Chaperonin-affected refolding of α-lactalbumin: Effects of nucleotides and the co-chaperonin GroES

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 293, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 125-137

  Makio, Tadashi ^a   Arai, Munehito ^a   Kuwajima, Kunihiro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cooperativity; Molecular chaperone; Protein folding; Stopped flow; lactalbumin

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE DIPHOSPHATE; ADENOSINE PHOSPHATE; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; CHAPERONE; CHAPERONIN; LACTALBUMIN; NUCLEOTIDE;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; KINETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING;

EID: 0033569635     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3142     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Aoki K., Taguchi H., Shindo Y., Yoshida M., Ogasahara K., Yutani K., Tanaka N. Calorimetric observation of a GroEL-protein binding reaction with little contribution of hydrophobic interaction. J. Biol. Chem. 272:1997;32158-32162.
2. Arai M., Kuwajima K. Rapid formation of a molten globule intermediate in refolding of α-lactalbumin. Fold. Design. 1:1996;275-287.
3. Ayling A., Baneyx F. Influence of the GroE molecular chaperone machine on the in vitro refolding of Escherichia coliβ-galactosidase. Protein Sci. 5:1996;478-487.
4. Behlke J., Ristau O., Schoenfeld H.-J. Nucleotide-dependent complex formation between the Escherichia coli chaperonins GroEL and GroES studied under equilibrium conditions. Biochemistry. 36:1997;5149-5156.
5. Boisvert D. C., Wang J., Otwinowski Z., Horwich A. L., Sigler P. B. The 2.4 Å crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL complexed with ATPγS. Nature Struct. Biol. 3:1996;170-177.
6. Braig K., Otwinowski Z., Hegde R., Boisvert D. C., Joachimiak A., Horwich A. L., Sigler P. B. The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å Nature. 371:1994;578-586.
7. Braig K., Adams P. D., Brhnger A. T. Conformational variability in the refined structure of the chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å resolution. Nature Struct. Biol. 2:1995;1083-1094.
8. Brissette P., Ballou D. P., Massey V. Determination of the dead time of a stopped-flow fluorometer. Anal. Biochem. 181:1989;234-238.
9. Buchner J., Schmidt M., Fuchs M., Jaenicke R., Rudolph R., Schmidt F. X., Kiefhaber T. GroE facilitates refolding of citrate synthase by suppressing aggregation. Biochemistry. 30:1991;1586-1591.
10. Bukau B., Horwich A. L. The Hsp70 and Hsp60 chaperone machines. Cell. 92:1998;351-366.
11. Clark A. C., Hugo E., Frieden C. Determination of regions in the dihydrofolate reductase structure that interact with the molecular chaperonin GroEL. Biochemistry. 35:1995;5893-5901.
12. Coligan J. E., Dun B. M., Ploegh H. L., Speicher D. W., Wingfield P. T. Editors of Current Protocols in Protein Science. 1995;John Wiley & Sons, New York.
13. Corrales F. J., Fersht A. R. The folding of GroEL-bound barnase as a model for chaperonin-mediated protein folding. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 92:1995;5326-5330.
14. Corrales F. J., Fersht A. R. Toward a mechanism for GroEL/GroES chaperone activity: an ATPase-gated and -pulsed folding and annealing cage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 93:1996;4509-4512.
15. Fenton W. A., Horwich A. L. GroEL-mediated protein folding. Protein Sci. 6:1997;743-760.
16. Gething M.-J., Sambrook J. Protein folding in the cell. Nature. 355:1992;33-45.
17. Hunt J. F., Weaver A. J., Landry S. J., Gierasch L., Deisenhofer J. The crystal structure of the GroES co-chaperonin at 2.8 Å resolution. Nature. 379:1996;37-45.
18. Ito K., Akiyama Y. In vivo analysis of integration of membrane proteins in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 5:1991;2243-2253.
19. Katsumata K., Okazaki A., Kuwajima K. Effect of GroEL on the re-folding kinetics of α-lactalbumin. J. Mol. Biol. 258:1996a;827-838.
20. Katsumata K., Okazaki A., Tsurupa G. P., Kuwajima K. Dominant forces in the recognition of a transient folding intermediate of α-lactalbumin by GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 364:1996b;643-649.
21. Kawata Y., Nosaka K., Hongo K., Mizobata T., Nagai J. Chaperonin GroE and ADP facilitate the folding of various proteins and protect against heat inactivation. FEBS Letters. 345:1994;229-232.
22. Kuwajima K. The molten globule state as a clue for understanding the folding and cooperativity of globular-protein structure. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 6:1989;87-103.
23. Kuwajima K., Hiraoka Y., Ikeguchi M., Sugai S. Comparison of the transient folding intermediates in lysozyme and α-lactalbumin. Biochemistry. 24:1985;874-881.
24. Landry S. J., Gierasch L. M. Polypeptide interactions with molecular chaperones and their relationship to in vivo protein folding. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 23:1994;645-669.
25. Lin Z., Schwarz F. P., Eisenstein E. The hydrophobic nature of GroEL-substrate binding. J. Biol. Chem. 270:1994;1011-1014.
26. Mattingly J. R. Jr, Iriarte A., Martinez-Carrion M. Homologous proteins with different affinities for groEL. The refolding of the aspartate aminotransferase isozymes at varying temperatures. J. Biol. Chem. 270:1995;1138-1148.
27. Mayhew M., da Silva A. C., Martin J., Erdjument-Bromage H., Tempst P., Hartl F. U. Protein folding in the central cavity of the GroEL-GroES chaperonin complex. Nature. 379:1996;420-426.
28. Okazaki A., Ikura T., Nikaido K., Kuwajima K. The chaperonin GroEL does not recognize apo-α-lactalbumin in the molten globule state. Nature Struct. Biol. 1:1994;439-446.
29. Press W. H., Flannery B. P., Teukolsky S. A., Vetterling W. T. Numerical Recipes in C. 1988;Cambridge University Press, New York.
30. Roseman A. M., Chen S., White G., Braig K., Saibil G. R. The chaperonin ATPase cycle: mechanism of allosteric switching and movements of substrate-binding domains in GroEL. Cell. 87:1996;241-251.
31. Rye H. S., Burston S. G., Fenton W. A., Beechem J. M., Xu Z., Sigler P. B., Horwich A. L. Distict actions of cis and trans ATP within the double ring of the chaperonin GroEL. Nature. 388:1997;792-798.
32. Sparrer H., Buchner J. How GroES regulates binding of nonnative protein to GroEL. J. Biol. Chem. 272:1997;14080-14086.
33. Sparrer H., Lille H., Buchner J. Dynamics of the GroEL-protein complex: effects of nucleotides and folding mutants. J. Mol. Biol. 258:1996;74-87.
34. Staniforth R. A., Burston S. G., Atkinson T., Clarke A. R. Affinity of chaperonin-60 for a protein substrate and its modulation by nucleotides and chaperonin-10. Biochem. J. 300:1994;651-658.
35. Terada T. P., Kuwajima K. Thermodynamics of nucleotide binding to the chaperonin GroEL studied by isothermal titration calorimetry: evidence for noncooperative nucleotide binding. Biophys. Biochim. Acta. 1431:1999;269-281.
36. Tsurupa G. P., Ikura T., Makio T., Kuwajima K. Refolding kinetics of staphylococcal nuclease and its mutants in the presence of the chaperonin GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 277:1998;733-745.
37. +dependent. Biochemistry. 29:1990;5665-5671.
38. Viitanen P. V., Donaldson G. K., Lorimer G. H., Lubben T. H., Gatenby A. A. Complex interactions between the chaperonin 60 molecular chaperone and dihydrofolate reductase. Biochemistry. 30:1991;9716-9723.
39. Weissman J. S., Hohl C. M., Kovalenko O., Kashi Y., Chen S., Braig K., Saibil G. R., Fenton W. A., Horwich A. L. Mechanism of GroEL action: productive release of polypeptide from a sequestered position under GroES. Cell. 83:1995;577-587.
40. Weissman J. S., Rye H. S., Fenton W. A., Beechem J. M., Horwich A. L. Characterization of the active intermediate of a GroEL-GroES-mediated protein folding reaction. Cell. 84:1996;481-490.
41. 7chaperonin complex. Nature. 388:1997;741-750.
42. Yifrach O., Horovitz A. Nested cooperativity in the ATPase activity of the oligomeric chaperonin GroEL. Biochemistry. 34:1995;5303-5308.