Neuroimaging of Direction-Selective Mechanisms for Second-Order Motion

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 90, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 3242-3254

  Nishida, Shin'Ya ^a   Sasaki, Yuka ^b,c   Murakami, Ikuya ^a   Watanabe, Takeo ^d   Tootell, Roger B H ^b,c  

^a NTT Communication Science Laboratories   (Japan)

^b MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BRAIN FUNCTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGING; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISUAL CORTEX;

EID: 0242593708     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00693.2003     Document Type: Article

References (108)

1. Adelson EH and Bergen JR. Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 2: 284-299, 1985.
2. Albright TD. Form-cue invariant motion processing in primate visual cortex. Science 255: 1141-1143, 1992.
3. Baker CL Jr. Central neural mechanisms for detecting second-order motion. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9: 461-466, 1999.
4. Barlow HB and Hill RM. Evidence for a physiological explanation of the waterfall phenomenon and figural after-effects. Nature 200: 1345-1347, 1963.
5. Beauchamp MS, Cox RW, and DeYoe EA. Graded effects of spatial and featural attention on human area MT and associated motion processing areas. J Neurophysiol 78: 516-520, 1997.
6. Benton CP. Gradient-based analysis of non-Fourier motion. Vision Res 42: 2869-2877, 2002.
7. Bex PJ and Baker CL Jr. The effects of distractor elements on direction discrimination in random Gabor kinematograms. Vision Res 37: 1761-1767, 1997.
8. Buxton RB, Wong EC, and Frank LR. Dynamics of blood flow and oxygenation changes during brain activation: the balloon model. Magn Reson Med 39: 855-864, 1998.
9. Cameron EL, Baker CL Jr, and Boulton JC. Spatial frequency selective mechanisms underlying the motion aftereffect. Vision Res 32: 561-568, 1992.
10. Cavanagh P. Attention-based motion perception. Science 257: 1563-1565, 1992.
11. Cavanagh P and Mather G. Motion: the long and short of it. Spat Vis 4: 103-129, 1989.
12. Chaudhuri A and Albright TD. Neuronal responses to edges defined by luminance vs. temporal texture in macaque area VI. Vis Neurosci 14: 949-962, 1997.
13. Chubb C and Sperling G. Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 5: 1986-2007, 1988.
14. Clifford CW and Langley K. Psychophysics of motion adaptation parallels insect electrophysiology. Curr Biol 6: 1340-1342, 1996.
15. Corbetta M, Miezin FM, Dobmeyer S, Shulman GL, and Petersen SE. Attentional modulation of neural processing of shape, color, and velocity in humans. Science 248: 1556-1559, 1990.
16. Cropper SJ and Johnston A. Motion of contrast envelopes: peace and noise. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 18: 2237-2254, 2001.
17. Culham JC, Brandt SA, Cavanagh P, Kanwisher NG, Dale AM, and Tootell RB. Cortical fMRI activation produced by attentive tracking of moving targets. J Neurophysiol 80: 2657-2670, 1998.
18. Culham JC, Dukelow SP, Vilis T, Hassard FA, Gati JS, Menon RS, and Goodale MA. Recovery of fMRI activation in motion area MT following storage of the motion aftereffect. J Neurophysiol 81: 388-393, 1999.
19. Dale AM and Buckner R. Selective averaging of rapidly presented individual trials using fMRI. Hum Brain Map 5: 326-340, 1997.
20. Dale AM, Fischl B, and Sereno MI. Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 9: 179-194, 1999.
21. Demb JB, Zaghloul K, and Sterling P. Cellular basis for the response to second-order motion cues in Y retinal ganglion cells. Neuron 32: 711-721, 2001.
22. Derrington AM and Badcock DR. Separate detectors for simple and complex grating patterns? Vision Res 25: 1869-1878, 1985.
23. DeYoe E, Carman G, Bandettini P, Glickman S, Wieser J, Cox R, Miller D, and Neitz J. Mapping striate and extrastriate visual areas in human cerebral cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 2382-2386, 1996.
24. DeYoe EA, Bandettini P, Neitz J, Miller D, and Winans P. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of the human brain. J Neurosci Methods 54: 171-187, 1994.
25. Dumoulin SO, Baker CL Jr, Hess RF, and Evans AC. Cortical specialization for processing first- and second-order motion in parietal and occipital lobe: an fMRI study. Program No. 219.1. 2002. Abstract Viewer/Itinerary Planner. Washington, DC: Society for Neuroscience, Online, 2002.
26. Dupont P, Orban GA, De Bruyn B, and Verbruggen A. Many areas in the human brain respond to visual motion. J Neurophysiol 72: 1420-1424, 1994.
27. Edwards M, Badcock DR, and Nishida S. Contrast sensitivity of the motion system. Vision Res 36: 2411-2422, 1996.
28. Engel SA, Glover GH, and Wandell BA. Retinotopic organization in human visual cortex and the spatial precision of functional MRI. Cereb Cortex 7: 181-192, 1997.
29. Fischl B, Sereno MI, and Dale AM. Cortical surface-based analysis, II. Inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. Neuroimage 9: 195-207, 1999.
30. Gomez Gonzalez CM, Clark VP, Fan S, Luck SJ, and Hillyard SA. Sources of attention-sensitive visual event-related potentials. Brain Topogr 7: 41-51, 1994.
31. Gratton G. Attention and probability effects in the human occipital cortex: an optical imaging study. Neuroreport 8: 1749-1753, 1997.
32. Greenlee MW and Smith AT. Detection and discrimination of first- and second-order motion in patients with unilateral brain damage. J Neurosci 17: 804-818, 1997.
33. Grill-Spector K, Kushnir T, Edelman S, Avidan G, Itzchak Y, and Malach R. Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in the human lateral occipital complex. Neuron 24: 187-203, 1999.
34. Hadjikhani N, Liu AK, Dale AM, Cavanagh P, and Tootell RB. Retinotopy and color sensitivity in human visual cortical area V8. Nat Neurosci 1: 235-241, 1998.
35. He S, Cohen ER, and Hu X. Close correlation between activity in brain area MT/V5 and the perception of a visual motion aftereffect. Curr Biol 8: 1215-1218, 1998.
36. Heeger D. Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex. Vis Neurosci 9: 181-197, 1992,
37. Heeger DJ, Boynton GM, Demb JB, Seidemann E, and Newsome WT. Motion opponency in visual cortex. J Neurosci 19: 7162-7174, 1999.
38. Hillyard SA and Anllo-Vento L. Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 781-787, 1998.
39. Hoge RD, Atkinson J, Gill B, Crelier GR, Marrett S, and Pike GB. Stimulus-dependent BOLD and perfusion dynamics in human VI. Neuroimage 9: 573-585, 1999.
40. Huk AC and Heeger DJ. Pattern-motion responses in human visual cortex. Nat Neurosci 5: 72-75, 2002.
41. Huk AC, Ress D, and Heeger DJ. Neuronal basis of the motion aftereffect reconsidered. Neuron 32: 161-172, 2001.
42. Johnston A and Clifford CW. Perceived motion of contrast-modulated gratings: predictions of the multi-channel gradient model and the role of full-wave rectification. Vision Res 35: 1771-1783, 1995.
43. Johnston A, McOwan PW, and Buxton H. A computational model of the analysis of some first-order and second-order motion patterns by simple and complex cells. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 250: 297-306, 1992.
44. Kelly DH. Motion and vision. II. Stabilized spatio-temporal threshold surface. J Opt Soc Am 69: 1340-1349, 1979.
45. Kourtzi Z and Kanwisher N. Representation of perceived object shape by the human lateral occipital complex. Science 293: 1506-1509, 2001.
46. Kristjansson A. Increased sensitivity to speed changes during adaptation to first-order, but not to second-order motion. Vision Res 41: 1825-1832, 2001.
47. Kruger G, Kastrup A, Takahashi A, and Glover GH. Simultaneous monitoring of dynamic changes in cerebral blood flow and oxygenation during sustained activation of the human visual cortex. Neuroreport 10: 2939-2943, 1999.
48. Kwong KK, Belliveau JW, Chesler DA, Goldberg IE, Weisskoff RM, Poncelet BP, Kennedy DN, Hoppel BE, Cohen MS, Turner R, Cheng H, Brady TJ, and Rosen BR. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 5675-5679, 1992.
49. Ledgeway T. Adaptation to second-order motion results in a motion aftereffect for directionally-ambiguous test stimuli. Vision Res 34: 2879-2889, 1994.
50. Ledgeway T and Smith AT. Evidence for separate motion-detecting mechanisms for first- and second-order motion in human vision. Vision Res 34: 2727-2740, 1994.
51. Ledgeway T and Smith AT. Changes in perceived speed following adaptation to first-order and second-order motion. Vision Res 37: 215-224, 1997.
52. Lu ZL and Sperling G. Three systems for visual motion perception. Curr Direct Psychol Sci 5: 44-53, 1996.
53. Lu ZL and Sperling G. Sensitive calibration and measurement procedures based on the amplification principle in motion perception. Vision Res 41: 2355-2374, 2001a.
54. Lu ZL and Sperling G. Three-systems theory of human visual motion perception: review and update. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 18: 2331-2370, 2001b.
55. Lueck CJ, Zeki S, Friston KJ, Deiber MP, Cope P, Cunningham VJ, Lammertsma AA, Kennard C, and Frackowiak RS. The colour centre in the cerebral cortex of man. Nature 340: 386-389, 1989.
56. Mandeville JB, Marota JJ, Ayata C, Moskowitz MA, Weisskoff RM, and Rosen BR. MRI measurement of the temporal evolution of relative CMRO(2) during rat forepaw stimulation. Magn Reson Med 42: 944-951, 1999a.
57. Mandeville JB, Marota JJ, Ayata C, Zaharchuk G, Moskowitz MA, Rosen BR, and Weisskoff RM. Evidence of a cerebrovascular postarteriole wind-kessel with delayed compliance. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 19: 679-689, 1999b.
58. Mandeville JB, Marota JJ, Kosofsky BE, Keltner JR, Weissleder R, Rosen BR, and Weisskoff RM. Dynamic functional imaging of relative cerebral blood volume during rat forepaw stimulation. Magn Reson Med 39: 615-624, 1998.
59. Mareschal I and Baker CL Jr. Temporal and spatial response to second-order stimuli in cat area 18. J Neurophysiol 80: 2811-2823, 1998.
60. McCarthy G, Spicer M, Adrignolo A, Luby M, Gore J, and Allison T. Brain activation associated with visual motion studied by functional magnetic resonance imaging in humans. Hum Brain Map 2: 234-243, 1995.
61. McCarthy JE. Directional adaptation effects with contrast modulated stimuli, Vision Res 33: 2653-2662, 1993.
62. Mendola JD, Dale AM, Fischl B, Liu AK, and Tootell RB. The representation of illusory and real contours in human cortical visual areas revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 19: 8560-8572, 1999.
63. Moulden B. After-effects and the integration of patterns of neural activity within a channel. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 290: 39-55, 1980.
64. Nishida S. Spatiotemporal properties of motion perception for random-check contrast modulations. Vision Res 33: 633-645, 1993.
65. Nishida S and Ashida H. A hierarchical structure of motion system revealed by interocular transfer of flicker motion aftereffects. Vision Res 40: 265-278, 2000.
66. Nishida S, Ledgeway T, and Edwards M. Dual multiple-scale processing for motion in the human visual system. Vision Res 37: 2685-2698, 1997.
67. Nishida S and Sato T. Positive motion after-effect induced by bandpass-filtered random-dot kinematograms. Vision Res 32: 1635-1646, 1992.
68. Nishida S and Sato T. Motion aftereffect with flickering test patterns reveals higher stages of motion processing. Vision Res 35: 477-490, 1995.
69. O'Keefe LP and Movshon JA. Processing of first- and second-order motion signals by neurons in area MT of the macaque monkey. Vis Neurosci 15: 305-317, 1998.
70. Orger MB, Smear MC, Anstis SM, and Baier H. Perception of Fourier and non-Foufier motion by larval zebrafish. Nat Neurosci 3: 1128-1133, 2000.
71. Over R, Broerse J, Crassini B, and Lovegrove W. Spatial determinants of the aftereffect of seen motion. Vision Res 13: 1681-1690, 1973.
72. Pantle A. Motion aftereffect magnitude as a measure of the spatio-temporal response properties of direction-sensitive analyzers. Vision Res 14: 1229-1236, 1974.
73. Pantle AJ and Sekuler RW. Contrast response of human visual mechanisms sensitive to orientation and direction of motion. Vision Res 9: 397-406, 1969.
74. Petersen SE, Baker JF, and Allman JM. Direction-specific adaptation in area MT of the owl monkey. Brain Res 346: 146-150, 1985.
75. Plant GT and Nakayama K. The characteristics of residual motion perception in the hemifield contralateral to lateral occipital lesions in humans. Brain 116: 1337-1353, 1993.
76. Qian N and Andersen RA. Transparent motion perception as detection of unbalanced motion signals. II. Physiology. J Neurosci 14: 7367-7380, 1994.
77. Qian N and Andersen RA. VI responses to transparent and nontransparent motions. Exp Brain Res 103: 41-50, 1995.
78. Sakai K, Watanabe E, Onodera Y, Uchida I, Kato H, Yamamoto E, Koizumi H, and Miyashita Y. Functional mapping of the human colour centre with echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 261: 89-98, 1995.
79. Sasaki Y, Murakami I, Cavanagh P, and Tootell RH. Human brain activity during illusory visual jitter as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuron 35: 1147-1156, 2002.
80. Schneider W, Noll D, and Cohen J. Functional topographic mapping of the cortical ribbon in human vision with conventional MRI scanners. Nature 365: 150-153, 1993.
81. Sclar G, Maunsell JH, and Lennie P. Coding of image contrast in central visual pathways of the macaque monkey. Vision Res 30: 1-10, 1990.
82. Seiffert AE, Somers DC, Dale AM, and Tootell RB. Functional MRI studies of human visual motion perception: texture, luminance, attention and after-effects. Cereb Cortex 13: 340-349, 2003.
83. Sekuler RW and Ganz L. Aftereffect of seen motion with a stabilized retinal image. Science 139: 419-420, 1963.
84. Sereno MI, Dale AM, Reppas JB, Kwong KK, Belliveau JW, Brady TJ, Rosen BR, and Tootell RB. Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging, Science 268: 889-893, 1995.
85. Simoncelli EP and Heeger DJ. A model of neuronal responses in visual area MT. Vision Res 38: 743-761, 1998.
86. Smith AT, Greenlee MW, Singh KD, Kraemer FM, and Hennig J. The processing of first- and second-order motion in human visual cortex assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). J Neurosci 18: 3816-3830, 1998.
87. Smith AT and Ledgeway T. Separate detection of moving luminance and contrast modulations: fact or artifact? Vision Res 37: 45-62, 1997.
88. Somers DC, Dale AM, Seiffert AE, and Tootell RB. Functional MRI reveals spatially specific attentional modulation in human primary visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 1663-1668, 1999.
89. Taub E, Victor JD, and Conte MC. Nonlinear preprocessing in short-range motion. Vision Res 37: 1459-1477, 1997.
90. Tolias AS, Smirnakis SM, Augath MA, Trinath T, and Logothetis NK. Motion processing in the macaque: revisited with functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 21: 8594-8601, 2001.
91. Tootell RB, Hadjikhani N, Hall EK, Marrett S, Vanduffel W, Vaughan JT, and Dale AM. The retinotopy of visual spatial attention. Neuron 21: 1409-1422, 1998a.
92. Tootell RB, Hadjikhani NK, Vanduffel W, Liu AK, Mendola JD, Sereno MI, and Dale AM. Functional analysis of primary visual cortex (VI) in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 811-817, 1998b.
93. Tootell RB, Mendola JD, Hadjikhani NK, Ledden PJ, Liu AK, Reppas JB, Sereno MI, and Dale AM. Functional analysis of V3A and related areas in human visual cortex. J Neurosci 17: 7060-7078, 1997.
94. Tootell RB, Mendola JD, Hadjikhani NK, Liu AK, and Dale AM. The representation of the ipsilateral visual field in human cerebral cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 818-824, 1998c.
95. Tootell RB, Reppas JB, Kwong KK, Malach R, Born RT, Brady TJ, Rosen BR, and Belliveau JW. Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 15: 3215-3230, 1995a.
96. Tootell RBH, Reppas JB, Dale AM, and Look RB. Visual motion aftereffect in human cortical area MT revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nature 375: 139-141, 1995b.
97. Turano K. Evidence for a common motion mechanism of luminance-modulated and contrast-modulated patterns: selective adaptation. Perception 20: 455-466, 1991.
98. Vaina LM and Cowey A. Impairment of the perception of second order motion but not first order motion in a patient with unilateral focal brain damage. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 263: 1225-1232, 1996.
99. Vaina LM, Cowey A, and Kennedy D. Perception of first- and second-order motion: separable neurological mechanisms? Hum Brain Mapp 7: 67-77, 1999.
100. van Santen JPH and Sperling G. Elaborated Reichardt detectors. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 2: 300-321, 1985.
101. Van Wezel RJ and Britten KH. Motion adaptation in area MT. J Neurophysiol 88: 3469-3476, 2002.
102. Vautin RG and Berkley MA. Responses of single cells in cat visual cortex to prolonged stimulus movement: neural correlates of visual aftereffects. J Neurophysiol 40: 1051-1065, 1977.
103. Watson AB and Ahumada AJ Jr. Model of human visual-motion sensing. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 2: 322-341, 1985.
104. Watson JD, Myers R, Frackowiak RS, and Hajnal JV. Area V5 of the human brain: evidence from a combined study using positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cereb Cortex 3: 79-94, 1993.
105. Wilson HR, Ferrera VP, and Yo C. A psychophysically motivated model for two-dimensional motion perception. Vis Neurosci 9: 79-97, 1992.
106. Wohlgemuth A. On the aftereffect of seen movement. Br J Psychol Monogr Suppl 1: 1-117, 1911.
107. Zhou Y and Baker CL Jr. A processing stream in mammalian visual cortex neurons for non-Fourier responses. Science 261: 98-101, 1993.
108. Zhou Y and Baker CL Jr. Envelope-responsive neurons in areas 17 and 18 of cat. J Neurophysiol 72: 2134-2150, 1994.