Domain motions in GroEL upon binding of an oligopeptide

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 334, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 489-499

  Wang, Jimin ^a   Chen, Lingling ^b  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Domain motions; Intra ring negative allostery; Opposite allosteric effectors; Symmetric GroEL complex

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; AMINO ACID; CHAPERONIN; OLIGOPEPTIDE; PEPTIDE; PROTEIN SUBUNIT;

ARTICLE; BINDING KINETICS; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

EID: 0242493845     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.09.074     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Sigler P.B., Xu Z., Rye H., Burston S.G., Fenton W.A., Horwich A.L. Structure and function in GroEL-mediated protein folding. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67:1998;581-608.
2. Thirumalai D., Lorimer G.H. Chaperonin-mediated protein folding. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 30:2001;245-269.
3. Viitanen P.V., Gatenby A.A., Lorimer G.H. Purified chaperonin 60 (GroEL) interacts with the non-native states of a multitude of Escherichia coli proteins. Protein Sci. 1:1992;363-369.
4. Horwich A.L., Low K.B., Fenton W.A., Hirshfield I.N., Furtak K. Folding in vivo of bacterial cytoplasmic proteins: role of GroEL. Cell. 74:1993;909-917.
5. Houry W.A., Frishman D., Echerskorn C., Lottspeich F., Hartl F.U. Identification of in vivo substrates of the chaperonin GroEL. Nature. 402:1999;147-154.
6. Houry W.A. Mechanism of substrate recognition by the chaperonin GroEL. Biochem. Cell Biol. 79:2001;569-577.
7. Braig K., Otwinowski Z., Hegde R., Boisvert D.C., Joachimiak A., Horwich A.L., Sigler P.B. The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2. 8 Å Nature. 371:1994;578-586.
8. Boisvert D.C., Wang J., Otwinoski Z., Horwich A.L., Sigler P.B. The 2.4 Å crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL complexed with ATPγS. Nature Struct. Biol. 3:1996;170-177.
9. Fenton W.A., Kashi Y., Furtak K., Horwich A.L. Residues in GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release. Nature. 371:1994;614-619.
10. Buckle A.M., Zahn R., Fersht A.R. A structural model for GroEL-polypeptide recognition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 94:1997;3571-3575.
11. Chen L., Sigler P.B. The crystal structure of a GroEL/peptide complex: plasticity as a basis for substrate diversity. Cell. 99:1999;757-768.
12. Wang Q., Buckle A.M., Fersht A.R. Stabilization of GroEL minichaperones by core and surface mutations. J. Mol. Biol. 298:2000;917-926.
13. Wang Q., Buckle A.M., Fersht A.R. From minichaperone to GroEL 1: information on GroEL-polypeptide interactions from crystal packing of minichaperones. J. Mol. Biol. 304:2000;873-881.
14. Zahn R., Buckle A.M., Perrett S., Johnson C.M., Corrales F.J., Golbik R., Fersht A.R. Catalysis of amide protein exchange by the molecular chaperones GroEL and SecB. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 93:1996;15024-15029.
15. Xu Z., Horwich A.L., Sigler P.B. The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL-GroES-(ADP)7 chaperonin complex. Nature. 388:1997;741-750.
16. Hunt J.F., Weaver A.J., Landry S.J., Gierasch L., Deisenhofer J. The crystal structure of the GroES cochaperonin at 2.8 Å resolution. Nature. 379:1996;37-45.
17. Mande S.C., Mehra V., Bloom B.R., Hol W.G.J. Structure of the heat shock protein chaperonin-10 of Mycobacterium laprae. Science. 271:1996;203-207.
18. Chen S., Roseman A.M., Hunter A.S., Wood S.P., Burton S.G., Ranson N.A., et al. Location of a folding protein and shape changes in GroEL-GroES complexes imaged by cryo-electron microscopy. Nature. 371:1994;261-264.
19. 2 chaperonin hetero-oligomer. Science. 265:1994;653-656.
20. Schmidt M., Rutkat K., Rachel R., Pfeifer G., Jaenicke R., Viitanen P., et al. Symmetric complexes of GroE chaperonins as part of the functional cycle. Science. 265:1994;656-659.
21. Sparrer H., Rutkat K., Buchner J. Catalysis of protein folding by symmetric chaperone complexes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 94:1997;1096-1100.
22. Beibinger M., Rutkat K., Buchner J. Catalysis, commitment and encapsulation during GroE-mediated folding. J. Mol. Biol. 289:1999;1075-1092.
23. Horovitz A., Friedmann Y., Kafri G., Yifrach O. Review: allostery in chaperonins. J. Struct. Biol. 135:2001;104-114.
24. Yifrach O., Horovitz A. Allosteric control by ATP of non-folded protein binding to GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 255:1996;356-361.
25. Burston S.G., Weissman J.S., Farr G.W., Fenton W.A., Horwich A.L. Release of both native and non-native proteins from a cis-only GroEL ternary complex. Nature. 383:1996;96-99.
26. Rye H.S., Burston S.G., Fenton W.A., Beechem J.M., Xu Z., Sigler P.B., Horwich A.L. Distinct actions of cis and trans ATP within the double ring of the chaperonin GroEL. Nature. 388:1997;792-798.
27. Rye H.S., Roseman A.M., Chen S., Furtak K., Fenton W.A., Saibil H.R., Horwich A.L. GroEL-GroES cycling: ATP and non-native polypeptide direct alternation of folding-active rings. Cell. 97:1999;325-338.
28. Yifrach O., Horovitz A. Nested cooperativity in the ATPase activity of the oligomeric chaperonin GroEL. Biochemistry. 34:1995;5303-5308.
29. Jackson G.S., Staniforth R.A., Halsall D.J., Atkinson T., Holbrook J.J., Clarke A.R., Burston S.G. Binding and hydrolysis of nucleotides in the chaperonie catalytic cycle: implications for the mechanism of assisted protein folding. Biochemistry. 32:1993;2554-2563.
30. 14 at 2.0 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 327:2003;843-855.
31. Makio T., Arai M., Kuwajima K. Chaperonin-affected refolding of a-lactalbumin: effects of nucleotides and the co-chaperonin GroES. J. Mol. Biol. 293:1999;125-137.
32. Aoki K., Taguchi H., Shindo Y., Yoshida M., Ogasahara K., Yutani K., Tanaka N. Calorimetric observation of a GroEL-protein interaction with little contribution of hydrophobic interaction. J. Biol. Chem. 272:1997;32158-32162.
33. Braig K., Adams P., Brunger A.T. Conformational variability in the refined structure of the chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å resolution. Nature Struct. Biol. 2:1995;1083-1094.
34. Stebbins C.E., Galan J.E. Maintenance of an unfolded polypeptide by a cognate chaperone in bacterial type III secretion. Nature. 414:2001;77-81.
35. McPhalen C.A., James M.N. Molecular structure of a new family of ribonucleases. Biochemistry. 26:1987;261-269.
36. Mauguen Y., Hartley R.W., Dodson E.J., Dodson G.G., Bricogne G., Chothia C., Jack A. Crystal and molecular structure of the serine proteinase inhibitor CI-2 from barley seeds. Nature. 297:1982;162-164.
37. Lawrence M.C., Colman P.M. Shape complementarity at protein/protein interface. J. Mol. Biol. 234:1993;946-950.
38. Ashcroft A.E., Brinker A., Coyle J.E., Weber F., Kaiser M., Moroder L., et al. Structural plasticity and non-covalent substrate binding in the GroEL apical domain. J. Biol. Chem. 277:2003;33115-33126.
39. Farr G.W., Furtak K., Rowland M.B., Ranson N.A., Saibil H.R., Kirchhausen T., Horwich A.L. Multivalent binding of non-native substrate proteins by the chaperonin GroEL. Cell. 100:2000;561-573.
40. Laminet A.A., Ziegelhoffer T., Georgopoulos C., Pluckthun A. The Escherichia coli heat shock proteins GroEL and GroES modulate the folding of the beta-lactamase precursor. EMBO J. 9:1990;2315-2319.
41. Chaudhuri T.K., Farr G.W., Fenton W.A., Rospert S., Horwich A.L. GroEL/GroES-mediated folding of a protein too large to be encapsulated. Cell. 107:2001;235-246.
42. Farr G.W., Fenton W.A., Chaudhuri T.K., Clare D.K., Saibil H.R., Horwich A.L. Folding with and without encapsulation by cis- and trans-only GroEL-GroES complexes. EMBO J. 22:2003;3220-3230.
43. Brunger A.T., Adams P.D., Clore G.M., DeLano W.L., Gros P., Grusse-Kunstleve R.W., et al. Crystallography NMR system: a new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallog. sect. D. 50:1998;905-921.
44. Wang J., Song J.J., Seong I.S., Franklin M.C., Kamtekar S., Eom S.H., Chung C.H. Nucleotide-dependent conformational changes in a protease-associated ATPase HslU. Structure. 9:2001;1107-1116.
45. Carson M. Ribbons 2.0. J. Appl. Crystallog. 24:1991;958-961.