Significantly different patterns of amino acid replacement after gene duplication as compared to after speciation

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 484-490

  Seoighe, Cathal ^a,b   Johnston, Catrióna R ^a   Shields, Denis C ^a  

^a ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS IN IRELAND   (Ireland)

^b SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY INSTITUTE   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Adaptive evolution; Amino acid replacement; Conserved sites; Gene duplication; Gene function

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; DATA BASE; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; EVOLUTIONARY RATE; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE FUNCTION; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENETIC TREE CONSTRUCTION METHOD; PROTEIN DOMAIN;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACIDS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE DUPLICATION; HUMANS; PHYLOGENY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0037387451     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msg059     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bateman, A., E. Birney, R. Durbin, S. R. Eddy, K. L. Howe, and E. L. Sonnhammer. 2000. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:263-266.
2. Braunitzer, G., and I. Hiebl. 1988. Molecular aspects of high altitude respiration of birds. Hemoglobins of the striped goose (Anser indicus), the Andean goose, (Chloephaga melanoptera) and vulture (Gyps rueppellii). Naturwissenschaften 75:280-287.
3. Caffrey, D. R., L. A. O'Neill, and D. C. Shields. 2000. A method to predict residues conferring functional differences between related proteins: application to MAP kinase pathways. Protein Sci. 9:655-670.
4. Casari, G., C. Sander, and A. Valencia. 1995. A method to predict functional residues in proteins. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2:171-178.
5. Dayhoff, M. 1972. Atlas of protein sequence and structure, Vol. 5. National Biomedical Research Foundation, Washington, DC.
6. Dermitzakis, E. T., and A. G. Clark. 2001. Differential selection after duplication in mammalian developmental genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:557-562.
7. Durbin, R., S. Eddy, A. Krogh, and G. Mitchison. 1998. Biological sequence analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8. Efron, B. 1979. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann. Stat. 7:1-26.
9. Felsenstein, J., 1993. PHYLIP (phylogeny inference package). Version 3.5c. Distributed by the author, Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle.
10. Force, A., M. Lynch, F. B. Pickett, A. Amores, Y. L. Yan, and J. Postlethwait. 1999. Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 151:1531-1545.
11. Gu, X. 1999. Statistical methods for testing functional divergence after gene duplication. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1664-1674.
12. -. 2001a. A site-specific measure for rate difference after gene duplication or speciation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:2327-2330.
13. -. 2001b. Mathematical modeling for functional divergence after gene duplication. J. Comput. Biol. 8:221-234.
14. -. 2001c. Maximum -likelihood approach for gene family evolution under functional divergence. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18: 453-464.
15. Hughes, A. L. 1992. Coevolution of the vertebrate integrin alpha-and beta-chain genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9:216-234.
16. -. 1994. The evolution of functionally novel proteins after gene duplication. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 256: 119-124.
17. -. 1999. Adaptive evolution of genes and genomes. Oxford University Press, New York.
18. Iwabe, N., K. Kuma, and T. Miyata. 1996. Evolution of gene families and relationship with organismal evolution: rapid divergence of tissue-specific genes in the early evolution of chordates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:483-493.
19. Knudsen, B., and M. M. Miyamoto. 2001. A likelihood ratio test for evolutionary rate shifts and functional divergence among proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:14512-14517.
20. Kondrashov, F. A., I. B. Rogozin, Y. I. Wolf, and E. V. Koonin. 2002. Selection in the evolution of gene duplications. Genome Biol. 3: research0008.1-0008.9.
21. Li, W.-H. 1997. Molecular evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
22. Liberles, D. A., D. R. Schreiber, S. Govindarajan, S. G. Chamberlin, and S. A. Benner. 2001. The adaptive evolution database (TAED). Genome Biol. 2: research0028.1-0028.6.
23. Lichtarge, O., H. R. Bourne, and F. E. Cohen. 1996. An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. J. Mol. Biol. 257:342-358.
24. Lynch, M., and J. S. Conery. 2000. The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290:1151-1155.
25. Messier, W., and C.-B. Stewart. 1997. Episodic adaptive evolution of primate lysozymes. Nature 385:151-154.
26. Miyamoto, M. M., and W. M. Fitch. 1995. Testing the covarion hypothesis of molecular evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12: 503-513.
27. Nowak, M. A., M. C. Boerlijst, J. Cooke, and J. M. Smith. 1997. Evolution of genetic redundancy. Nature. 388:167-171.
28. Ohno, S. 1970. Evolution by gene duplication. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
29. Rosenberg, H. F., K. D. Dyer, H. L. Tiffany, and M. Gonzalez. 1995. Rapid evolution of a unique family of primate ribonuclease genes. Nat. Genet. 10:219-223.
30. Stewart, C.-B., and A. C. Wilson. 1987. Sequence convergence and functional adaptation of stomach lysozymes from foregut fermenters. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 52: 891-899.
31. Tavema, D. M., and R. M. Goldstein. 2000. The evolution of duplicated genes considering protein stability constraints. Pp. 69-80 in Proceedings of the Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.
32. Thompson, J. D., T. J. Gibson, F. Plewniak, F. Jeanmougin, and D. G. Higgins. 1997. The CLUSTAL - X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:4876-4882.
33. Yang, Z. 1993. Maximum-likelihood estimation of phylogeny from DNA sequences when substitution rates differ over sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1396-1401.
34. -. 1997. PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13: 555-556.
35. Wagner, A. 2000. Decoupled evolution of coding region and mRNA expression patterns after gene duplication: implications for the neutralist-selectionist debate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:6579-6584.
36. Zhang, J., D. D. Kimberly, and H. F. Rosenberg. 2000. Evolution of the rodent eosinophil-associated RNase gene family by rapid gene sorting and positive selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:4701-4706.
37. Zhang, J., H. F. Rosenberg, and M. Nei. 1998. Positive Darwinian selection after gene duplication in primate ribonuclease genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:3708-3713.
38. Zvelebil, M. J., G. J. Barton, W. R. Taylor, and M. J. Sternberg. 1987. Prediction of protein secondary structure and active sites using the alignment of homologous sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 195:957-961.