Nonlinear preprocessing in short-range motion

Vision Research

Volumn 37, Issue 11, 1997, Pages 1459-1477

  Taub, Ethan ^a   Victor, Jonathan D ^b   Conte, Mary M ^b  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Motion analysis; Non Fourier motion

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTRAST; CONTROLLED STUDY; GRATING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NOISE; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VELOCITY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; HUMANS; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0031011574     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(96)00305-7     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Adelson E.H., Movshon J.A. Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns. Nature. 300:1982;523-525.
2. Albright T.D. Form-cue invariant motion processing in primate visual cortex. Science. 255:1992;1141-1143.
3. Anderson S.J., Burr D.C., Morrone M.C. Two-dimensional spatial and spatial-frequency selectivity of motion-sensitive mechanisms in human vision. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 8:1991;1340-1351.
4. Anstis S.M. The perception of apparent movement. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B. 290:1980;153-168.
5. Boulton J.C., Baker C.L. Jr. Different parameters control motion perception above and below a critical density. Vision Research. 33:1993;1803-1811.
6. Boulton J.C., Baker C.L. Jr. Dependence on stimulus onset asynchrony in apparent motion: evidence for two mechanisms. Vision Research. 33:1993;2013-2019.
7. Braddick O. A short-range process in apparent motion. Vision Research. 14:1974;519-529.
8. Braddick O. Low-level and high-level processes in apparent motion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B. 290:1980;137-151.
9. Castet E., Lorenceau J., Shiffrar M., Bonnet C. Perceived speed of moving lines depends on orientation, length, speed and luminance. Vision Research. 33:1993;1921-1936.
10. Cavanagh P. Attention-based motion perception. Science. 257:1992;1563-1565.
11. Cavanagh P., Tyler C.W., Favreau O.E. Perceived velocity of moving chromatic gratings. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 1:1984;893-899.
12. Chubb C., Darcy U. The short range motion matching strength function measured using histogram contrast analysis. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 36 suppl. 1995;395.
13. Chubb C., Sperling G. Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 5:1988;1986-2006.
14. Chubb C., Sperling G. Two motion perception mechanisms revealed through distance-driven reversal of apparent motion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 86:1989;2985-2989.
15. Derrington A.M., Badcock D.R. Two-stage analysis of the motion of 2-dimensional patterns: What is the first stage. Vision Research. 32:1992;691-698.
16. Derrington A.M., Badcock D.R., Holroyd S.A. Analysis of the motion of 2-dimensional patterns: evidence for a second-order process. Vision Research. 32:1992;699-707.
17. Emerson R.C., Bergen J.R., Adelson E.H. Directionally selective complex cells and the computation of motion energy in cat visual cortex. Vision Research. 32:1992;203-218.
18. Enroth-Cugell C., Robson J.G. The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat. Journal of Physiology. 187:1966;517-552.
19. Fennema C.L., Thompson W.B. Velocity determination in scenes containing several moving objects. Computer Graphics and Image Processing. 9:1979;301-305.
20. Ferrera V.P., Wilson H.R. Perceived direction of moving two-dimensional patterns. Vision Research. 30:1990;273-287.
21. Fleet D.J., Langley K. Computational analysis of non-Fourier motion. Vision Research. 34:1994;3057-3079.
22. Heeger D.J. Model for the extraction of image flow. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 4:1987;1455-1471.
23. Heeger, D.J. & Simoncelli, E.P. (1995). Model of visual motion sensing. In Harris, L. & Jenkins, M. (Eds), Spatial vision in humans and robots. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Hochstein S., Shapley R.M. Linear and nonlinear spatial subunits in Y cat retinal ganglion cells. Journal of Physiology. 262:1976;265-284.
25. Johnston A., Clifford C.W.G. A unified account of three apparent motion illusions. Vision Research. 35:1995;1109-1123.
26. Johnston A., Clifford C.W.G. Perceived motion of contrast-modulated gratings: predictions of the Multi-Channel Gradient Model and the role of full-wave rectification. Vision Research. 35:1995;1771-1783.
27. Kim J., Wilson H.R. Dependence of plaid motion coherence on component grating directions. Vision Research. 33:1993;2479-2489.
28. Kontsevich L.L., Ferster D. The internal structure of cortical motion detectors. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 36 suppl. 1995;692.
29. Kooi F.L., de Valois K.K., Switkes E., Grosof D.H. Higher-order factors influencing the perception of sliding and coherence of a plaid. Perception. 21:1992;583-598.
30. Krauskopf J., Farell B. Influence of colour on the perception of coherent motion. Nature. 348:1990;328-331.
31. Ledgeway T., Smith A.T. The perceived speed of second-order motion and its dependence on stimulus contrast. Vision Research. 35:1995;1421-1434.
32. Ledgeway T., Smith A.T. Effects of adaptation to second-order motion on perceived speed. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 36 suppl. 1995;53.
33. Lu Z.-L., Sperling G. The functional architecture of human visual motion perception. Vision Research. 35:1995;2697-2772.
34. Lu Z.-L., Sperling G. Attention-generated apparent motion. Nature. 377:1995;237-239.
35. Mather G., Tunley H. Motion detection in interleaved random dot patterns: evidence for a rectifying nonlinearity preceding motion analysis. Vision Research. 35:1995;2117-2125.
36. McGowan J.W., Chubb C. Modelling a second texture-defined motion channel. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 36 suppl. 1995;51.
37. Milkman N., Schick G., Rossetto M., Ratliff F., Shapley R., Victor J.D. A two-dimensional computer-controlled visual stimulator. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation. 12:1980;283-292.
38. Movshon, J.A., Adelson, E.H., Gizzi, M.S. & Newsome, W.T. (1985). The analysis of moving visual patterns. In Chagas, C., Gattass, R. & Gross, C. (Suppl. 11), Pattern recognition mechanisms, experimental brain research. Berlin: Springer.
39. Nakayama K., Silverman G.H. Detection and discrimination of sinusoidal grating displacements. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 2:1985;267-274.
40. Naiman A.C., Makous W. Spatial non-linearities of grayscale CRT pixels. SPIE Human Vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display. 1666:1992;41-46.
41. Nishida S., Yanagi J., Sato T. Motion assimilation and contrast in superimposed gratings: effects of spatiotemporal frequency. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 36 suppl. 1995;56.
42. Papathomas T.V., Gorea A., Chubb C. Separate 1st-order and 2nd order motion systems or a single motion system? Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 36 suppl. 1995;51.
43. Papathomas T.V., Gorea A., Julesz B. Two carriers for motion perception: color and luminance. Vision Research. 31:1991;1883-1891.
44. Pelli D., Zhang L. Accurate control of contrast on microcomputer displays. Vision Research. 31:1991;1337-1350.
45. Petersik J. A comparison of varieties of "second-order" motion. Vision Research. 35:1995;507-517.
46. Ramachandran V.S., Anstis S.M. Perceptual organization in moving patterns. Nature. 304:1983;529-531.
47. Reichardt, W. (1961). Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system. In Rosenbluth, W.A. (Ed.), Sensory communication. Wiley, New York.
48. Shiffrar M., Pavel M. Percepts of rigid motion within and across apertures. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 17:1991;749-761.
49. Smith D.R.R., Derrington A.M. Modifying perceived speed: temporal frequency and orientation effects. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 36 suppl. 1995;53.
50. Sobey P., Srinivasan M.V. Measurement of optical flow by a generalized gradient scheme. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 8:1991;1488-1498.
51. Solomon J.A., Sperling G. Full-wave and half-wave rectification in second-order motion perception. Vision Research. 34:1994;2239-2258.
52. Spekreijse H., Oosting J. A method for analyzing and synthesizing nonlinear systems. Kybernetik. 7:1970;23-31.
53. Stone L.S. Precision in the perception of plaid motion. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 31 suppl. 1990;172.
54. Stone L.S., Thompson P. Human speed perception is contrast dependent. Vision Research. 32:1992;1535-1549.
55. Stone L.S., Watson A.B., Mulligan J.B. Effect of contrast on the perceived direction of a moving plaid. Vision Research. 30:1990;1049-1067.
56. Stoner G.R., Albright T.D. Motion coherency rules are form-cue invariant. Vision Research. 32:1992;465-475.
57. Stoner G.R., Albright T.D. Depth from occlusion and non-Fourier motion. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts. 21:1995;511.
58. Stoner G.R., Albright T.D., Ramachandran V.S. Transparency and coherence in human motion perception. Nature. 344:1990;153-155.
59. Taub E., Victor J.D. Higher-order non-Fourier motion stimuli and nonlinearity in early motion processing. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 34 suppl. 1993;1028.
60. Thompson P. Perceived rate of movement depends on contrast. Vision Research. 22:1982;377-380.
61. Turano K. Evidence for a common motion mechanism of luminance- and contrast-modulated patterns: selective adaptation. Perception. 20:1991;455-466.
62. Turano K., Pantle A. On the mechanism that encodes the movement of contrast variations: velocity discrimination. Vision Research. 29:1989;207-221.
63. van Santen J.P.H., Sperling G. Temporal covariance model of human motion perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 1:1984;451-473.
64. Victor J.D., Conte M.M. Motion mechanisms have only limited access to form information. Vision Research. 30:1990;289-301.
65. Victor J.D., Conte M.M. Coherence and transparency of moving plaids composed of Fourier and non-Fourier gratings. Perception and Psychophysics. 52:1992;403-414.
66. Victor J.D., Conte M.M. Evoked potential and psychophysical analysis of Fourier and non-Fourier motion mechanisms. Visual Neuroscience. 9:1992;105-123.
67. Watt R.J., Morgan M.J. A theory of the primitive spatial code in human vision. Vision Research. 25:1985;1661-1674.
68. Werkhoven P., Sperling G., Chubb C. The dimensionality of texture-defined motion: a single channel theory. Vision Research. 33:1993;463-485.
69. Wilson H.R., Ferrera V.P., Yo C. A psychophysically motivated model for two-dimensional motion perception. Visual Neuroscience. 9:1992;79-98.
70. Wilson H.R., Kim J. A model for motion coherence and transparency. Visual Neuroscience. 11:1994;1205-1219.
71. Witt R., Conte M.M., Waran M., Victor J.D. Perceived velocity of Fourier and non-Fourier stimuli. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 35 suppl. 1994;1269.
72. Yo C., Wilson H.R. Perceived direction of moving two-dimensional plaids depends on duration, contrast, and eccentricity. Vision Research. 32:1992;135-147.
73. Zanker J.M. Theta motion: a paradoxical stimulus to explore higher order motion extraction. Vision Research. 33:1993;553-569.
74. Zhang J., Yeh S.-L., De Valois K.K. Motion contrast and motion integration. Vision Research. 33:1993;2721-2732.