Samonte R.V., Schwartz S., Adams M.D., Myers E.W., Li P.W., Eichler E.E. Recent segmental duplications in the human genome. Science. 297:2002;1003-1007.
24. Dehal P., Satou Y., Campbell R.K., Chapman J., Degnan B., De Tomaso A., Davidson B., Di Gregorio A., Gelpke M., Goodstein D.M.et al. The draft genome of Ciona intestinalis: insights into chordate and vertebrate origins. Science. 298:2002;2157-2167.
25. Hughes A.L., da Silva J., Friedman R. Ancient genome duplications did not structure the human Hox-bearing chromosomes. Genome Res. 11:2001;771-780.
26. Gu X., Huang W. Testing the parsimony test of genome duplications: a counterexample. Genome Res. 12:2002;1-2.
27. Larhammar D., Lundin L.G., Hallbook F. The human Hox-bearing chromosome regions did arise by block or chromosome (or even genome) duplications. Genome Res. 12:2002;1910-1920.
28. Amores A., Force A., Yan Y.L., Joly L., Amemiya C., Fritz A., Ho R.K., Langeland J., Prince V., Wang Y.L.et al. Zebrafish hox clusters and vertebrate genome evolution. Science. 282:1998;1711-1714.
29. Koh E.G., Lam K., Christoffels A., Erdmann M.V., Brenner S., Venkatesh B. Hox gene clusters in the Indonesian coelacanth, Latimeria menadoensis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 100:2003;1084-1088 The authors report that the coelacanth genome has four Hox clusters that are analogous to the mammalian Hox clusters. This suggests that the proposed genome duplication in the ray-finned fishes took place after the divergence of the ray-finned and lobe-finned fishes.
30. Taylor J.S., Braasch I., Frickey T., Meyer A., Van De Peer Y. Genome duplication, a trait shared by 22000 species of ray-finned fish. Genome Res. 13:2003;382-390.
31. Abi-Rached L., Gilles A., Shiina T., Pontarotti P., Inoko H. Evidence of en bloc duplication in vertebrate genomes. Nat Genet. 31:2002;100-105.
32. Pevzner P., Tesler G. Genome rearrangements in mammalian evolution: lessons from human and mouse genomes. Genome Res. 13:2003;37-45 The number of rearrangements that have occurred since human and mouse diverged is higher than previously thought. This has implications for the expected lengths of paralogous regions that have been maintained after ancient polyploidy.
33. Nadeau J.H., Taylor B.A. Lengths of chromosomal segments conserved since divergence of man and mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 81:1984;814-818.
34. Blanc G., Barakat A., Guyot R., Cooke R., Delseny M. Extensive duplication and reshuffling in the Arabidopsis genome. Plant Cell. 12:2000;1093-1101.
35. Ziolkowski P.A., Blanc G., Sadowski J. Structural divergence of chromosomal segments that arose from successive duplication events in the Arabidopsis genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 31:2003;1339-1350.
36. Simillion C., Vandepoele K., Van Montagu M.C., Zabeau M., Van De Peer Y. The hidden duplication past of Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 99:2002;13627-13632 The authors show how additional duplicated blocks can be inferred by careful analysis of a genome that has undergone successive rounds of ancient genome duplication. They infer that three, and probably no more than three, genome duplications have occurred in Arabidopsis.
37. Raes J., Vandepoele K., Simillion C., Saeys Y., Van De Peer Y. Investigating ancient duplication events in the Arabidopsis genome. J Struct Funct Genomics. 3:2003;117-129.
38. Vandepoele K., Simillion C., Van De Peer Y. Detecting the undetectable: uncovering duplicated segments in Arabidopsis by comparison with rice. Trends Genet. 18:2002;606-608 A demonstration of the use of comparative genomics to uncover additional duplicated regions in a paleopolyploid genome, in this case the genome of Arabidopis by comparison with the rice genome, but the approach is generally applicable.
39. Pebusque M.J., Coulier F., Birnbaum D., Pontarotti P. Ancient large-scale genome duplications: phylogenetic and linkage analyses shed light on chordate genome evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 15:1998;1145-1159.
40. Goff S.A., Ricke D., Lan T.H., Presting G., Wang R., Dunn M., Glazebrook J., Sessions A., Oeller P., Varma H. A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica). Science. 296:2002;92-100 Evidence for a whole-genome duplication in rice is presented in the supplementary data, but no proof of genome duplication is provided. Date estimates for a duplication event do not take account of the fact that paralogues may evolve more rapidly than orthologues and a single value for the rate of amino acid sequence divergence is used.
41. Zhang L., Vision T.J., Gaut B.S. Patterns of nucleotide substitution among simultaneously duplicated gene pairs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Biol Evol. 19:2002;1464-1473.
42. Kellogg E.A. Genome evolution: it's all relative. Nature. 422:2003;383-384.
43. Lundin L.G. Evolution of the vertebrate genome as reflected in paralogous chromosomal regions in man and the house mouse. Genomics. 16:1993;1-19.
44. ••] using gene order data. The resolution of this disparity will be a test of the different methods that were used.
45. Friedman R., Hughes A.L. Gene duplication and the structure of eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 11:2001;373-381.
46. Osborn T.C., Pires J.C., Birchler J.A., Auger D.L., Chen Z.J., Lee H.S., Comai L., Madlung A., Doerge R.W., Colot V., Martienssen R.A. Understanding mechanisms of novel gene expression in polyploids. Trends Genet. 19:2003;141-147.
47. •]. This was interpreted as evidence that the major part of the differentiation in gene expression between 'homeologous' gene-pairs that the authors have observed either occur at the onset of polyploidization or very shortly afterwards.
48. Senchina D.S., Alvarez I., Cronn R.C., Liu B., Rong J., Noyes R.D., Paterson A.H., Wing R.A., Wilkins T.A., Wendel J.F. Rate variation among nuclear genes and the age of polyploidy in gossypium. Mol Biol Evol. 20:2003;633-643 The estimated date of divergence of one of the constituent genomes of tetraploid cotton from its closest living diploid relative is given (1.5 My). This provides an upper-limit on the date at which allopolyploid cotton was formed.
49. Kashkush K., Feldman M., Levy A.A. Gene loss, silencing and activation in a newly synthesized wheat allotetraploid. Genetics. 160:2002;1651-1659.
50. Song K., Lu P., Tang K., Osborn T.C. Rapid genome change in synthetic polyploids of Brassica and its implications for polyploid evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 92:1995;7719-7723.
51. Chen Z.J., Pikaard C.S. Transcriptional analysis of nucleolar dominance in polyploid plants: biased expression/silencing of progenitor rRNA genes is developmentally regulated in Brassica. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 94:1997;3442-3447.
52. Force A., Lynch M., Pickett F.B., Amores A., Yan Y.L., Postlethwait J. Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics. 151:1999;1531-1545.
53. Lynch M., Force A. The probability of duplicate gene preservation by subfunctionalization. Genetics. 154:2000;459-473.
54. Gu Z., Nicolae D., Lu H.H., Li W.H. Rapid divergence in expression between duplicate genes inferred from microarray data. Trends Genet. 18:2002;609-613.
55. Wagner A. Decoupled evolution of coding region and mRNA expression patterns after gene duplication: implications for the neutralist-selectionist debate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 97:2000;6579-6584.
56. Nembaware V., Crum K., Kelso J., Seoighe C. Impact of the presence of paralogs on sequence divergence in a set of mouse-human orthologs. Genome Res. 12:2002;1370-1376.
57. Kondrashov FA, Rogozin IB, Wolf YI, Koonin EV: Selection in the evolution of gene duplications. Genome Biol 2002, 3:RESEARCH0008.
58. Seoighe C., Johnston C.R., Shields D.C. Significantly different patterns of amino acid replacement after gene duplication as compared to after speciation. Mol Biol Evol. 20:2003;484-490.
59. Zhang J., Zhang Y.P., Rosenberg H.F. Adaptive evolution of a duplicated pancreatic ribonuclease gene in a leaf-eating monkey. Nat Genet. 30: 2002;411-415 The authors provide an outstanding example of the evolution of a protein with novel properties through gene duplication. One copy of the duplicated digestive enzyme studied underwent rapid positive selection in response to a change in diet while the other copy remained unchanged to perform the remaining functions of the protein. This work has implications for the dual roles of relaxed constraint and positive selection in the evolution of novel functionality through gene duplication.
60. Seoighe C., Wolfe K.H. Yeast genome evolution in the post-genome era. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2:1999;548-554.
61. Papp B., Pal C., Hurst L.D. Dosage sensitivity and the evolution of gene families in yeast. Nature. 424:2003;194-197.
62. Vandepoele K., Simillion C., Van De Peer Y. Evidence that rice and other cereals are ancient aneuploids. Plant Cell. 15:2003;2192-2202.